Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2016; 22(48): 10673-10679
Published online Dec 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10673
Published online Dec 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10673
Table 1 Eligibility and exclusion criteria for this study
Eligibility criteria | |
1 | Patients who required an EUS examination because of gastric diseases |
2 | Patients aged 18-70 yr |
Exclusion criteria | |
1 | Patients with contraindications to endoscopy |
2 | Patients allergic to the pharmaceutical ingredients |
3 | Patients with gastric bleeding or suspected gastric bleeding |
4 | Patients with blood coagulation dysfunction |
5 | Patients with severe psychological diseases such as depression, anxiety, hypochondria and hysteria |
6 | Patients with severe cardiac dysfunction (NYHA cardiac function classification ≥ class III) |
7 | Patients with abnormal hepatic function (serum ALT and AST levels of ≥ 4 times the upper normal limit) |
8 | Patients with renal dysfunction (serum Cr level of ≥ 2 times the upper normal limit) |
9 | Patients with moderate to severe ventilatory dysfunction |
10 | Diabetic patients with unsatisfactory glycemic control |
11 | Hypertensive patients with unsatisfactory blood pressure control |
12 | Pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding |
Table 2 Scoring of the gastric cavity obscurity grade
Score | Number of high-echo spots |
0 | No or few |
1 | Low |
2 | Moderate |
3 | High |
Table 3 Scoring of the gastric wall surface in endoscopic ultrasonography imaging
Score | Artifacts |
0 | Notable, affecting the diagnosis |
1 | Moderate |
2 | Negligible |
3 | None, clear wall interface |
Table 4 Demographic characteristics of enrolled patients
Pronase group | Placebo group | Value | P value | |
Number of patients | 63 | 62 | ||
Age, mean ± SD | 55.78 ± 12.37 | 53.47 ± 13.41 | t = 1.001 | 0.319 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 22 | 19 | χ2 = 0.259 | 0.611 |
Female | 41 | 43 | ||
Location | ||||
Fundus | 14 | 9 | χ2 = 1.264 | 0.532 |
Corpus | 26 | 29 | ||
Antrum | 23 | 24 | ||
Methods | ||||
Radial EUS | 48 | 43 | χ2 = 0.737 | 0.391 |
Linear-array EUS | 15 | 19 |
Table 5 Endoscopic ultrasonography obscurity scores for the gastric cavity and mucosal surface
Pronase group | Placebo group | Value | P value | |
Gastric cavity obscurity scores during EUS | ||||
3 | 14 | 8 | Z = -3.428 | 0.001 |
2 | 35 | 21 | ||
1 | 11 | 20 | ||
0 | 3 | 13 | ||
Gastric mucosal surface obscurity scores during EUS | ||||
3 | 11 | 7 | Z = -3.861 | 0.000 |
2 | 37 | 10 | ||
1 | 6 | 36 | ||
0 | 9 | 9 |
Table 6 Mean endoscopic ultrasonography obscurity scores for the gastric cavity and mucosal surface
Pronase group | Placebo group | Value | P value | |
Mean gastric cavity obscurity scores | 1.0476 ± 0.77 | 1.6129 ± 0.96 | t = -3.617 | 0.000 |
Mean gastric mucosal surface obscurity scores | 1.2063 ± 0.90 | 1.7581 ± 0.84 | t = -3.534 | 0.001 |
Duration of EUS, mean ± SD | 11.60 ± 3.32 | 13.13 ± 3.81 | t = -2.387 | 0.018 |
Volume of saline, mean ± SD | 417.94 ± 121.38 | 467.42 ± 104.52 | t = -2.441 | 0.016 |
- Citation: Wang GX, Liu X, Wang S, Ge N, Guo JT, Sun SY. Effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound of the stomach: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(48): 10673-10679
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i48/10673.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10673