Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2019; 25(2): 163-177
Published online Jan 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.163
Table 1 Biomarkers predicting ≥ F3 fibrosis in Japanese non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients
BiomarkerFibrosis stageCut-off valueAUCRef.
Platelet countF415.3 × 104/μL0.92[58]
F416 × 104/μL0.98[59]
Hyaluronic acid≥ F342 ng/mL0.97[59]
Type 4 collagen 7S≥ F36.0 ng/mL0.88[60]
Mac2-binding protein≥ F32.24 μg/mL0.78[61]
WFA+Mac2-binding protein≥ F30.83 COI0.82[60]
≥ F31.23 COI0.83[62]
Autotaxin≥ F31.19 mg/L0.75[63]
F41.20 mg/L0.87
Table 2 Representative indices predicting ≥ F3 fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients
Score/IndexFormulaRef.
NAFLD fibrosis score1.675 + 0.037 × Age + 0.094 × BMI + 1.13 × IFG/DM (with = 1, without = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT - 0.013 × PLT - 0.66 × Alb[64]
APRI[(AST/upper limit of normal AST)/PLT] × 100[65]
FIB-4 index[Age × AST]/[PLT × ALT1/2][66]
BARD scoreBMI ≥ 28 (1 point)[67]
AST/ALT ≥ 0.8 (2 points)
The presence of DM (1 point)
CA index-fibrosis1.5 × 4C7S + 0.0264 × AST[68]
ELF score2.494 + ln(hyaluronic acid) + ln(P-III-P) + ln(TIMP-1)[69]
Table 3 Novel therapeutic agents for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/ non-alcoholic steatohepatitis under clinical trials
TargetAgentActionClinical trial
Diabetes, insulin resistanceSemaglutideDPP4 inhibitorPhase II
GliflozinSGLT2 inhibitor[89]Pilot
BMS-986036Recombinant FGF21[90]Phase II
DyslipidemiaAramcholSCD inhibitorPhase II
GS-0976ACC inhibitorPhase II
Nuclear receptorObeticholic acidFXR agonist[84]Phase III
ElafibranorPPARα/δ agonist[85]Phase III
MGL-3196TRβ agonistPhase II
ApoptosisEmricasanPan-caspase inhibitor[91]Phase II
Inflammation, fibrosisSelonsertibASK1 inhibitor[87]Phase III
CenicrivirocCCR2/5 antagonist[88]Phase III
JKB-121TLR4 antagonistPhase II
GR-MD-02Galectin 3 inhibitor[92]Phase II
ND-LO2-s0201HSP47 siRNA[93]Phase I
Table 4 Dysbiosis in human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/ non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
Ref.PatientsChanges in microbiotaRelated phenotypic changes
Boursier et al[94]F0/1 NAFLD 30 (NASH 10), ≥ F2 NAFLD 27 (NASH 25)Bacteroides↑ in NASH, Ruminococcus↑ in ≥ F2Not assessed
Da Silva et al[95]NAFLD 39 (NASH 24, NAFL 15); healthy control 28Lactobacillus↑, Lactobacillaceae↑, Bacteroidetes↓, Firmicutes↓, Ruminococcus↓, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii↓, Coprococcus↓ in NAFLD compared to control; no differences between NASH and NAFLFecal propionate↑, isobutyric acid↑, Serum 2-hydroxy-butyrate↑, L-lactate↑ in NAFLD
Rau et al[96]NAFLD 32 (NASH 18, NAFL 14); healthy control 27Fusobacteria↑, Fusobacteriaceae↑ in NASH compared to NAFL and controlFecal propionate↑, acetate↑, Treg↓ in NASH