Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2019; 25(31): 4512-4533
Published online Aug 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4512
Table 1 Age-standardized incidence rates of esophageal cancer (ICD-O-3 C.15) in selected African countries[18]
Age-standardized incidence rate (cases/year/100000 pop)
Country (period covered)MalesFemales
Algeria, Setif (2008-2011)0.60.7
Algeria, Batna (2008-2012)0.50.5
Benin, Cotonou (2013-2015)6.93.6
Botswana (2005-2008)11.43.9
Congo, Brazzaville (2009-2013)0.50.1
Côte d´Ivoire, Abidjan (2012-2013)0.20.3
Ethiopia, Addis Ababa (2012-2013)2.23.8
The Gambia (2007-2011)1.00.5
Guinea, Conakry (2001-2010)0.80.1
Kenya, Eldoret (2008-2011)28.717.1
Kenya, Nairobi (2007-2011)14.114.0
Malawi, Blantyre (2009-2010)30.319.4
Mali, Bamako (2010-2014)2.62.7
Mauritius (2010-2012)3.21.0
Mozambique, Beira (2009-2013)5.53.3
Niger, Niamey (2006-2009)1.20.2
Nigeria, Abuja (2013)0.70.0
Nigeria, Calabar (2009-2013)0.00.0
Nigeria, Ibadan (2006-2009)1.00.4
Namibia (2009)2.40.1
Seychelles (2009-2012)7.51.9
South Africa, Eastern Cape (2008-2012)23.814.6
South Africa: National Cancer Registry of South Africa (2007)6.23.1
Uganda, Kampala (2008-2012)22.912.1
Zimbabwe, Bulawayo: Black population (2011-2013)23.810.3
Zimbabwe, Harare: Black population (2010-2012)16.413.1
Table 2 Summary of studies from systematic review
SAKenUgaZimMalSudNigTanZamEgyMozSenBotGhaEthMulti
Studies on epidemiology (n = 48)
Total number of studies per country138433332211111
Number of studies in cities/provinces85333332211111
Studies on risk factors (n = 37)
Total number of studies per country185321112121
Number of studies on tobacco consumption1032221211
Number of studies on alcohol consumption51111
Studies on management and outcomes (n = 34)
Total number of studies per country183121711
Number of studies that report on chemotherapy5
Number of studies that report on radiotherapy31
Number of studies that report on chemoradiotherapy41
Table 3 Quality of the 12 case control studies included in the meta-analyses of risk factors for esophageal cancer
Quality variableQuality variable categoriesNumber of studiesProportion (column %)
Representativeness of sampling procedures used in each studyNon-probability12100.0
Probability0
Response rateAbove 80%1083.3
Between 60% and 80%2
Not reported0
Validity of measurement methods for risk factorsFace to face interview12100.0
Self-administered questionnaire
Bias in the measurement of the esophageal cancerHistology1083.3
Endoscopy1
Not reported1
Control for important confoundersYes1191.7
Not reported1
Final score (mean across the items)91.7