Comparing outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection between Eastern and Western countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i23.2518

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 24, Issue 23

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (12752)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

805

WORD

353

HTML

5713

Figures (1-4)

511

Tables (1-1)

484

Sum=7866

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

895

Download

1006

Sum=1901

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1155

Download

1830

Sum=2985

Jun 21, 2018 (publication date) through Oct 22, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (68)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

- Full Article with Cover (PDF)
- Full Article (XML)

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2018; 24(23): 2518-2536
Published online Jun 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i23.2518

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies and patients

	Total	Eastern countries	Western countries
Age (yr)¹	66.4	66.4	66
Total number of patients (n)	84318	82183	2135
Total number of lesions (n)	89512	87296	2216
Esophagus	5597	5276	321
Stomach	59966	59173	793
Duodenum	15	8	7
Colorectum	23934	22839	1095
Lesion diameter (mm)¹	26	25.7	34.1
Procedure time (min)¹	78	77	110
Total number of studies	239	216	23
Randomized controlled trial	7	7	0
Prospective studies	61	53	11
Retrospective studies	168	156	12
Full-text	140	130	10
Abstract	99	86	13

¹Weighted average, with number of patients in study used as weights.

Full Size Table

Citation: Daoud DC, Suter N, Durand M, Bouin M, Faulques B, von Renteln D. Comparing outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection between Eastern and Western countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(23): 2518-2536
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i23/2518.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i23.2518