Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2018; 24(45): 5179-5188
Published online Dec 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i45.5179
Published online Dec 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i45.5179
Table 1 Baseline patient’s characteristics n (%)
| Total number of lesions | 112 |
| Mean age, years (SD) | 67.7 (10.1) |
| Sex ratio, % male | 57.1 |
| Weight (Kg, SD) | 74.7 (15.4) |
| BMI (Kg/m2, SD) | 27.6 (5.1) |
| Family History of CRC | 27 (24.1) |
| Personal History of CRC | 7 (6.3) |
| Current smoking | 20 (17.9) |
| Diabetes | 19 (17.0) |
| Lesion size, mm (median, interquartile range) | 20 (14-30) |
| Categorical size | |
| 10-19 mm | 47 (42.0) |
| 20-39 mm | 52 (46.4) |
| ≥ 40 mm | 13 (11.6) |
| Location of the lesion | |
| Cecum | 15 (13.4) |
| Ascending | 53 (47.3) |
| Transverse | 20 (17.9) |
| Descending | 4 (3.6) |
| Sigmoid | 10 (8.9) |
| Rectum | 10 (8.9) |
| ASA classification | |
| ASA I | 18 (16.1) |
| ASA II | 56 (50.0) |
| ASA III | 38 (33.9) |
| Paris classification | |
| 0-Is | 48 (42.9) |
| 0-IIa | 50 (44.6) |
| Other combinations (IIa + Is/IIc) | 14 (12.5) |
| NICE classification | |
| NICE I | 17 (15.2) |
| NICE II | 94 (83.9) |
| NICE III | 1 (0.9) |
| Number of resected pieces | |
| 2-5 pieces | 46 (41.1) |
| > 5 pieces | 66 (58.9) |
| Baseline histology | |
| Hyperplastic | 4 (3.6) |
| Adenoma with LGD | 53 (47.3) |
| Adenoma with HGD | 39 (34.8) |
| Sessile serrated adenoma (SSA) | 11 (9.8) |
| Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) | 2 (1.8) |
| Adenocarcinoma (pT1 stage) | 3 (2.7) |
| Use of clips | 59 (52.7) |
| Clips per lesion (median, interquartile range) | 3 (1-3) |
| Use of clips | |
| Prophylactic | 56 (94.9) |
| Intraprocedural bleeding | 2 (3.4) |
| Suspicion of deep mural injury | 1 (1.7) |
| Tattooed lesion after EPMR | 38 (33.9) |
| Endoscopist who performed piecemeal EMR | |
| Expert endoscopists | 98 (87.5) |
| General gastroenterologists | 14 (12.5) |
| Median time to review (months, interquartile range) | 3.9 (3.0-5.3) |
Table 2 Characteristics between groups at protocol study
| WLE-NBI (n = 57) | NBI-WLE (n = 55) | P value | |
| Sex (male, %) | 54.4 | 60.0 | 0.36 |
| Age (yr) | 67.3 | 68.2 | 0.65 |
| BMI (mean) | 28.2 | 27.0 | 0.23 |
| Baseline polyp size | 0.002 | ||
| 10-19 mm | 16 (28.1) | 31 (56.4) | |
| 20-39 mm | 30 (52.6) | 22 (40.0) | |
| ≥ 40 mm | 11 (19.3) | 2 (3.6) | |
| Location, right sided (%) | 79.0 | 78.2 | 0.92 |
| Paris Classification | 0.34 | ||
| 0-Is | 26 (45.6) | 22 (40.0) | |
| 0-IIa | 22 (38.6) | 28 (50.9) | |
| Other Combinations | 9 (15.8) | 5 (9.1) | |
| NICE Classification | 0.90 | ||
| NICE I | 8 (14.0) | 9 (16.4) | |
| NICE II | 48 (84.2) | 46 (83.6) | |
| NICE III | 1 (1.8) | 0 (0) | |
| Baseline histology | 0.78 | ||
| Hyperplastic | 2 (3.5) | 2 (3.6) | |
| Adenoma with LGD | 26 (45.6) | 27 (49.1) | |
| Adenoma with HGD | 22 (38.6) | 17 (30.9) | |
| Sessile Serrated Adenoma (SSA) | 5 (8.8) | 6 (10.9) | |
| Traditional serrated adenoma | 0 (0) | 2 (3.6) | |
| Adenocarcinoma (pT1 stage) | 2 (3.5) | 1 (1.8) | |
| Morphology of scar on site 1 | 0.12 | ||
| Flat | 29 (50.9) | 20 (36.4) | |
| Nodular elevated | 28 (49.1) | 35 (63.6) | |
| Presence of clips on scar | 3 (5.3) | 8 (14.6) | 0.12 |
| Residual neoplasia on histology assessment | 0.74 | ||
| Negative | 38 (66.7) | 35 (63.6) | |
| Positive | 19 (33.3) | 20 (36.4) | |
| Polyps resected (mean, SD) | 2.4 (2.7) | 2.4 (2.7) | 0.92 |
| Mean time baseline EPMR colonoscopy (min) | 55.9 | 51.9 | 0.38 |
Table 3 Diagnostic performance of white light endoscopy and narrow band imaging for each group
| WLE-NBI group | NBI-WLE group | |||||
| WLE (95%CI) | NBI (95%CI) | NBI (95%CI) | WLE (95%CI) | |||
| Sensitivity | 78.9% (56.7-91.5) | 89.5% (68.6-97.1) | 85.0% (64.0-94.8) | 80.0% (58.4-91.9) | ||
| Specificity | 84.2% (69.6-92.6) | 84.2% (69.6-92.6) | 77.1% (61.0-87.9) | 82.9% (67.3-91.9) | ||
| False positive | 15.8% (7.4-30.4) | 15.80% (7.4-30.4) | 22.9% (12.1-39.0) | 17.1% (8.1-32.7) | ||
| False negative | 21.1% (8.5-43.3) | 10.50% (2.9-31.4) | 15.00% (5.2-36.0) | 20.0% (8.1-41.6) | ||
| PPV | 71.4% (50.0-86.2) | 73.9% (53.5-87.5) | 68.0% (48.4-82.8) | 72.7% (51.8-86.8) | ||
| NPV | 88.9% (74.7-95.6) | 94.1% (80.9-98.4) | 90.0% (74.4-96.5) | 87.9% (72.7-95.2) | ||
| LR + | 5 (2.3-10.8) | 5.7 (2.7-12.0) | 3.7 (2.0-7.0) | 4.7 (2.2-10.0) | ||
| LR - | 0.3 (0.1-0.6) | 0.1 (0.03-0.5) | 0.2 (0.1-0.6) | 0.2 (0.1-0.6) | ||
| Global accuracy | 82.5% (70.6-90.2) | 86.0% (74.7-92.7) | 80.0% (67.6-88.4) | 81.8% (69.7-89.8) | ||
| AUC | 81.6% (70.5-92.7) | 86.8% (77.6-96.0) | P = 0.15 | 81.1% (70.4-91.8) | 81.4% (70.4-92.4) | P = 0.9 |
- Citation: Riu Pons F, Andreu M, Gimeno Beltran J, Álvarez-Gonzalez MA, Seoane Urgorri A, Dedeu JM, Barranco Priego L, Bessa X. Narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in the characterization of a polypectomy scar: A single-blind observational study. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(45): 5179-5188
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i45/5179.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i45.5179
