Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2017; 23(34): 6273-6280
Published online Sep 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6273
Table 1 Comparison of the characteristics and the target biliary duct status of patients in the success and failure groups
Success (n = 49)Failure (n = 13)P value
Age, median (range), yr74 (42-88)71 (16-76)0.45
Sex (male), n (%)33 (67.3)8 (61.5)0.75
Diagnoses
Primary lesion (Biliary tract or pancreatic cancer)40100.70
Metastases93
Pancreatic cancer1
Lung cancer1
Tracheal cancer1
Colon cancer32
Uterine cancer1
Gastric cancer11
Prostatic cancer1
Bismuth classification0.98
II123
III185
IV195
Target biliary duct status,
Diameter of the target biliary duct, median (range), mm6.4 (2.0-15.9)6.6 (4.4-17.3)10.45
Diameter of the target biliary stricture, median (range), mm0 (0-1.6)0 (0-0.9)0.94
Diameter of the first implanted SEMS, median (range), mm5.8 (3.1-11.7)6.7 (3.4-12.6)0.25
Length of the target biliary stricture, median (range), mm11.0 (3.0-69.6)7.9 (1.7-34.2)10.44
Angle between the target biliary duct stricture and the first implanted SEMS, median (range), degree44.4 (7-119)75.3 (28-109.3)1< 0.01
Table 2 Comparison of the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures and outcomes employed in the success and failure groups n (%)
Success (n = 49)Failure (n = 13)P value
Procedure time, median (range), min70 (20-160)90 (40-150)10.30
Clinically effective rate49 (100)11 (84.6)0.04
Adverse effects1 (2)1 (7.7)0.38
Post-ERCP pancreatitis10
Perforation of biliary duct01
Wire passage of the first SEMS cell49 (100)9 (69.2)0.006
Diameter of wire (0.025/0.035)32/1426/610.31
Catheter usage to dilate the a first SEMS cell2480.54
Catheter passage of the first SEMS cell22 (92)4 (50)0.02
Dilator usage to dilate first SEMS cell1851.00
Dilator passage of the first SEMS cell17 (94)2 (40)0.02
Balloon catheter usage to dilate the first SEMS lumen511.00
Balloon catheter usage to dilate the first SEMS cell1830.51
Balloon catheter passage of the first SEMS cell18 (100)0 (0)< 0.001
The number of used dilation devices, median (range)1 (0-3)1 (0-3)0.79
Type of first SEMS used (braided/laser), n41/89/40.26
Stenting order0.22
Left→Left21
Left→Right286
Right→Left126
Right→Right70
Procedure sessions0.328
14213
270
Area of first SEMS cell, median (range), mm218.3 (3.5-39.3)18.3 (3.5-18.3)30.59
Table 3 Comparison of the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures procedures employed in the success and failure groups (Angle between the target biliary duct stricture and the first implanted self-expandable metallic stent > 49.7 degrees) n (%)
Success (n = 19)Failure (n = 12)P value
Diameter of the first implanted SEMS, median (range), mm6.2 (3.1-15.9)6.5 (4.4-17.3)0.16
Wire passage of the first SEMS cell19 (100)8 (69.2)0.02
Diameter of wire (0.025/0.035)12/615/610.44
Catheter usage to dilate the a first SEMS cell870.47
Catheter passage of the first SEMS cell87.5 (7/8)42.9 (3/7)0.12
Dilator usage to dilate first SEMS cell641.00
Dilator passage of the first SEMS cell6 (100)1 (25)0.03
Balloon catheter usage to dilate the first SEMS lumen111.00
Balloon catheter usage to dilate the first SEMS cell720.42
Balloon catheter passage of the first SEMS cell7 (100)0 (0)0.03
The number of used dilation devices, median (range)1 (0-2)1 (0-3)0.76
Type of first SEMS used (braided/laser)13/68/41.00
Stenting order0.53
Left→Left11
Left→Right125
Right→Left66
Procedure sessions0.27
11612
230
Area of first SEMS cell, median (range), mm218.3 (3.5-18.3)18.3 (3.5-18.3)20.96