Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2019; 25(13): 1531-1549
Published online Apr 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i13.1531
Published online Apr 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i13.1531
Table 1 Important documents for laparoscopic choledocholithotomy
| Reference number | Remarks |
| [7,8,14,32-24] | Experience alone is not enough to ensure successful performance of laparoscopic surgeries. |
| [7,30,84] | The right upper quadrant provides a suitable location for the surgical field in laparoscopic procedures. |
| [22,23] | Technical challenges have prevented laparoscopic surgeries for the EHBD (e.g., choledocholithotomy and choledochojejunostomy) from gaining worldwide popularity. |
| [26-28,30,31,56,59] | Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy provides safe and feasible treatment for recurrent stones and associated cholangitis. |
| [22,26-28,110,111] | For acute cholangitis and bile duct stone, one-stage laparoscopic choledocholithotomy has excellent clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. |
| [19,45] | For patients with acute cholangitis, biliary drainage should be performed as soon as possible. |
| Risk factors for general anesthesia should be completely removed by preoperative biliary drainage. | |
| [45] | Transpapillary biliary drainage without EST (i.e., nasobiliary drainage or biliary stenting) should be performed initially as an emergent therapy for acute cholangitis. |
| For patients with acute cholangitis, EST is not routinely recommended for biliary drainage alone. | |
| [20] | Ill-considered use of EST should be avoided. |
| [28,56-59] | Acute cholangitis and bile duct stones are critical problems in a patient after abdominal surgery. |
| [28,59] | Laparoscopic approach is advantageous even for reoperative choledocholithotomy in a patient with a past history of laparotomy. |
| [62] | Cholecystectomy after EST for biliary duct stones does not reduce the incidence of recurrent cholangitis. |
| [22] | Transcystic C-tube drainage has a lower complication rate than transductal T-tube drainage or EST. |
| [69] | Previously, choledocholithotomy via conventional open surgery with transductal T-tube drainage versus laparoscopic primary closure with transcystic C-tube drainage remains controversial. |
| [22,27,69,106-109] | Currently, laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with primary closure and transcystic C-tube drainage is superior to conventional open surgery with transductal T-tube drainage. |
| [47,49,70] | Currently, HBP surgeons intend to end the use of transductal T-tube drainage. |
| [73,74] | Operative time is greatly affected by the duration of stone removal. |
| [77,78] | Detailed preoperative investigation is important for successful laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with a shortened operative time. |
| [91-93] | The method of primary closure of the transductal incision is chosen according to the EHBD diameter. |
| [32] | Cautery-induced injury results in necrotizing loss of ductal and/or perivascular tissues. |
| Anatomical misidentificaion should be avoided. |
- Citation: Hori T. Comprehensive and innovative techniques for laparoscopic choledocholithotomy: A surgical guide to successfully accomplish this advanced manipulation. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(13): 1531-1549
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i13/1531.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i13.1531
