Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2017; 23(5): 891-898
Published online Feb 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i5.891
Published online Feb 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i5.891
Table 1 Baseline demographics
Subjects | n = 36 |
Sex, F/M | 12/24 |
Age, median (range) | 71 (48-86) |
Underlying disease | |
Perforation | |
Gastric | 1 |
Small intestine | 2 |
Colo/rectal | 8 |
Abscess/bacteremia | 12 |
Ileus | 3 |
Pancreatitis | 2 |
Pneumonia | 5 |
Drug-induced | 3 |
Peri-operative, no/yes | 10/26 |
Cancer-associated, no/yes | 23/13 |
Post-operative day, ≤ 7/> 7 | 21/5 |
Combination treatment for DIC | |
Unfractionated heparins | 4 |
Anti-thrombin concentrates | 28 |
γ-globulin agents | 29 |
Vasopressors | 26 |
Protease inhibitors | 4 |
Sivelestat sodium hydrates | 4 |
Steroid preparations | 7 |
Dialysis | 5 |
Blood transfusion | 4 |
Table 2 Patient characteristics
Subjects | n = 36 | |
DIC scores | 4 | 15 |
Before the treatment | 5 | 9 |
(JAAM criteria) | 6 | 8 |
7 | 1 | |
8 | 3 | |
SIRS scores | 0/1 | 5 |
Before the treatment | 2 | 9 |
3 | 15 | |
4 | 7 | |
qSOFA scores | 0 | 10 |
Before the treatment | 1 | 4 |
2 | 17 | |
3 | 5 | |
Duration of DIC | -2/-1 | 4 |
Before the administration of TM-α (d) | 0 | 16 |
1 | 10 | |
2 | 1 | |
3 | 4 | |
≥ 4 | 1 | |
Duration of administration | 1 | 5 |
2 | 5 | |
3 | 3 | |
4 | 3 | |
5 | 9 | |
6 | 4 | |
≥ 7 | 7 |
Table 3 Reasons for discontinuation of thrombomodulin-α
Duration (d) | Total number | Cases | Reasons |
1 | 5 | 2 | Dialysis |
3 | Bleeding tendency | ||
2 | 5 | 3 | Death |
2 | Bleeding tendency | ||
3 | 3 | 1 | Resolved |
2 | Bleeding tendency | ||
4 | 3 | 3 | Resolved |
Table 4 Survival analysis at 28 d after thrombomodulin-α administration
Factor | n = 31 | 28-d survival rate | P value | |
Sex | Male | 22 | 73% | 0.83 |
Female | 9 | 67% | ||
Age | ≤ 70 | 14 | 64% | 0.54 |
> 70 | 17 | 76% | ||
Duration of administration | ≥ 4, ≤ 6 | 16 | 88% | 0.03 |
≤ 3, ≥ 7 | 15 | 53% | ||
Initiation of administration after DIC (d) | ≤ 1 | 27 | 74% | 0.43 |
≥ 2 | 4 | 50% | ||
DIC scores before the treatment | ≤ 5 | 21 | 67% | 0.52 |
≥ 6 | 10 | 80% | ||
Improvement in DIC scores at 1 wk | ≤ 3 | 14 | 93% | 0.01 |
≥ 4 | 17 | 53% | ||
SIRS scores before the treatment | ≤ 2 | 12 | 58% | 0.2 |
≥ 3 | 19 | 79% | ||
Improvement in SIRS scores at 1 wk | ≤ 2 | 21 | 86% | 0.09 |
≥ 3 | 7 | 57% | ||
qSOFA scores before the treatment | ≤ 1 | 11 | 73% | 0.8 |
≥ 2 | 20 | 70% | ||
Improvement in qSOFA scores at 1 wk | ≤ 1 | 22 | 91% | 0.001 |
≥ 2 | 6 | 33% | ||
Sepsis | Present | 20 | 70% | 0.8 |
Absent | 11 | 73% | ||
Shock | Present | 16 | 81% | 0.24 |
Absent | 15 | 60% | ||
Lactate values before the treatment | ≥ 2 | 8 | 75% | 0.69 |
< 2 | 18 | 83% |
Table 5 Relationships between treatment initiation and patient demographics
Factor | Treatment initiation after DIC | P value | ||
≤ 0 d | ≥ 1 d | |||
Duration of administration | ≥ 4, ≤ 6 | 9 | 7 | 0.94 |
≤ 3, ≥ 7 | 11 | 9 | ||
DIC scores before the treatment | ≤ 5 | 12 | 12 | 0.34 |
≥ 6 | 8 | 4 | ||
SIRS scores before the treatment | ≤ 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.22 |
≥ 3 | 14 | 8 | ||
qSOFA scores before the treatment | ≤ 1 | 3 | 11 | 0.001 |
≥ 2 | 17 | 5 | ||
Sepsis | Present | 17 | 5 | 0.001 |
Absent | 3 | 11 | ||
Shock | Present | 13 | 4 | 0.02 |
Absent | 7 | 12 | ||
Lactate values before the treatment | ≤ 3 | 6 | 10 | 0.02 |
> 3 | 11 | 3 |
- Citation: Konishi H, Okamoto K, Shoda K, Arita T, Kosuga T, Morimura R, Komatsu S, Murayama Y, Shiozaki A, Kuriu Y, Ikoma H, Nakanishi M, Ichikawa D, Fujiwara H, Otsuji E. Early thrombomodulin-α administration outcome for acute disseminated intravascular coagulopathy in gastrointestinal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(5): 891-898
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i5/891.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i5.891