Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2016; 22(29): 6690-6705
Published online Aug 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6690
Published online Aug 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6690
Table 1 Calibration data of the chromatographic methods
| Cholesterol | Hypericin | ||||
| Conc. | PA ± SD | RT ± SD (min) | Conc. | PA ± SD | RT ± SD (min) |
| (×10-3 M) | (n = 4) | (×10-6 M) | (n = 4) | ||
| 2.6 | 32715275 ± 532288 | 19.60 ± 0.19 | 0.6 | 961398 ± 14312 | 9.85 ± 0.14 |
| 5.2 | 64995700 ± 622439 | 19.83 ± 0.26 | 1.3 | 3120453 ± 33528 | 9.63 ± 0.03 |
| 7.8 | 91376450 ± 1113357 | 19.79 ± 0.14 | 2.5 | 5782945 ± 90738 | 9.41 ± 0.13 |
| 10.3 | 124007250 ± 2116420 | 19.97± 0.11 | 5.0 | 10563681 ± 134692 | 9.75 ± 0.11 |
| 12.9 | 151245250 ± 2660042 | 20.03 ± 0.12 | 10.0 | 20814150 ± 226368 | 9.61 ± 0.07 |
Table 2 System suitability
| System suitability parameters | Cholesterol | Hypericin |
| Theoretical plates (N) | 7700 | 5500 |
| Asymmetry factor (As) | 1.02 | 0.75 |
| Tailing factor (TF) | 1.00 | 0.61 |
Table 3 Results of the intra-day precision studies
| Cholesterol | Hypericin | ||||
| Conc. | RSD-PA | RSD-RT | Conc. | RSD-PA | RSD-RT |
| (×10-3 M) | (×10-6 M) | ||||
| 2.6 | 1.6% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| 5.2 | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.3% |
| 7.8 | 1.2% | 0.7% | 2.5% | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| 10.3 | 1.7% | 0.5% | 5.0% | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| 12.9 | 1.7% | 0.6% | 10.0% | 1.1% | 0.7% |
Table 4 Results of the recovery studies
| Compound | Labelled amount | Added amount | Found amount | Recovery | RSD |
| Cholesterol | 1.0 mg | 0.80 mg | 0.79 mg | 99.8% | 1.6% |
| 1.00 mg | 1.00 mg | 100.0% | 1.1% | ||
| 1.20 mg | 1.19 mg | 99.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Hypericin | 0.0025 μg | 0.0020 μg | 0.0029 μg | 108.8% | 0.4% |
| 0.0025 μg | 0.0026 μg | 101.7% | 0.1% | ||
| 0.0030 μg | 0.0032 μg | 103.6% | 1.6% |
Table 5 Linearity of the high performance liquid chromatography methods for cholesterol and hypericin
| Compound | LR | Slope | SD (LR) | R2 | LOD (M) | LOQ (M) |
| Cholesterol | y = 1 × 107 x + 3 × 106 | 11712479 | 2055881 | 0.998 | 0.58 × 10-3 | 1.76 × 10-3 |
| Hypericin | y = 2 × 106x + 2 × 105 | 2066297 | 433480 | 0.998 | 0.69 × 10-6 | 2.1 × 10-6 |
Table 6 Results of the analysis of cholesterol, mixed and pigment stones
| Type of stones | Cholesterol | Hypericin | P value | |
| Conc. (× 10-3 M) | Percentage | Conc. (× 10-6 M) | ||
| IPA/DMSO extracts | in stone | IPA/DMSO extracts | ||
| Cholesterol | 7.68 ± 0.25 | 83%-86% | 2.01 ± 0.38 | |
| Mixed | 6.65 ± 0.12 | 71%-75% | 0.50 ± 0.19 | 0.011 |
| Pigment | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 1%-3% | 0.23 ± 0.06 | |
- Citation: Miranda Cona M, Liu YW, Hubert A, Yin T, Feng YB, de Witte P, Waelkens E, Jiang YS, Zhang J, Mulier S, Xia Q, Huang G, Oyen R, Ni YC. Differential diagnosis of gallstones by using hypericin as a fluorescent optical imaging agent. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(29): 6690-6705
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i29/6690.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6690
