Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2019; 25(33): 4945-4958
Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4945
Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4945
Table 1 Association of carcinoembryonic antigen/tumor size with baseline characteristics of rectal cancer patients n (%)
Training cohort (n = 371) | Validation cohort (n = 185) | |||||||
Cases | Low | High | P-value | Cases | Low | High | P-value | |
Age | 371 | 58 (21-89) | 65 (32-86) | < 0.001a | 185 | 61 (25-87) | 57 (35-79) | 0.149 |
Tumor size | 371 | 4.3 (0.8-13) | 4.3 (0.8-13.5) | 0.773 | 185 | 4.5 (1-13) | 4.3 (0.8-10) | 0.472 |
Sex | 0.419 | 0.199 | ||||||
Male | 218 | 177 (58) | 41 (64) | 103 | 82 (53) | 21 (68) | ||
Female | 153 | 130 (42) | 23 (36) | 82 | 72 (47) | 10 (32) | ||
TNM stage | 0.008a | 0.350 | ||||||
I | 104 | 96 (31) | 8 (12) | 48 | 43 (28) | 5 (16) | ||
II | 127 | 99 (32) | 28 (44) | 74 | 61 (40) | 13 (42) | ||
III | 140 | 112 (36) | 28 (44) | 63 | 50 (32) | 13 (42) | ||
Differentiation | 0.395 | 0.826 | ||||||
Poor | 60 | 51 (17) | 9 (14) | 24 | 19 (12) | 5 (16) | ||
Moderate | 209 | 176 (57) | 33 (52) | 102 | 85 (55) | 17 (55) | ||
High | 102 | 80 (26) | 22 (34) | 59 | 50 (32) | 9 (29) | ||
Lymphovascular invasion | 0.697 | 0.683 | ||||||
Negative | 338 | 281 (92) | 57 (89) | 173 | 143 (93) | 30 (97) | ||
Positive | 33 | 26 (8) | 7 (11) | 12 | 11 (7) | 1 (3) | ||
Perineural invasion | 0.039a | 0.073 | ||||||
Negative | 340 | 286 (93) | 54 (84) | 172 | 146 (95) | 26 (84) | ||
Positive | 31 | 21 (7) | 10 (16) | 13 | 8 (5) | 5 (16) | ||
CEA | < 0.001a | < 0.001a | ||||||
0-5 ng/mL | 263 | 262 (85) | 1 (2) | 127 | 126 (82) | 1 (3) | ||
> 5 ng/mL | 108 | 45 (15) | 63 (98) | 58 | 28 (18) | 30 (97) | ||
CA 19-9 | 0.006a | 0.027a | ||||||
0-37 ng/mL | 325 | 276 (90) | 49 (77) | 158 | 136 (88) | 22 (71) | ||
> 37 ng/mL | 46 | 31 (10) | 15 (23) | 27 | 18 (12) | 9 (29) |
Table 2 Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival
Variable | Training cohort (n = 371) | Validation cohort (n = 185) | ||||
Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P-value | Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P-value | |
Age | 1.02 | 1.00-1.04 | 0.024a | 1.03 | 1.00-1.06 | 0.070 |
Tumor size | 1.04 | 0.92-1.18 | 0.506 | 1.14 | 0.95-1.37 | 0.164 |
Sex (ref = male) | 1.43 | 0.88-2.31 | 0.145 | 0.85 | 0.41-1.77 | 0.665 |
TNM1 (ref = stage I) | 1.74 | 1.26-2.41 | 0.001a | 1.93 | 1.15-3.22 | 0.012a |
Differentiation1 (ref = poor) | 0.58 | 0.40-0.84 | 0.004a | 0.53 | 0.30-0.94 | 0.030a |
Lymphovascular invasion (ref = negative) | 1.88 | 0.96-3.68 | 0.066 | 3.11 | 1.19-8.13 | 0.021a |
Perineural invasion (ref = negative) | 1.03 | 0.41-2.56 | 0.954 | 1.29 | 0.31-5.46 | 0.729 |
CEA (ref = CEA < 5) | 1.81 | 1.11-2.94 | 0.017a | 2.72 | 1.33-5.59 | 0.006a |
CA 19-9 (ref = CA 19-9 < 37) | 1.88 | 1.04-3.39 | 0.036a | 2.14 | 0.92-4.99 | 0.078 |
CEA/tumor size (ref = low) | 2.45 | 1.46-4.11 | 0.001a | 3.57 | 1.70-7.52 | 0.001a |
Table 3 Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for disease-free survival
Variable | Training cohort (n = 371) | Validation cohort (n = 185) | ||||
Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P-value | Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P-value | |
Age | 1 | 0.99-1.02 | 0.572 | 1.02 | 0.99-1.04 | 0.173 |
Tumor size | 1.01 | 0.91-1.12 | 0.828 | 1.12 | 0.97-1.30 | 0.128 |
Sex (ref = male) | 1.26 | 0.85-1.87 | 0.247 | 0.75 | 0.41-1.37 | 0.353 |
TNM1 (ref = stage I) | 1.9 | 1.45-2.50 | <0.001a | 1.6 | 1.07-2.39 | 0.023a |
Differentiation1 (ref = poor) | 0.78 | 0.58-1.06 | 0.113 | 0.6 | 0.38-0.95 | 0.031a |
Lymphovascular invasion (ref = negative) | 2.44 | 1.45-4.12 | 0.001a | 2.63 | 1.11-6.22 | 0.028a |
Perineural invasion (ref = negative) | 2.17 | 1.23-3.82 | 0.008a | 1.98 | 0.78-5.03 | 0.151 |
CEA (ref = CEA < 5) | 1.55 | 1.03-2.32 | 0.034a | 1.9 | 1.05-3.41 | 0.033a |
CA 19-9 (ref = CA 19-9 < 37) | 1.43 | 0.85-2.42 | 0.177 | 1.96 | 0.97-3.96 | 0.061 |
CEA/tumor size (ref = low) | 1.72 | 1.10-2.71 | 0.018a | 2.58 | 1.37-4.85 | 0.003a |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival and disease-free survival
Training cohort (n = 371) | Validation cohort (n = 185) | |||||
OS | Hazard radio | 95%CI | P-value | Hazard radio | 95%CI | P-value |
Age | 1.02 | 1.00-1.04 | 0.023a | 1.05 | 1.02-1.09 | 0.003a |
TNM1 (ref = stage I) | 1.47 | 1.04-2.07 | 0.031a | 1.84 | 1.04-3.24 | 0.035a |
Differentiation1 (ref = poor) | 0.57 | 0.39-0.85 | 0.006a | 0.50 | 0.28-0.90 | 0.021a |
CEA/tumor size (ref = low) | 2.18 | 1.28-3.73 | 0.004a | 4.83 | 2.21-10.52 | <0.001a |
DFS | ||||||
TNM1 (ref = stage I) | 1.75 | 1.32-2.32 | <0.001a | 1.43 | 0.94-2.17 | 0.091 |
Lymphovascular invasion (ref = negative) | 1.85 | 1.08-3.16 | 0.024a | 2.45 | 1.00-6.03 | 0.05 |
CEA/tumor size (ref = low) | 1.47 | 0.93-2.33 | 0.096 | 2.61 | 1.38-4.95 | 0.003a |
- Citation: Cai D, Huang ZH, Yu HC, Wang XL, Bai LL, Tang GN, Peng SY, Li YJ, Huang MJ, Cao GW, Wang JP, Luo YX. Prognostic value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen/tumor size in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(33): 4945-4958
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i33/4945.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4945