Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2018; 24(3): 379-386
Published online Jan 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i3.379
Published online Jan 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i3.379
Table 1 Cause of conversion n (%)
Cause of conversion | SPLH | MPLH |
(n = 35, 22.6%) | (n = 18, 19.8%) | |
Bleeding | 21 (60.0) | 6 (33.3) |
Adhesion | 3 (8.5) | 4 (22.2) |
Poor localization of tumor | 3 (8.5) | 2 (11.1) |
Advanced tumor | 2 (5.7) | 1 (5.6) |
Technical failure | 5 (14.3) | 3 (16.7) |
Others | 1 (3.0) | 2 (11.1) |
Table 2 Comparison of procedure between single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy and multi-port laparoscopic hepatectomy group n (%)
Name of procedure | SPLH | MPLH |
(n = 155, 63.0%) | (n = 91, 37.0%) | |
Right hepatectomy | 5 (3.2) | 0 |
Left hepatectomy | 17 (10.9) | 12 (13.2) |
Left lateral sesctionectomy | 29 (18.7) | 19 (20.8) |
Segmentectomy | 2 (1.3) | 3 (3.3) |
Partial hepatectomy | 101 (65.2) | 36 (39.6) |
Extended cholecystectomy | 0 | 14 (15.4) |
Others | 1 (0.7) | 7 (7.7) |
Table 3 Comparison of results between single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy and multi-port laparoscopic hepatectomy group n (%)
Variables | SPLH | MPLH | P value |
(n = 155, 63.0%) | (n = 91, 37.0%) | ||
Age | 57.1 ± 13.3 | 60.8 ± 13.4 | 0.037 |
Sex (M:F) | 105:50 | 49:42 | 0.040 |
BMI | 24.1 ± 3.1 | 22.5 ± 2.9 | < 0.001 |
Liver cirrhosis | 51 (32.9) | 31 (34.3) | 0.887 |
CTP score | 5.37 ± 0.73 | 5.21 ± 0.64 | 0.297 |
Malignant disease | 116 (74.8) | 64 (70.3) | 0.459 |
Major operation | 21 (13.5) | 12 (13.3) | 0.962 |
Operation time | 136.9 ± 89.2 | 231.2 ± 149.7 | < 0.001 |
Blood loss (mL) | 385.1 ± 409.3 | 559.9 ± 624.9 | 0.016 |
RBC T/F (unit) | 0.62 ± 1.98 | 0.79 ± 1.44 | 0.513 |
Conversion rate | 35 (22.6) | 18 (19.8) | 0.358 |
Enteral feeding (d) | 1.06 ± 0.27 | 1.63 ± 1.27 | < 0.001 |
Hospital stay (d) | 7.82 ± 2.79 | 7.97 ± 3.69 | 0.744 |
Disease free margin | 0.84 ± 0.84 | 1.04 ± 1.22 | 0.704 |
Complication rate | 12 (7.7) | 3 (3.3) | 0.397 |
Post op bleeding | 1 (8.3) | 0 | |
Pleural effusion | 4 (33.3) | 1 (33.3) | |
Fluid accumulation | 6 (50.1) | 1 (33.3) | |
Others | 1 (8.3) | 1 (33.3) |
Table 4 Comparison of results between single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy and multi-port laparoscopic hepatectomy group in left hepatectomy and left lateral sectionectomy n (%)
Variables | SPLH | MPLH | P value |
(n = 46, 59.7%) | (n = 31, 40.3%) | ||
Age | 59.0 ± 11.1 | 62.0 ± 9.9 | 0.223 |
Sex (M:F) | 26:20 | 16:15 | 0.816 |
BMI | 23.3 ± 2.8 | 22.7 ± 2.5 | 0.337 |
Liver cirrhosis | 9 (19.6) | 4 (12.9) | 0.525 |
CTP score | 5.44 ± 0.81 | 5.20 ± 0.56 | 0.355 |
Malignant disease | 27 (58.7) | 12 (38.7) | 0.106 |
Operation time | 177.9 ± 114.6 | 277.6 ± 140.6 | 0.003 |
Blood loss (mL) | 389.0 ± 270.0 | 576.9 ± 298.1 | 0.013 |
RBC T/F (unit) | 0.38 ± 0.9 | 0.83 ± 0.9 | 0.094 |
Conversion rate | 15 (32.6) | 8 (25.8) | 0.616 |
Enteral feeding (d) | 1.08 ± 0.35 | 1.61 ± 0.89 | < 0.001 |
Hospital stay (d) | 9.08 ± 3.21 | 9.36 ± 3.19 | 0.738 |
Disease free margin (cm) | 1.17 ± 0.99 | 1.67 ± 1.92 | 0.354 |
Complication rate | 4 (8.7) | 1 (3.2) | 0.402 |
Post op bleeding | 1 (25.0) | ||
Pleural effusion | 0 | ||
Fluid accumulation | 2 (50.0) | ||
Others | 1 (25.0) | 1 (100) |
- Citation: Han JH, You YK, Choi HJ, Hong TH, Kim DG. Clinical advantages of single port laparoscopic hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(3): 379-386
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i3/379.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i3.379