Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2018; 24(9): 1046-1055
Published online Mar 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i9.1046
Published online Mar 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i9.1046
Table 1 Baseline characteristics n (%)
Parameter | PGA + stent group (n = 34) | Stent group (n = 32) | P value |
Patients characteristic | |||
Age (yr) | 62.74 ± 8.38 | 59.91 ± 8.80 | 0.186 |
Gender (Male/Female) | 22/12 | 18/14 | 0.482 |
Tumor lesion feature | |||
Location | 0.145 | ||
Upper third | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Middle third | 12 (35) | 17 (53) | |
Lower third | 22 (65) | 15 (47) | |
Tissue depth | 0.331 | ||
M1 | 20 (59) | 15 (47) | |
M2 | 14 (41) | 17 (53) | |
Longitudinal length (cm) | 5.97 ± 2.68 | 6.06 ± 2.12 | 0.878 |
Circumferential range | 0.684 | ||
3/4 | 12 (35) | 14 (44) | |
4/5 | 8 (24) | 8 (25) | |
1/1 | 14 (41) | 10 (31) |
Table 2 Comparison of esophageal stricture features in polyglycolic acid + stent and stent groups
Parameter | PGA + stent group (n = 7) | Stent group (n = 15) | P value |
Length (cm) | 0.97 + 0.59 | 1.47 + 0.59 | 0.080 |
Diameter (cm) | 0.37 + 0.17 | 0.51 + 0.14 | 0.061 |
Location (distance from the incisors, cm) | 31.71 + 3.20 | 29.07 + 5.20 | 0.232 |
Balloon dilatation times | 4 (2-5) | 6 (1-14) | 0.007 |
Table 3 Comparison of tumor lesion features in patients with esophageal stricture n (%)
Parameter | PGA + stent group (n = 7) | Stent group (n = 15) | P value |
Location | 0.899 | ||
Upper third | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Middle third | 4 (57) | 9 (60) | |
Lower third | 3 (43) | 6 (40) | |
Tissue depth | 0.823 | ||
M1 | 2 (29) | 5 (33) | |
M2 | 5 (71) | 10 (67) | |
Longitudinal length (cm) | 7.71 + 3.50 | 6.60 + 2.10 | 0.360 |
Circumferential range | 0.181 | ||
3/4 | 0 (0) | 4 (27) | |
4/5 | 1 (14) | 4 (27) | |
1/1 | 6 (86) | 7 (47) |
Table 4 Logistic analysis of factors affecting esophageal stricture occurrence
Parameter | Univariate logistic regression | Multivariate logistic regression | ||||||
P value | OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | |||
Lower | Higher | Lower | Higher | |||||
PGA + stent (vs stent alone) | 0.027 | 0.294 | 0.099 | 0.868 | 0.026 | 0.197 | 0.047 | 0.820 |
Age ≥ 62 yr | 0.298 | 1.733 | 0.615 | 4.887 | - | - | - | - |
Location - middle third (vs lower third) | 0.083 | 2.528 | 0.886 | 7.214 | 0.034 | 5.148 | 1.135 | 23.344 |
Longitudinal length ≥ 6 cm | 0.059 | 2.779 | 0.963 | 8.019 | 0.092 | 3.826 | 0.801 | 18.270 |
Circumferential range = 1/1 (vs others) | 0.008 | 4.333 | 1.457 | 12.888 | 0.028 | 5.113 | 1.194 | 21.892 |
Tissue depth M2 (vs M1) | 0.017 | 3.750 | 1.264 | 11.123 | 0.069 | 3.284 | 0.912 | 11.822 |
- Citation: Chai NL, Feng J, Li LS, Liu SZ, Du C, Zhang Q, Linghu EQ. Effect of polyglycolic acid sheet plus esophageal stent placement in preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early-stage esophageal cancer: A randomized, controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(9): 1046-1055
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i9/1046.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i9.1046