Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2019; 25(23): 2961-2972
Published online Jun 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i23.2961
Published online Jun 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i23.2961
Author, year country | Design | Duration (mo) | Cirrhosis (%) | Patients (n) | Age (mean) | Sex (M/F) | HBV_DNA | End point |
TDF | TDF | TDF | ||||||
ETV | ETV | ETV | (log10 IU/Ml) | |||||
Ha et al[14] 2015 United States | Matched case-cohort | 24(18-66) | 9.20% | 103 | 43.5 | 65/38 | 5.3 ± 1.5 | RMSRC Decrease in eGFR 20% |
103 | 43.8 | 65/38 | 6.15 ± 1.9 | |||||
Lee et al[15] 2015 South Korea | Prospective | ≥ 6 | NA | 258 | 66.4 | 173/85 | 6.40 ± 1.31 | NA |
308 | 50.5 | 190/118 | 6.72 ± 1.22 | |||||
Yu et al[16] 2015 South Korea | Retrospective | 8.45/18.7 | 50% | 49 | 48.8 | 22/27 | 6.98 ± 1.55 | Creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or 1.5 times above baseline |
58 | 51.7 | 33/25 | 7.05 ± 1.33 | |||||
Park et al[20] 2017 South Korea | Retrospective | 24 | 100% | 73 | 56.4 | 45/28 | 5.4 ± 1.3 | Serum creatinine increase > 0.2 mg/dLeGFR < 60 mL/min (CKD-EPI)Decrease in eGFR > 20% (CKD-EPI) |
162 | 55.6 | 110/52 | 5.6 ± 1.6 | |||||
Koklu et al [24] 2015 Turkey | Prospective | 24 | 34% | 273 | 47.7 | 183/90 | 6.54 ± 1.74 | Shift from ≥ 90 to 60-89 mL/min per 1.73 m2> 25% increased creatinine |
282 | 49.9 | 197/85 | 6.69 ± 1.79 | |||||
Idilman et al[25] 2015 Turkey | Retro-prospective | 36 (6-78) | 39% | 172 | 47 (15-79) | NA | 5.97 ± 1.72 | Serum creatinine > 0.5 mg/dL from baseline, eGFR < 50 mL/min |
183 | NA | |||||||
Koksal 2016 et al[23] Turkey | Prospective | ≥ 24 | NA | 44 | 36 (29-43.7) | 19/25 | 6.8 ± 1.0 | |
32 | 40 (27.2-46.5) | 17/15 | 7.0 ± 1.2 | |||||
Lopez et al [22] 2016 Spain | Retrospective | 12 | 33.90% | 32 | 50.2 | 25/7 | 1127.4 (19-2463,121) | eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR reduction > 25%Increase in creatinine > 1.4 mg/dl |
32 | 49.2 | 23/9 | 29311.4 (376.2-4660,135) | |||||
Tsai et al[21] 2016 Taiwan | Retro-prospective | ≥ 24 | 52% | 37 | 56.6 | 32/5 | 6.3 ± 1.3 | Change of eGFR by 25% |
62 | 55.2 | 46/16 | 6.4 ± 1.2 |
- Citation: Lee HY, Oh H, Park CH, Yeo YH, Nguyen MH, Jun DW. Comparison of renal safety of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B: Systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(23): 2961-2972
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i23/2961.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i23.2961