Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2016; 22(3): 1101-1113
Published online Jan 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1101
Published online Jan 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1101
EORTC QLQ-STO22 | FACT-Ga | DAUGS32 | |
Year introduced | 2001 | 2004 | 2005 |
Validated? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Parent questionnaire | EORTC QLQ-C30 | FACT-G | None |
Number of items/questions | 22 | 19 | 32 |
Focus | Patient symptoms | Emotional and physical symptoms | Gastrointestinal dysfunction |
Applicable to all treatment modalities? | Yes | Yes | No (surgery only) |
Author | Year | Main QoL outcome | QoL tool |
Korenaga et al[37] | 1992 | QoL - single time point | Interview, non-validated |
Davies et al[40] | 1998 | Comparison of extent of surgery (DG vs TG) | RSCL, Troidl, HAD, ADLs |
Spector et al[63] | 2002 | Comparison of approaches to GEJ tumors | GIQLI, LAGS |
Díaz De Liaño et al[68] | 2003 | Comparison of extent of resection and nodal dissection | QLQ-C30 |
Barbour et al[62] | 2008 | Comparison of approaches to GEJ tumors | QLQ-C30 |
Kim et al[71] | 2008 | Comparison of lap vs open for DG | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Tyrväinen et al[38] | 2008 | Long-term QoL | SF-36, 15D |
Avery et al[34] | 2010 | Longitudinal follow-up after TG and DG | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Lee et al[36] | 2010 | Long-term QoL | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Jeurnink et al[90] | 2010 | Surgical GJ vs stent for GOO | QLQ-C30, EuroQoL-5D, EuroQoL-VAS, QLQ-PAN26 |
Kobayashi et al[42] | 2011 | Comparison of extent (DG vs TG)and method (lap vs open) of surgery | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Kim et al[35] | 2012 | Longitudinal follow-up after TG and DG | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Kulig et al[85] | 2012 | QoL in non-curative resection | QLQ-C30 |
Lee et al[48] | 2012 | Comparison of reconstruction after DG (BI vs BII vs R-Y) | GIQLI |
Munene et al[11] | 2012 | Longitudinal follow-up, comparison of extent of surgery (DG vs TG) | FACT-Ga |
Takiguchi et al[49] | 2012 | Comparison of reconstruction after DG (BI vs R-Y) | QLQ-C30, DAUGS 20 |
Karanicolas et al[33] | 2013 | Comparison of extent of surgery (DG vs TG vs PG) | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Rausei et al[43] | 2013 | Comparison of extent of surgery (DG vs TG) | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Park et al[44] | 2014 | Comparison of extent of surgery (DG vs TG) | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Takiguchi et al[29] | 2014 | TG vs PG for proximal gastric tumors | PGSAS-45 |
Worster et al[99] | 2014 | Longitudinal study, prophylactic gastrectomy patients | QLQ-C30, QLQ-STO22 |
Ronellenfitsch et al[57] | 2015 | Longitudinal follow-up after PG | FACT-E |
Type of surgical therapy | Quality of life summary |
Resection for cure | DG leads to better QoL |
TG is superior to PG for proximal cancers | |
For GEJ tumors, abdominal procedures are associated with better QoL | |
Laparoscopy is likely associated with quicker attainment of post-operative QoL | |
Goal is return to baseline QoL | |
Palliative resection | Non surgical (less invasive) procedures are desirable |
Surgical resection only in highly selected individuals - excellent performance status and life expectancy | |
Goal is to improve QoL | |
Prophylactic gastrectomy | Total gastrectomy is essential |
Similar post-operative reduction in QoL as for confirmed malignancy | |
Goal is return to pre-operative baseline | |
Further studies required |
- Citation: McCall MD, Graham PJ, Bathe OF. Quality of life: A critical outcome for all surgical treatments of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(3): 1101-1113
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i3/1101.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1101