Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2017; 23(29): 5282-5294
Published online Aug 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i29.5282
Table 1 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification
Tumor status
StagePSTTumor stageOkuda StageLiver function studies
Stage A: early HCC
A10SingleINo portal hypertension
A20SingleIPortal hypertension and normal bilirubin
A30SingleIPortal hypertension and abnormal bilirubin
A403 tumors < 3 cmI-IIChild-Pugh A-B
Stage B: idermediate HCC0Large multinodularI-IIChild-Pugh A-B
Stage C: advanced HCC1-21Vascular invasion or extrahepatic spreadI-IIChild-Pugh A-B
Stage D: end-stage HCC3-42AnyIIIChild-Pugh C
Table 2 Child-Turcotte-Pugh score
MeasurementsScore
123
EncephalopathyNoneMildModerate
AscitesNoneSlightModerate
Serum Bilirubin (mg/dL)1-22-3> 3
Serum Albumin (mg/dL)> 3.52.8-3.5< 2.8
PT (seconds prolonged)< 44-6> 6
Table 3 Model for end-stage liver disease, United Network for Organ Sharing modification
MELD Score = 9.57 × ln (Serum Creatinine in mg/dL)
+ 3.78 × ln (Serum Bilirubin in mg/dL)
+ 11.2 × ln (INR) + 6.43
Table 4 American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging for Liver Tumors (7th edition, 2010)
Primary tumor (T)
TxPrimary tumor cannot be assessed
T0No evidence of primary tumor
T1Solitary tumor without vascular invasion
T2Solitary tumor with vascular invasion or multiple tumors, none more than 5 cm
T3aMultiple tumors more than 5 cm
T3bSingle tumor or multiple tumors of any size involving a major branch of the portal vein or the hepatic vein
T4Tumors with direct invasion of adjacent organs other than the gallbladder or with perforation of visceral peritoneum
Regional lymph nodes (N)
NxRegional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0No regional node metastasis
N1Regional lymph node metastasis
Distal Metastases (M)
M0No distant metastasis
M1Distant metastasis
Anatomic stage/prognostic groups
Stage IT1N0M0
Stage IIT2N0M0
Stage IIIAT3aN0M0
Stage IIIBT3bN0M0
Stage IIICT4N0M0
Stage IςAAny TN1M0
Stage IςBAny TAny NM1
Histologic grade (G)
G1Well differentiated
G2Moderately differentiated
G3Poorly differentiated
G4Undifferentiated
Fibrosis core (F)
The fibrosis score as defined by Ishak recommended because of its prognostic value in overall survival. This scoring system uses a 0-6 scale
F0Fibrosis score 0-4 (none to moderate fibrosis)
F1Fibrosis score 5-6 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis)
Table 5 Current treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma
Surgical
Resection
Resection + ablation
Orthotopic liver transplantation
Ablative
Thermal ablation (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation)
Percutaneous alcohol (ethanol) injection
Transarterial
Embolization
Chemoembolization
Radiotherapy
Transarterial and ablative (combined)
Systemic chemotherapy + radioembolization
Table 6 Treatment schedule proposed for hepatocellular carcinoma cirrhotic patients according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification system
StageTreatment intentionFirst/second choice
Stage A: early HCC
A1RadicalSurgical resection
A2Surgical resection ð OLT/percutaneous treatment
A3OLT/percutaneous treatment (Ablation)
A4OLT/percutaneous treatment (Ablation)
Stage B: intermediate HCCPalliative1Trasanterial embolization (associated or not to percutaneous treatment)
Chemoembolization (TACE)
Stage C: advanced HCCPalliative1New agents (Sorafenib)
Stage D: end-stage HCCSymptomaticSupporting treatment