Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2017; 23(15): 2723-2730
Published online Apr 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2723
Published online Apr 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2723
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients and therapeutic approaches (n = 83) n (%)
| Type II (n = 62) | Type III (n = 21) | P value | |
| Age (yr) | 0.72 | ||
| Median (range) | 68.5 (33-87) | 69 (54-80) | |
| Sex | 0.78 | ||
| Male | 49 (79) | 16 (76) | |
| Female | 13 (21) | 5 (24) | |
| Tumor size (mm) | 50 (10-168) | 70 (12-120) | 0.016 |
| Esophageal invasion (mm) | 9 (0-85) | 5 (0-15) | 0.024 |
| Total number of examined lymph nodes | 36.5 (5-96) | 51 (22-80) | 0.016 |
| Approach | |||
| Right thoracic | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | |
| Left thoracic | 8 (13) | 1 (5) | |
| Transhiatal | 46 (74) | 20 (95) | |
| Resection method | |||
| Subtotal esophagectomy | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | |
| Total gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy | 37 (60) | 21 (100) | |
| Proximal gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy | 17 (27) | 0 (0) | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.24 | ||
| Yes | 19 (31) | 9 (43) | |
| No | 43 (69) | 12 (57) |
Table 2 Pathological characteristics of patients (n = 83) n (%)
| Type II(n = 62) | Type III(n = 21) | P value | |
| T category | 0.06 | ||
| T1b | 11 (18) | 0 (0) | |
| T2 | 11 (18) | 2 (10) | |
| T3 | 40 (64) | 19 (90) | |
| N category | 0.41 | ||
| N0 | 21 (34) | 4 (19) | |
| N1 | 12 (19) | 6 (29) | |
| N2 | 13 (21) | 3 (14) | |
| N3 | 14 (23) | 6 (29) | |
| LNR | 0.063 (0-1) | 0.047 (0-0.41) | 0.74 |
| M category | 0.64 | ||
| M0 | 58 (94) | 19 (90) | |
| M1 | 4 (6) | 2 (10) | |
| TNM stage | 0.30 | ||
| IA | 10 (16) | 0 (0) | |
| IB | 5 (8) | 0 (0) | |
| IIA | 6 (10) | 4 (19) | |
| IIB | 5 (8) | 1 (5) | |
| IIIA | 8 (13) | 5 (24) | |
| IIIB | 11 (18) | 3 (14) | |
| IIIC | 12 (19) | 6 (29) | |
| IV | 5 (8) | 2 (10) | |
| ly category | 0.35 | ||
| ly0 | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | |
| ly1 | 16 (26) | 5 (24) | |
| ly2 | 22 (35) | 9 (43) | |
| ly3 | 16 (26) | 7 (33) | |
| v category | 0.55 | ||
| v0 | 7 (11) | 3 (14) | |
| v1 | 13 (21) | 4 (19) | |
| v2 | 24 (39) | 5 (24) | |
| v3 | 18 (29) | 9 (43) | |
| Histopathological grade | 0.56 | ||
| G1 + G2 | 37 (60) | 11 (52) | |
| G3 + G4 | 25 (40) | 10 (48) |
Table 3 Incidence, 5-year survival rate, and index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection
| Lymph node | Type II | Type III | Total | |||||
| station | Number of patients with dissection | Number of patients with metastasis | Number of patients with dissection | Number of patients with metastasis | Number of patients with dissection | Number of patients with metastasis | 5-yr survival rate | IEBLD |
| 1 | 62 | 27 | 21 | 11 | 83 | 38 | 49.70% | 22.8 |
| 2 | 62 | 14 | 21 | 5 | 83 | 19 | 50.70% | 11.6 |
| 3 | 62 | 27 | 21 | 14 | 83 | 41 | 53.70% | 26.5 |
| 4sa | 42 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 4sb | 43 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 62 | 2 | 100% | 3.2 |
| 4d | 39 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 59 | 0 | NA | 0.0 |
| 5 | 25 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 39 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | 31 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 52 | 0 | NA | 0.0 |
| 7 | 58 | 17 | 21 | 6 | 79 | 23 | 36.30% | 10.6 |
| 8 | 42 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 63 | 6 | 20.80% | 2.0 |
| 9 | 32 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 46 | 7 | 42.90% | 6.5 |
| 10 | 28 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 40 | 3 | 66.70% | 5.0 |
| 11p | 33 | 4 | 19 | 0 | 52 | 4 | 33.30% | 2.6 |
| 11d | 24 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 35 | 5 | 60% | 8.6 |
| 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | NA | 0.0 |
| 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | NA | 0.0 |
| LMLN | 13 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 20% | 6.3 |
| MMLN | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| UMLN | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
Table 4 Prognostic analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
| Category | Classification | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
| n | Proportion | 5 yr-OS | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
| Age (yr) | < 65 | 29 | 35% | 67% | 0.084 | 0.47 | ||
| ≥ 65 | 54 | 65% | 52% | |||||
| Sex | Male | 65 | 78% | 56% | 0.57 | |||
| Female | 18 | 22% | 67% | |||||
| Siewert type | II | 62 | 75% | 58% | 0.88 | |||
| III | 21 | 25% | 57% | |||||
| Esophageal invasion | ≤ 3 cm | 73 | 88% | 60% | 0.21 | |||
| > 3 cm | 10 | 12% | 40% | |||||
| Tumor size | < 6 cm | 45 | 54% | 58% | 0.86 | |||
| ≥ 6 cm | 38 | 46% | 58% | |||||
| pT | pT1-2 | 24 | 29% | 77% | 0.01a | 0.88 | ||
| pT3 | 59 | 71% | 50% | |||||
| pN | pN0 | 25 | 30% | 78% | 0.028a | 0.30 | ||
| pN1-3 | 58 | 70% | 49% | |||||
| Mediastinal LN meta | No | 78 | 94% | 60% | 0.007a | 0.17 | ||
| Yes | 5 | 6% | 20% | |||||
| LNR | < 0.16 | 59 | 71% | 71% | < 0.001a | 0.001a | ||
| > 0.16 | 24 | 29% | 23% | 4.29 | 1.79-10.89 | |||
| ly | ly0, 1 | 29 | 35% | 69% | 0.059 | 0.13 | ||
| ly2, 3 | 54 | 65% | 52% | |||||
| v | v0, 1 | 27 | 33% | 83% | < 0.001a | 0.004a | ||
| v2, 3 | 56 | 67% | 46% | 5.99 | 1.71-24.90 | |||
| Histopathological Grade | G1 + G2 | 48 | 58% | 60% | 0.28 | |||
| G3 + G4 | 35 | 42% | 55% | |||||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | No | 54 | 65% | 56% | 0.52 | |||
| Yes | 29 | 35% | 61% | |||||
| Residual tumor | R0 | 74 | 89% | 62% | < 0.001a | 0.056 | ||
| R1 | 9 | 11% | 22% | 2.61 | 0.97-6.59 | |||
- Citation: Hosoda K, Yamashita K, Moriya H, Mieno H, Watanabe M. Optimal treatment for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(15): 2723-2730
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i15/2723.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2723
