Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2019; 25(22): 2734-2742
Published online Jun 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2734
Table 1 Classification of pancreatic cysts
(A) Mucinous Cysts
1 Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN)
Branch Duct IPMN
Mixed Duct IPMN
2 Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm (MCN)
(B) Non-mucinous Cysts
Serous Cystadenoma (SCA)
Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor (SPT)
Cystic Neuroendocrine Tumor (Cystic-NET)
Squamous-Lined Cysts
Epidermoid Cysts
Lymphoepithelial Cysts
Pseudocysts
(C) Other malignant Cysts
Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Cystic Degeneration
Acinar Cell Cystadenocarcinoma
Cystic Degeneration of Metastatic Lesions to the Pancreas
Table 2 Treatment and surveillance guidelines for pancreatic cysts
GuidelineRecommendations
Sendai 2006 [8]Recommended surgical resection if any of the following lesions were suspected:
MCNs
Main duct IPMNs
Mixed duct IPMNs
Also recommended surgical resection also based on:
Clinical symptoms
Dilated pancreatic duct (≥6mm)
Intracystic mural nodules
Positive cytology [8]
Fukuoka 2012 [6]Recommended surgical resection for high-risk criteria:
Dilated pancreatic duct (≥10mm)
Presence of an enhancing solid component
Obstructive jaundice [6]
American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) 2015 [9]Recommended EUS-FNA if 2 out of 3 of the following high-risk features were present:
Size ≥ 3 cm
Dilated main pancreatic duct
Solid component
Recommended surgical resection if a cyst had both of the following:
Solid component
Dilated pancreatic duct and/or concerning features on EUS-FNA [9]
Fukuoka 2017 [7] Enhancing mural nodule is a high risk feature if measuring ≥ 5 mm
Added surveillance guidelines for BD-IPMN, noting presence of lymphadenopathy, increased serum CA19-9 and cyst growth rate >5 mm in diameter over 2 years as “worrisome features” [7]
Table 3 A summary of molecular biomarkers for pancreatic cysts types
Pancreatic cyst typeMolecular biomarkers
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmKRAS, GNAS, RNF43 positive[22,24,29,34,37]
Advanced neoplasia: TP53, SMAD4, PIK3CA, PTEN, CDKN2A, AKT1, p16, p53 positive[30-34,38,39]
Mucinous cystic neoplasmKRAS, RNF3 positive[22,24,29,34,37]
GNAS negative[24,28,29]
Advanced neoplasia: TP53, SMAD4, PIK3CA, PTEN, CDKN2A, AKT1 positive[30-34]
Serious cystadenomaVHL positive[22,24,28]
Solid papillary neoplasmCTNNB1 positive[22,24]
PseudocystNegative for DNA
Cystic neuroendocrine tumorNot well described
Table 4 Benefits and drawbacks of molecular analysis of cyst fluid and confocal endomicroscopy[11,12,15,29,34]
Molecular analysis of PCL fluidEUS-nCLE of PCLs
(DNA analysis)
High sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of mucinous PCLsHigh sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of mucinous PCLs
Markers can detect advanced neoplasia in IPMNs; need validation in multicenter studiesNeed further studies to address role of EUS-nCLE in the identification of advanced neoplasia in PCLs
Lower sensitivity for the detection of KRAS mutations in MCNsDetection of flat epithelium in MCNs can be difficult for early adapters of EUS-nCLE
Need large multicenter prospective studies with confirmed histopathology to replicate single center resultsNeed large multicenter prospective studies with confirmed histopathology to replicate single center results
Lack of established markers for cystic-NET and squamous lined cystsEUS-nCLE reveals specific image patterns for different PCL types. Unable to differentiate between cystic-NET and SPN
During EUS-FNA, 5%-10% of PCLs may not yield DNA for molecular analysisThere is a 2%-5% risk of technical and procedural issues with failure of image acquisition during EUS-nCLE
Low sensitivity for the detection of VHL mutations in SCAsEUS-nCLE identifies characteristic ‘fern-pattern’ of vascularity for diagnosing SCAs