Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2017; 23(9): 1627-1636
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1627
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1627
Table 1 Patient characteristics and endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography related data n (%) (n = 244)
Characteristics | Value |
Age (yr), mean ± SD (range) | 70.8 ± 10.2 (44-95) |
Sex | |
Male | 130 (53.3) |
Female | 114 (46.7) |
Aspirin | 3 (1.2) |
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), pre-procedure, mean ± SD (range) | 7.09 ± 6.45 (0.2-28.9) |
Normal | 53 (21.7) |
Elevated | 191 (78.3) |
Hyperamylasemia, pre-procedure | 14 (5.7) |
Cholangitis, pre-procedure | 68 (27.9) |
Diagnosis | |
Cholangiocarcinoma | 118 (48.4) |
Hilar | 75 (63.6) |
Distal | 43 (36.4) |
Pancreatic cancer | 79 (32.4) |
Head | 68 (86.1) |
Body/Tail | 11 (13.9) |
Gallbladder cancer | 21 (8.6) |
Ampullary cancer | 18 (7.4) |
Hepatocellular carcinoma | 3 (1.2) |
Others | 5 (2.0) |
Pancreatic duct invasion | |
Yes | 85 (34.8) |
No | 159 (65.2) |
Lymph node metastasis | |
Yes | 170 (69.7) |
No | 73 (29.9) |
Pancreatic duct injection | |
0 | 187 (76.6) |
1-2 | 24 (9.8) |
≥ 3 | 33 (13.5) |
ERPD | 4 (1.6) |
Stent success rate | 244 (100) |
Number of initially inserted SEMS | |
1 | 230 (94.3) |
2 | 14 (5.7) |
Stent type | |
Uncovered | 190 (77.9) |
Covered | 54 (22.1) |
Post-ERCP complication | |
Present | 9 (3.7) |
Absent' | 234 (95.9) |
Post-ERCP complication type | |
Pancreatitis | 7 (2.9) |
Mild / moderate | 6 (2.5)/1 (0.4) |
Bleeding, mild | 2 (0.8) |
Perforation | 0 (0) |
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia | 30 (12.3) |
Stent complication | |
None | 199 (81.6) |
Stent occlusion | 44 (18.0) |
Stent migration | 1 (0.4) |
Patency | |
No further procedure | 199 (81.6) |
ERBD restent | 1 (0.4) |
SEMS restent | 32 (13.1) |
PTBD | 12 (4.9) |
Table 2 Characteristics and complications according to the cancer type n (%)
Cholangiocarcinoman = 118 | Pancreatic cancern = 79 | non-pancreaticobiliary cancern = 47 | P value | |
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 73.5 ± 9.4 | 67.8 ± 10.4 | 69.3 ± 10.3 | 0.002 |
Hyperamylasemia, pre-procedure | 6 (5.1) | 3 (3.8) | 5 (10.6) | 0.273 |
Cholangitis, pre-procedure | 28 (23.7) | 19 (24.1) | 21 (44.7) | 0.021 |
Pancreatic duct invasion | < 0.001 | |||
Yes | 12 (10.2) | 64 (81.0) | 9 (19.1) | |
No | 106 (89.8) | 15 (19.0) | 38 (80.9) | |
Lymph node metastasis | 0.345 | |||
Yes | 77 (65.3) | 58 (73.4) | 35 (74.5) | |
No | 41 (34.7) | 21 (26.6) | 12 (25.5) | |
Pancreatic duct injection | 0.606 | |||
0 | 92 (78.0) | 59 (74.7) | 36 (76.6) | |
1-2 | 8 (6.8) | 9 (11.4) | 7 (14.9) | |
≥ 3 | 18 (15.3) | 11 (13.9) | 4 (8.5) | |
Number of initially inserted SEMS | 0.004 | |||
1 | 106 (89.8) | 79 (100.0) | 45 (95.7) | |
2 | 12 (10.2) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (4.3) | |
Post-ERCP complication | 0.696 | |||
Present | 5 (4.2) | 2 (2.5) | 2 (4.3) | |
Absent | 113 (95.8) | 77 (97.5) | 45 (95.7) | |
Post-ERCP complication type | 0.914 | |||
Pancreatitis | 4 (3.4) | 1 (1.3) | 2 (4.3) | 0.681 |
Mild/moderate | 3 (2.5)/1 (0.8) | 1 (1.3)/0 (0) | 2 (4.3)/0 (0) | |
Bleeding, mild | 1 (0.8) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) | |
Perforation | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia | 13 (11.0) | 9 (11.4) | 8 (17.0) | |
Stent complication | 0.539 | |||
None | 90 (76.3) | 70 (88.6) | 39 (83.0) | |
Stent occlusion | 27 (22.9) | 9 (11.4) | 8 (17.0) | |
Stent migration | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Patency | 0.161 | |||
No further procedure | 90 (76.3) | 70 (88.6) | 39 (83) | |
ERBD restent | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
SEMS restent | 20 (16.9) | 9 (11.4) | 3 (6.4) | |
PTBD | 7 (5.9) | 0 (0) | 5 (10.6) |
Table 3 Rates of complications on biliary stenting with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy according to location of cholangiocarcinoma n (%)
Hilarn = 75 | Distaln = 43 | P value | |
Post-ERCP complication type | 0.717 | ||
Pancreatitis | 3 (4.0) | 1 (2.3) | |
Mild/moderate | 2 (2.7)/1 (1.3) | 1 (2.3)/0 (0) | |
Bleeding, mild | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
Perforation | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia | 7 (9.3) | 5 (11.6) | |
Stent complication | 0.756 | ||
None | 57 (76.0) | 33 (76.7) | 1.000 |
Stent occlusion | 17 (22.7) | 10 (23.3) | |
Stent migration | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0.0) |
Table 4 Rates of complications on biliary stenting with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy according to location of pancreatic cancer
Headn = 68 | Body/tailn = 11 | P value | |
Post-ERCP complication type | 1.000 | ||
Pancreatitis | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
Mild/moderate | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
Bleeding, mild | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
Perforation | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia | 8 (11.8) | 2 (18.2) | 0.624 |
Stent complication | 1.000 | ||
None | 60 (88.2) | 10 (90.9) | |
Stent occlusion | 8 (11.8) | 1 (9.1) | |
Stent migration | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Table 5 Rates of complications on biliary stenting with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy according to stent type
Uncoveredn = 190 | Coveredn = 54 | P value | |
Normal | 181 (95.3) | 49 (90.7) | |
Abnormal | 9 (4.7) | 5 (9.3) | |
Post-ERCP complication | 1.000 | ||
Present | 7 (3.7) | 2 (3.7) | |
Absent' | 183 (96.3) | 52 (96.3) | |
Post-ERCP complication type | 0.838 | ||
Pancreatitis | 5 (2.6) | 2 (3.7) | |
Mild / moderate | 4 (2.1) / 1 (0.5) | 2 (3.7) / 0 (0) | |
Bleeding, mild | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0) | |
Perforation | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia | 25 (13.2) | 5 (9.3) | 0.638 |
Stent complication | 0.758 | ||
None | 156 (82.1) | 43 (79.6) | |
Stent occlusion | 33 (17.4) | 11 (20.4) | |
Stent migration | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) | |
Patency | 0.012 | ||
No further procedure | 156 (82.1) | 43 (79.6) | |
ERBD restent | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) | |
SEMS restent | 28 (14.7) | 4 (7.4) | |
PTBD | 5 (2.6) | 7 (13) |
Table 6 Characteristics according to complications on biliary stenting with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy n (%)
No complicationn = 235 | Complicationn = 9 | P value | |
Age (yr), mean ± SD (range) | 70.61 ± 10.33 | 75.27 ± 5.55 | 0.993 |
Gender | 1.000 | ||
Male | 126 (53.6) | 5 (55.5) | |
Female | 109 (46.6) | 4 (44.5) | |
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), pre-procedure, mean ± SD | 7.00 ± 6.46 | 8.38 ± 6.54 | 0.362 |
Normal | 52 (22.2) | 1 (11.1) | 0.453 |
Elevated | 183 (77.8) | 8 (88.9) | |
Hyperamylasemia, pre-procedure | 13 (5.5) | 1 (11.1) | 0.485 |
Cholangitis, pre-procedure | 64 (27.2) | 4 (44.4) | 0.472 |
Diagnosis | 0.748 | ||
Cholangiocarcinoma | 112 (47.6) | 6 (66.7) | |
Hilar | 71 (30.2) | 4 (44.4) | |
Distal | 41 (17.4) | 2 (22.2) | |
Pancreatic cancer | 77 (32.8) | 2 (22.2) | |
Head | 66 (28.1) | 2 (22.2) | |
Body/tail | 11 (4.7) | 0 (0.0) | |
Gallbladder cancer | 20 (8.5) | 1 (11.1) | |
Ampullary cancer | 18 (7.7) | 0 (0.0) | |
Hepatocellular carcinoma | 3 (1.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
Others | 5 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
Pancreatic duct invasion | 0.324 | ||
Yes | 80 (34.0) | 5 (55.6) | |
No | 155 (66.0) | 4 (44.4) | |
Lymph node metastasis | 0.176 | ||
Yes | 166 (70.6) | 5 (55.6) | |
No | 69 (29.4) | 4 (44.4) | |
Pancreatic duct injection | 0.662 | ||
0 | 181 (77.0) | 6 (66.7) | |
1-2 | 23 (9.8) | 1 (11.1) | |
≥ 3 | 31 (13.2) | 2 (22.2) | |
Number of inserted SEMS | 0.031 | ||
1 | 224 (95.3) | 7 (77.8) | |
2 | 11 (4.7) | 2 (22.2) | |
Stent type | 1.000 | ||
Uncovered | 183 (77.9) | 7 (77.8) | |
Covered | 52 (22.1) | 2 (22.2) | |
Stent complication | 1.000 | ||
Stent occlusion | 42 (17.9) | 2 (22.2) | |
Stent migration | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
Patency | 0.512 | ||
No further procedure | 192 (81.7) | 7 (77.8) | |
ERBD restent | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
SEMS restent | 31 (13.2) | 1 (11.1) | |
PTBD | 11 (4.7) | 1 (11.1) |
- Citation: Nam HS, Kang DH, Kim HW, Choi CW, Park SB, Kim SJ, Ryu DG. Efficacy and safety of limited endoscopic sphincterotomy before self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant biliary obstruction. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(9): 1627-1636
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i9/1627.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1627