Graham D, Sever N, Magee C, Waddingham W, Banks M, Sweis R, Al-Yousuf H, Mitchison M, Alzoubaidi D, Rodriguez-Justo M, Lovat L, Novelli M, Jansen M, Haidry R. Risk of lymph node metastases in patients with T1b oesophageal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective single centre experience. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(41): 4698-4707 [PMID: 30416317 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i41.4698]
Corresponding Author of This Article
David Graham, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, Doctor, GI Services, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom. david.graham14@nhs.net
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2018; 24(41): 4698-4707 Published online Nov 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i41.4698
Table 1 Patient demographics
Patients
Total, n
60 (100%)
Average age at EMR (IQR)
70 (66-75)
Gender
Male
51 (85%)
Female
9 (15%)
Barrett's oesophagus
Circumference (range)
5 (0-13)
Maximum (range)
7 (1-15)
In surveillance program
Yes, median years (IQR)
36 (61%), 6 (3-9)
No, new finding
19 (32%)
Data N/A
5 (7%)
Table 2 Tumour index endoscopic mucosal resection characteristics n (%)
Tumour location
Oesophagus
55 (92)
Cardia (Siewert 2)
5 (8)
Tumour histopathology
Differentiation
Well (G1)
2 (3)
Moderate (G2)
28 (47)
Poor (G3)
29 (49)
X (GX)
1 (1)
Depth of submucosal invasion
Sm1 (< 500 μm)
25 (42)
Sm2/3 (> 500 μm)
25 (42)
X
10 (16)
Lymphovascular invasion
Negative (LVI-)
40 (67)
Positive (LVI+)
14 (23)
X (LVX)
6 (10)
Resection (vertical margin)
Complete (R0)
17 (28)
Incomplete (R1)
43 (84)
Tumour risk group
Low-risk (LR)
13 (22)
High-risk (HR)
47 (78)
Table 3 Histopathologic tumour characteristics of all patients with T1b oesophageal adenocarcinoma on endoscopic mucosal resection who underwent surgery - comparison of endoscopic and surgical resection specimens’ pathology report
Case
Endoscopic resection specimen
Surgical resection specimen
Note
1
Sm1, G3, LVI-, R1
T1a, LVI-, R0
/
2
Sm1, G3, LVI-, R1
T1b Sm1, G3, R0
/
3
SmX, G2, LVI-, R1
T1b, G3, LVI-, R0
/
4
Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1
No residual cancer
LGD in surgical margin
5
Sm1, G2, LVI-, R1
No residual cancer
HGD in surgical margin
6
Sm1, G3, LVI-, R1
T1b, G2, R0
/
7
Sm2/3, G3, LVI+, R1
T1a, G3, R0
Positive for LNM (2/16)
8
Sm2/3, G2, LVI-, R1
No residual cancer
LGD in surgical margin
9
Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1
No residual cancer
/
10
Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1
T1a, G3, LVI+, R0
/
11
Sm2/3, G3, LVIX, R1
T1b, G2, R0
Positive for LNM (3/12)
12
Sm2/3, G3, LVI+, R1
T2, G3, R1
R1, negative for LNM (16), preop EUS T1b
13
Sm2/3, G2, LVI+, R1
No residual cancer
/
14
Sm1, G3, LVI+, R1
T1b, G1, LVI-, R0
/
15
SmX, G3, LVI+, R1
T1b, G3, R0
Positive for LNM (1/23)
16
Sm2/3, G3, LVI+, R1
No residual cancer
/
17
Sm1, G3, LVIX, R1
T2, R0
Preop EUS T1 stage
18
SmX, G3, LVI+, R1
T3, G3, R0
Positive for LNM (3/78), preop EUS T1b
19
Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1
T1a, G3, R0
/
20
Sm2/3, G2, LVI-, R1
T1, R0
/
21
SmX, G3, LVI-, R1
No residual cancer
/
22
Sm1, G2, LVI-, R0
No residual cancer
LR tumour, HGD in surgical margin
Table 4 Overview of patients with metastatic T1b OAC
Citation: Graham D, Sever N, Magee C, Waddingham W, Banks M, Sweis R, Al-Yousuf H, Mitchison M, Alzoubaidi D, Rodriguez-Justo M, Lovat L, Novelli M, Jansen M, Haidry R. Risk of lymph node metastases in patients with T1b oesophageal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective single centre experience. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(41): 4698-4707