Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2016; 22(19): 4638-4650
Published online May 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4638
Published online May 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4638
Author and trial | Line of treatment | Phase of study | n | Treatment arms | Outcomes |
Anti-HGF/cMET antibodies | |||||
Cunningham et al[63], RILOMET-1 (2015) | First | III | 609 | ECX + rilotumumab vs ECX + placebo | OS: 9.6 mo vs 11.5 mo (HR = 1.37, P = 0.016) |
PFS: 5.7 mo vs 5.7 mo (HR = 1.30, P = 0.016) | |||||
ORR: 30% vs 39.2% (OR 0.67, P = 0.027) | |||||
Shah et al[65], METGastric (2015) | First | III | 562 | mFOLFOX + ornatuzumab vs mFOLFOX + placebo | OS: 11.0 mo vs 11.3 mo (HR = 0.82, P = 0.244) |
PFS: 6.7 mo vs 6.8 mo (HR = 0.90, P = 0.429) | |||||
ORR: 46% vs 41% (P = 0.253) | |||||
Malka et al[66], PRODIGE 17 ACCORD 20 MEGA (2015) | First | II | 162 | mFOLFOX alone vs mFOLFOX + panitumumab vs mFOLFOX + rilobumumab | 4-mo PFS rate: 71 vs 63 vs 63% |
PFS: 5.8 mo vs 5.2 mo vs 7.6 mo | |||||
ORR: 54% vs 44% vs 50% | |||||
Akt/mTOR inhibitors | |||||
Hudis et al[68] (2013) | Second/third | I | 34 | Trastuzumab + Akt inhibitor (MK-2206) | RR (including stable disease): 24% |
Time to progression: 72 d | |||||
Ohtsu et al[70] GRANITE (2013) | Second/third | III | 646 | Everolimus vs BSC | OS: 5.4 mo vs 4.3 mo (HR = 0.90, P = 0.124) |
PFS: 1.7 mo vs 1.4 mo (HR = 0.66, P < 0.001) | |||||
ORR: 4.5% vs 2.1%; DCR: 43.3% vs 22.0% | |||||
Shen et al[71] (2014) | First | II | 40 | Everolimus + cisplatin + HDFL | OS: 10.5 mo (95%CI: 8.6-12.3) |
PFS: 6.9 mo (95%CI: 4.9-8.4) | |||||
STAT3 inhibitor | |||||
Oh et al[74] (2015) | Second/third | I | 25 | STAT3 inhibitor (OPB-31121) | RR (including stable disease): 44.4% |
Immune checkpoints inhibitors | |||||
Ralph et al[89] (2010) | Second | II | 18 | Tremelimumab | OS: 4.8 mo (95%CI: 4.06-5.59) |
12 mo OS rate: 33% (95%CI: 14-54) | |||||
RR (including stable disease): 27.8% | |||||
Bang et al[90], KEYNOTE-012 (2015) | Second/third | I | 39 | Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) | OS: 11.4 mo; PFS 1.9 mo |
ORR: 22% (95%CI: 10-39) | |||||
Yamada et al[93] (2015) | Second/third | I | 20 | Avelumab (MS0010718C) | PFS: 11.9 wk (95%CI: 6.0-12.3) |
ORR: 15.0% (95%CI: 3.2-37.9) | |||||
Multikinase inhibitors | |||||
Sun et al[95] (2010) | First | II | 44 | Sorafenib + docetaxel + cisplatin | OS: 13.6 mo (90%CI: 8.6-16.1) |
PFS: 5.8 mo (90%CI: 5.4-7.4) | |||||
PR: 41% (90%CI: 28-54) | |||||
Martin-Richard et al[96], GERCAD (2013) | First | II | 40 | Sorafenib + oxaliplatin | OS: 6.5 mo (95%CI: 5.2-9.6) |
PFS: 3 mo (95%CI: 2.3-4.1) | |||||
RR (including stable disease): 50.0% | |||||
Hecht et al[100], LOGiC (2015) | First | III | 487 | CapeOx + lapatinib vs CapeOx + placebo | OS: 12.2 mo vs 10.5 mo (HR = 0.91, P = 0.349) |
PFS: 6.0 mo vs 5.4 mo (HR = 0.82, P = 0.0381) | |||||
ORR: 53% vs 39% (P = 0.0031) | |||||
Satoh et al[101], TyTAN (2014) | Second | III | 261 | Lapatinib + paclitaxel vs Paclitaxel alone | OS: 11.0 mo vs 8.9 mo (HR = 0.84, P = 0.1044) |
PFS: 5.4 mo vs 4.4 mo (HR = 0.85, P = 0.2441) | |||||
ORR: 27% vs 9% (P < 0.001) | |||||
Pavlakis et al[103], INTEGRATE (2015) | Second/third | II | 147 | Regorafenib vs placebo | OS: 5.8 mo vs 4.5 mo (HR = 0.74, P = 0.11) |
PFS: 2.6 mo vs 0.9 mo (HR = 0.40, P < 0.0001) | |||||
RR (including stable disease): 44% vs 16% | |||||
Lee et al[106] (2015) | First | II | 66 | CapeOx + pazopanib | PFS: 6.5 mo; OS: 10.5 mo; ORR: 57.6% |
Trial identifier | Line of treatment | Phase of study | Treatment arms | Primary endpoint |
Akt/mTOR inhibitors | ||||
NCT01613950[32] | Second/third | Ib | AUY922/BYL719 | MTD |
Immune checkpoints inhibitors | ||||
NCT02335411 (KEYNOTE-059)[91] | Third | II | Cohort 1: pembrolizumab monotherapy | ORR |
Cohort 2: pembrolizumab + 5-FU/cisplatin or capecitabine/cisplatin | ||||
NCT02370498 (KEYNOTE-061)[92] | Second | III | Pembrolizumab vs paclitaxel | PFS, OS |
Multikinase inhibitors | ||||
NCT02015169[107] | Neoadjuvant | II | XELOX + lapatinib | R0 resection rate |
NCT01913639[108] | First | II | FOLFOX + regorafenib | PFS |
- Citation: Joo MK, Park JJ, Chun HJ. Recent updates of precision therapy for gastric cancer: Towards optimal tailored management. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(19): 4638-4650
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i19/4638.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4638