Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2016; 22(2): 600-617
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.600
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.600
Table 1 Types and characteristics of various duodenal lesions that can be encountered on upper endoscopy
| Type of duodenal lesion | Duodenal wall layer | Malignant potential | Requires resection | Amenable to endoscopic resection |
| Lipoma | Subepithelial | No | No | Possible |
| Gastrointestinal stromal tumors | Subepithelial | Yes | Yes | Possible |
| (for small lesions); often requires surgery | ||||
| Carcinoids | Subepithelial | Yes | Yes | Possible |
| (for rare, isolated lesions); often requires surgery | ||||
| Brunner’s gland “adenomas” or hamartomas | Mucosal | No | If patients are symptomatic | Yes |
| Solitary Peutz-Jeghers polyps | Mucosal | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Adenoma | Mucosal | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Table 2 Endoscopic procedures for the potential resection of elevated or sessile mucosally-based duodenal lesions (typically for duodenal adenomas)
| Procedure | Appropriate lesion size | Used for non-ampullary lesions | Used for papillectomy | Piecemeal resection possible | Can be done using a duodenoscope | Degree of difficulty |
| Snare polypectomy (en bloc) | ≤ 10 mm | Y | Y | N | Y | + |
| Cap-assisted EMR | ≤ 18 mm | Y | N | Y | N | +++ |
| (requires submucosal lifting) | ||||||
| Cap-band-assisted EMR | ≤ 11 mm | Y | N | Y | N | ++ |
| Conventional EMR (with submucosal injection) | Any size | Y | Y | Y | Y | +++ |
| Underwater EMR | Any size | Y | Y | Y | Y | +++ |
| (forward-viewing scope with a cap is preferred) | ||||||
| ESD | Any size | Y | N | N/A | N | ++++ |
| (goal of ESD is en bloc resection) |
- Citation: Gaspar JP, Stelow EB, Wang AY. Approach to the endoscopic resection of duodenal lesions. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(2): 600-617
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i2/600.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.600
