Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2016; 22(3): 906-916
Published online Jan 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.906
Published online Jan 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.906
Study Design | Cancer type | Population | Therapy | Main Findings |
Prospective studies | ||||
Phase I pilot | Esophagus, gastric | Advanced disease | IMAB362 + ZA +/- IL-2 | Ongoing |
(NCT01671774) | Claudin 18.2 expression+ | |||
Phase I | Pancreas | n = 23 with resectable disease | ZA once pre-op, and twice post-op | Median/1 yr/2 yr OS: |
18 mo/86%/33% | ||||
Median/1 yr/2 yr PFS: | ||||
12 mo/27%/9% | ||||
No improvement | ||||
Phase II | HCC | Advanced disease | Sorafenib + ZA | Ongoing |
(NCT01259193) | ||||
Observational studies | ||||
Restricted open cohort study[15] | Colorectal | Region: Denmark 30505 postmenopausal female BP users matched 1:4 BP non-users | Alendronate | Alendronate associated with decreased incidence (HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.6-0.79), risk of death (HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.52-0.72) and longer survival (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.7-0.97, P < 0.05)1 |
Systematic review and meta-analysis[16] | Colorectal | Country: various | Alendronate, pamidronate, etidronate, ibandronate, risedronate, ZA | Significant decrease in cancer incidence (HR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.76-0.90) |
20001 cancer cases | ||||
392106 patients total | ||||
Case control[17] | Colorectal | Country: Israel | Any oral BP (95% alendronate) | BP use > 1 yr associated with significant decrease in cancer risk (RR = 0.5, 95%CI:I 0.35-0.71)2 |
Postmenopausal women | ||||
933 cancer cases matched 1:1 with controls without cancer | ||||
Case control[46] | Esophagus, gastric | Country: United Kingdom | Any BP except pamidronate and ibandronate | Esophagus cancer risk significantly higher in female BP users than non-users (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.18-1.72)3 |
8636 cancer cases matched 1:4 with controls without cancer | Higher risk with alendronate | |||
No difference in gastric cancer risk | ||||
Nested case control[47] | Esophagus, gastric, colorectal | Country: United Kingdom | Any oral BP | |
15613 cancer cases matched 1:5 with controls without cancer | Rx for BP associated with significant increase in risk of esophagus (RR = 1.3, 95%CI: 1.02-1.66, P = 0.02) but not gastric or colorectal cancer4 | |||
Matched cohort[48] | Esophagus, gastric | Country: Denmark | Highest risk: ≥ 10 Rx, ≥ 3 yr | |
History of fracture | Any oral BP | 85 cancer cases total | ||
13678 cases who filled BP Rx matched 1:2 with controls who did not fill BP Rx | (alendronate > etidronate > ibandronate, risedronate, clodronate) | BP use associated with significantly decreased risk of esophagus cancer (HR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.14-0.85, P = 0.02)5 No effect on gastric cancer risk | ||
Matched cohort[49] | Esophagus, gastric | Country: United Kingdom | Any oral BP | 207 cancer cases total |
41826 cases Rx BP matched 1:1 with controls not Rx BP | No increase in risk of esophagus or gastric cancer. Risk not affected by NBP vs non-NBP, duration of use, history of GERD6 | |||
Nested matched case control[50] | Esophagus | Country: United States | Etidronate, tiludronate, | < 2% of cases and controls filled Rx for BP |
History of Barrett’s esophagus | alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate | Non-significant association between BP | ||
116 with cancer matched 1:6 with controls without cancer | use and esophagus cancer risk (incidence density ratio 0.92, 95%CI: 0.21-4.15)7 | |||
Nested case control using 2 datasets[51] | Esophagus, gastric, colorectal | Country: United Kingdom 55952 cancer cases matched 1:5 with controls without cancer | Alendronate, etidronate, ibandronate, risedronate | BP use not associated with risk of esophagus or colorectal cancer Short but not long term alendronate associated with increased risk of gastric cancer (OR = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.34-2.72, P < 0.001) in one dataset8 |
Case control[52] | Esophagus | Country: Taiwan | Alendronate, risedronate, | No relationship between BP use and esophagus cancer risk |
16204 cancer cases matched 1:4 with controls without cancer | clodronate, etidronate | Inverse relationship between esophagus cancer risk and BP duration and frequency of use | ||
Meta-analysis observational data[53] | Esophagus | Country: various 3778 cancer cases 173612 BP users 483797 BP non-users | Ibandronate, etidronate, clodronate, zoledronate, pamidronate, alendronate | No association between BP use and esophagus cancer risk |
Cohort study[55] | Esophagus, gastric | Country: United States 1.64 million patients > 68 yr old with history of osteoporosis and/or BP use | Any oral BP | No association between BP use and esophagogastric cancer risk9 |
2308 cancer cases | ||||
624840 BP users | ||||
Meta-analysis of observational data[56] | Esophagus, gastric, colorectal | Country: various 16662 cancer cases | Any oral BP | No significant association between BP use and overall digestive cancer risk |
79379 controls without cancer | ||||
Meta-analysis of observational data[61] | Colorectal | Country: various 63363 cancer cases 200047 BP users | Any oral BP | No significant change or borderline significant decrease in risk of colorectal cancer |
1038526 BP non-users | ||||
Case series[70] | HCC | Country: Italy n = 15 patients with bone | ZA | Decreased pain score and analgesic requirements |
metastases, heavily pre-treated | Median OS 10 mo | |||
Retrospective cohort study[73] | HCC | Country: Japan n = 31 patients with bone metastases treated with radiation, 12 also received ZA | ZA | Significant decrease in 6-mo time to pain progression of radiated (0% vs 34%, P = 0.045) and non-irradiated (20% vs 66%, P = 0.005) bone metastases Significant decrease in 3-mo radiographic progression rate of non-irradiated bone metastases (29% vs 91%, P = 0.009) |
- Citation: Ang C, Doyle E, Branch A. Bisphosphonates as potential adjuvants for patients with cancers of the digestive system. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(3): 906-916
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i3/906.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.906