Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2016; 22(48): 10502-10511
Published online Dec 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10502
Published online Dec 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10502
Table 1 Important clinical trials in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Ref. | Year published | Investigated drugs | Clinical outcome | |
OS | ORR | |||
Burris et al[39] | 1997 | Gemcitabine vs 5-FU | 5.65 mo vs 4.4 mo | 5.4% vs 0.0% |
Ueno et al[40] | 2005 | S-1 (quasi mesenchymal and oteracil) | 5.6 mo | 21.1% |
Moore et al[41] | 2007 | Gemcitabine vs erlotinib | 5.91 mo vs 6.24 mo | 8.0% vs 8.6% |
Conroy et al[42] | 2011 | Gemcitabine vs Oxaliplatin + irinotecan + leucoverin + 5-FU (FOLFIRINOX) | 6.80 mo vs 11.10 mo | 9.4% vs 31.6% |
Von Hoff et al[43] | 2013 | Gemcitabine vs gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel | 6.70 mo vs 8.50 mo | 7.0% vs 23.0 % |
Table 2 Important clinical trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Ref. | Year published | Investigated drugs | Number of patients | Clinical outcome | |
Median survival (mo) | 5-year survival (%) | ||||
Neoptolemos et al[19,52] (ESPAC 1) | 2001 and 2004 | 5-FU/FA vs No chemotherapy | 149/143 | 20.1/15.5 | 21.0/8.0 |
Oettle et al[53] | 2007 | Gemcitabine vs No chemotherapy | 179/175 | 22.1/20.2 | 22.5/11.5 |
Neoptolemos et al[20] (ESPAC 3) | 2010 | Gemcitabine vs 5-FU/FA | 539/551 | 23.6/23.0 | 17.5/15.9 |
Neoptolemos et al[20] (ESPAC 4) | 2016 | Gemcitabine vs Gemcitabine + Capecitabine | 366/364 | 25.5/28.0 | 16.3/28.8 |
Uesaka et al[55] | 2016 | Gemcitabine vs S1 | 193/192 | 24.5/46.5 | 24.4/44.1 |
- Citation: Buanes TA. Updated therapeutic outcome for patients with periampullary and pancreatic cancer related to recent translational research. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(48): 10502-10511
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i48/10502.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10502