Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2018; 24(30): 3361-3373
Published online Aug 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i30.3361
Published online Aug 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i30.3361
Table 1 Diagnostic criteria for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease according to the various guidelines
EASL | NICE | Asia-Pacific | AISF | AASLD | |
Required criteria | Steatosis in > 5% of hepatocytes by either imaging or histology | Excessive fat in the liver | Hepatic steatosis by either imaging or histology | Hepatic steatosis on either imaging or histology | Evidence of hepatic steatosis either by imaging or histology |
No other causes of steatosis | No other causes of steatosis | No other causes of steatosis | No other causes of steatosis | No other causes of steatosis | |
Insulin resistance | No significant alcohol consumption | No significant alcohol consumption | No significant alcohol consumption | No significant alcohol consumption | |
No coexisting chronic liver disease | |||||
Alcohol consumption threshold (men) | 30 g/d | 30 g/d | 2 standard drink/d | 30 g/d | 21 standard drink/wk |
140 g/wk | 294 g/wk | ||||
Alcohol consumption threshold (women) | 20 g/d | 20 g/d | 1 standard drink/d | 20 g/d | 14 standard drink/wk |
70 g/wk | 196 g/wk |
Table 2 Comparative analysis of the recommendations regarding the screening for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
EASL | NICE | Asia-Pacific | AISF | AASLD | |
Systematic screening | No | No | No | No | No |
Screening in high-risk groups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not mentioned | No1 |
Obesity | Obesity | Obesity | |||
Metabolic syndrome | Type II Diabetes | Type II Diabetes | |||
Abnormal liver enzymes | |||||
Screening modality | Yes liver enzymes | No liver enzymes | No liver enzymes | ||
Yes ultrasonography | Yes ultrasonography | ||||
Yes transient elastography |
Table 3 Comparison of recommendations about non-invasive evaluation of fibrosis and follow up strategies
EASL | NICE | Asia-Pacific | AISF | AASLD | |
Non-invasive evaluation | NFS and FIB-4 upon diagnosis. If inconclusive, perform transient elastography | ELF blood test | Combination of serum tests and imaging tools (no specification about the preferred tests) | NFS + FIB-4 upon diagnosis. If inconclusive, perform transient elastography | NFS, FIB-4 and transient elastography (or MRE) upon diagnosis |
Follow up | Negative markers > reassess every 2 yr; Fibrosis or abnormal liver enzymes > reassess every year; Cirrhosis-> surveillance every 6 mo | Negative ELF test, > reassess every 3 yr; Positive ELF test > liver biopsy | No information provided | Negative markers > reassess every 2 yr; Fibrosis or abnormal liver enzymes > reassess every year; Cirrhosis > surveillance every 6 mo | No information provided |
Table 4 Guidance statements about lifestyle interventions
EASL | NICE | Asia-Pacific | AISF | AASLD | |
Dietary restrictions | 500-1000 kcal deficit; weight loss of 500-1000 g/wk with a 7%-10% total weight loss | Main recommendations on diet of NICE’s obesity and preventing excess weight gain guidelines | 500-1000 kcal deficit | 1200-1600 kcal/d; fat-low (< 30% of total calories); carbohydrate-low (< 50% of total calories) | 500-1000 kcal deficit |
Physical activity | Aerobic and resistance training (150-200 min/wk in 3-5 sessions) | Main recommendation of on physical activity of NICE’s obesity and preventing excess weight gain guidelines | Aerobic and resistance training | Aerobic and resistance training | Aerobic and resistance training (> 150 min/wk) |
Gold standard diet | Low-to-moderate fat and moderate-to-high carbohydrate intake | No specific suggestions | All, excluding very low-calorie diets | Mediterranean diet | No specific suggestions |
Low-carbohydrate ketogenic diets or high-protein | |||||
Mediterranean diet |
Table 5 Recommendations about pharmacological treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
EASL | NICE | ASIA-PACIFIC | AISF | AASLD | |
Metformin | Insufficient evidence | Not beneficial | Not beneficial | Not mentioned | Not beneficial |
Vitamin E | Insufficient evidence | Consider use regardless of diabetes | Not beneficial | Insufficient evidence | Consider use in non-diabetic, biopsy-proven NASH |
PPAR-gamma agonists | Consider use in selected diabetic patients | Consider pioglitazone in adults regardless of diabetes | Insufficient evidence in Asian | Insufficient evidence, potentially useful | Pioglitazone indicated in biopsy-proven NASH (regardless of diabetes) |
PUFA | Not beneficial | Insufficient evidence | Not beneficial | Not mentioned | Not beneficial |
Pentoxifylline | Insufficient evidence | Not mentioned | Not beneficial | Not mentioned | Not mentioned |
GLP-1 analogues | Insufficient evidence, potentially useful | Insufficient evidence | Insufficient evidence in Asian patients | Insufficient evidence, potentially useful | Insufficient evidence |
UDCA | Not beneficial | Not beneficial | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not beneficial |
Obetycolic acid | Scarce evidence | Not mentioned | waiting for ongoing RCT results | Waiting for ongoing RCT results | Insufficient evidence |
Silymarin | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | insufficient evidence, potentially useful | Not mentioned | Not mentioned |
Statins | Safe but not beneficial | Safe but not beneficial | Safe but not beneficial | Safe but not beneficial | Safe but not beneficial |
- Citation: Leoni S, Tovoli F, Napoli L, Serio I, Ferri S, Bolondi L. Current guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(30): 3361-3373
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i30/3361.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i30.3361