Ntavatzikos A, Spathis A, Patapis P, Machairas N, Peros G, Konstantoudakis S, Leventakou D, Panayiotides IG, Karakitsos P, Koumarianou A. Integrating TYMS, KRAS and BRAF testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(32): 5913-5924 [PMID: 28932083 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i32.5913]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Anastasios Ntavatzikos, MD, General Surgeon, Research Scientist, Hematology-Oncology Unit, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “ATTIKON” University Hospital, Rimini 1, Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece. dmaal2@yahoo.gr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Association between thymidylate synthase polymorphisms and patient characteristics
Polymorphism
Characteristic
RR (95%CI)
P value
2R
Age < 65-years-old
1.708 (1.158-2.520)
0.090
2RG/3RG
Grade 1-2
1.449 (1.077-1.948)
0.044
2RG/3RC
Female
1.943 (1.152-3.275)
0.036
ins/ins
KRAS G12D
3.563 (1.163-10.912)
0.045
3RG/3RC
KRAS wild-type
1.753 (1.156-2.657)
0.031
Table 4 Risk groups of thymidylate synthase polymorphisms
Group
Relapsed
De novo metastatic
Total
TYMS 5’UTR
Low expression
2RG
2 (4.2)
6 (14.6)
8 (9.0)
2RG/3RC
8 (16.7)
3 (7.3)
11 (12.4)
3RC
6 (12.5)
5 (12.2)
11 (12.4)
Medium expression
2RG/3RG
4 (8.3)
4 (9.8)
8 (9)
2RG/3RCLOH
7 (14.6)
3 (7.3)
10 (11.2)
2RG/3RGLOH
3 (6.3)
2 (4.9)
5 (5.6)
2RGLOH/3RC
1 (2.1)
2 (4.9)
3 (3.4)
High expression
3RG
4 (8.3)
4 (9.8)
8 (9.0)
3RG/3RC
9 (18.8)
8 (19.5)
17 (19.1)
2RGLOH/3RG
4 (8.3)
4 (9.8)
8 (9.0)
TYMS 3’UTR
Low expression
del/del
6 (12.5)
7 (17.1)
13 (14.6)
Medium expression
ins/del
19 (39.6)
10 (24.4)
29 (32.6)
del/LOH
1 (2.1)
3 (7.3)
4 (4.5)
High expression
ins/ins
8 (16.7)
13 (31.7)
21 (23.6)
ins/LOH
14 (29.2)
8 (19.5)
22 (24.7)
Table 5 Univariate Cox regression analysis for clinicopathological features and genotype
Variable
PFS
OS
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
KRAS mutated
1.390
0.895-2.164
0.142
1.669
0.996-2.797
0.052
BRAF V600E
0.884
0.356-2.196
0.791
1.514
0.545-4.207
0.426
LOH
1.013
0.632-1.624
0.957
1.020
0.592-1.758
0.944
TYMS 5’UTR
0.561
0.845
2R
1.000
1.000
2R/3R
1.243
0.616-2.508
0.543
1.276
0.556-2.928
0.565
3R
0.974
0.474-2.003
0.944
1.239
0.535-2.870
0.616
TYMS 5’UTR
0.887
0.486
2RG
1.000
1.000
2RG/3RC
1.151
0.535-2.475
0.720
0.978
0.388-2.468
0.963
2RG/3RG
1.351
0.625-2.921
0.444
1.688
0.689-4.132
0.252
3RC
1.038
0.428-2.517
0.935
0.876
0.293-2.620
0.813
3RG/3RC
0.883
0.391-1.995
0.764
1.648
0.660-4.113
0.284
3RG
1.107
0.433-2.832
0.832
1.054
0.348-3.189
0.926
TYMS 5’UTR
0.726
0.562
2R
1.000
1.000
2RG/3RC
1.864
0.738-4.713
0.188
1.678
0.546-5.160
0.366
2RG/3RCLOH
0.783
0.300-2.044
0.617
1.044
0.328-3.323
0.942
2RG/3RG
1.058
0.372-3.014
0.916
1.869
0.537-6.504
0.325
2RG/3RGLOH
1.936
0.630-5.948
0.248
3.875
1.019-14.740
0.047
2RGLOH/3RC
1.155
0.301-4.441
0.834
1.091
0.126-9.412
0.937
2RGLOH/3RG
1.656
0.617-4.442
0.317
1.745
0.546-5.576
0.348
3RC
1.096
0.428-2.806
0.848
1.070
0.325-3.521
0.912
3RG
1.163
0.432-3.134
0.765
1.281
0.385-4.270
0.687
3RG/3RC
1.001
0.413-2.426
0.998
2.144
0.758-6.064
0.151
TYMS 5’UTR groups
0.812
0.489
Low expression
1.063
0.633-1.784
0.818
0.696
0.384-1.261
0.232
Medium expression
0.888
0.518-1.523
0.667
0.851
0.460-1.572
0.606
High expression
1.000
1.000
TYMS 3’UTR
0.295
0.340
del/del
0.602
0.305-1.190
0.144
0.563
0.259-1.224
0.147
ins/del
0.764
0.475-1.228
0.267
0.910
0.522-1.587
0.739
ins/ins
1.000
1.000
TYMS 3’UTR
0.067
1
0.095
del/del
0.421
0.194-0.912
0.028
0.311
0.125-0.772
0.012
del/LOH
0.784
0.263-2.334
0.662
0.773
0.175-3.417
0.734
ins/del
0.438
0.240-0.802
0.007
0.459
0.230-0.918
0.028
ins/LOH
0.516
0.274-0.973
0.041
0.488
0.233-1.020
0.057
ins/ins
1.000
1.000
TYMS 3’UTR groups
0.225
0.187
Low expression
0.639
0.323-1.263
0.198
0.503
0.230-1.102
0.086
Medium expression
0.435
0.435-1.118
0.135
0.738
0.426-1.279
0.279
High expression
1.000
1.000
Table 6 Multivariate Cox regression analysis
PFS
OS
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
KRAS mutated
1.600
1.011-2.531
0.045
LOH
1.674
0.912-3.071
0.096
Fluoropyrimidine-based CT
With irinotecan
0.600
0.372-0.969
0.037
0.352
0.164-0.757
0.007
Without irinotecan
1.000
1.000
With oxaliplatin
1.000
Without oxaliplatin
2.702
1.273-5.738
0.010
TYMS 3’UTR groups
0.043
0.027
Low expression
0.432
0.198-0.946
0.036
0.366
0.162-0.827
0.016
Medium expression
0.513
0.287-0.919
0.025
0.559
0.309-1.013
0.055
High expression
1.000
1.000
Sex
Males
1.580
0.916-2.724
0.100
Citation: Ntavatzikos A, Spathis A, Patapis P, Machairas N, Peros G, Konstantoudakis S, Leventakou D, Panayiotides IG, Karakitsos P, Koumarianou A. Integrating TYMS, KRAS and BRAF testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(32): 5913-5924