Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2016; 22(19): 4638-4650
Published online May 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4638
Table 1 Clinical outcomes of recent trials of targeted therapy in advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma
Author and trialLine of treatmentPhase of studynTreatment armsOutcomes
Anti-HGF/cMET antibodies
Cunningham et al[63], RILOMET-1 (2015)FirstIII609ECX + rilotumumab vs ECX + placeboOS: 9.6 mo vs 11.5 mo (HR = 1.37, P = 0.016)
PFS: 5.7 mo vs 5.7 mo (HR = 1.30, P = 0.016)
ORR: 30% vs 39.2% (OR 0.67, P = 0.027)
Shah et al[65], METGastric (2015)FirstIII562mFOLFOX + ornatuzumab vs mFOLFOX + placeboOS: 11.0 mo vs 11.3 mo (HR = 0.82, P = 0.244)
PFS: 6.7 mo vs 6.8 mo (HR = 0.90, P = 0.429)
ORR: 46% vs 41% (P = 0.253)
Malka et al[66], PRODIGE 17 ACCORD 20 MEGA (2015)FirstII162mFOLFOX alone vs mFOLFOX + panitumumab vs mFOLFOX + rilobumumab4-mo PFS rate: 71 vs 63 vs 63%
PFS: 5.8 mo vs 5.2 mo vs 7.6 mo
ORR: 54% vs 44% vs 50%
Akt/mTOR inhibitors
Hudis et al[68] (2013)Second/thirdI34Trastuzumab + Akt inhibitor (MK-2206)RR (including stable disease): 24%
Time to progression: 72 d
Ohtsu et al[70] GRANITE (2013)Second/thirdIII646Everolimus vs BSCOS: 5.4 mo vs 4.3 mo (HR = 0.90, P = 0.124)
PFS: 1.7 mo vs 1.4 mo (HR = 0.66, P < 0.001)
ORR: 4.5% vs 2.1%; DCR: 43.3% vs 22.0%
Shen et al[71] (2014)FirstII40Everolimus + cisplatin + HDFLOS: 10.5 mo (95%CI: 8.6-12.3)
PFS: 6.9 mo (95%CI: 4.9-8.4)
STAT3 inhibitor
Oh et al[74] (2015)Second/thirdI25STAT3 inhibitor (OPB-31121)RR (including stable disease): 44.4%
Immune checkpoints inhibitors
Ralph et al[89] (2010)SecondII18TremelimumabOS: 4.8 mo (95%CI: 4.06-5.59)
12 mo OS rate: 33% (95%CI: 14-54)
RR (including stable disease): 27.8%
Bang et al[90], KEYNOTE-012 (2015)Second/thirdI39Pembrolizumab (MK-3475)OS: 11.4 mo; PFS 1.9 mo
ORR: 22% (95%CI: 10-39)
Yamada et al[93] (2015)Second/thirdI20Avelumab (MS0010718C)PFS: 11.9 wk (95%CI: 6.0-12.3)
ORR: 15.0% (95%CI: 3.2-37.9)
Multikinase inhibitors
Sun et al[95] (2010)FirstII44Sorafenib + docetaxel + cisplatinOS: 13.6 mo (90%CI: 8.6-16.1)
PFS: 5.8 mo (90%CI: 5.4-7.4)
PR: 41% (90%CI: 28-54)
Martin-Richard et al[96], GERCAD (2013)FirstII40Sorafenib + oxaliplatinOS: 6.5 mo (95%CI: 5.2-9.6)
PFS: 3 mo (95%CI: 2.3-4.1)
RR (including stable disease): 50.0%
Hecht et al[100], LOGiC (2015)FirstIII487CapeOx + lapatinib vs CapeOx + placeboOS: 12.2 mo vs 10.5 mo (HR = 0.91, P = 0.349)
PFS: 6.0 mo vs 5.4 mo (HR = 0.82, P = 0.0381)
ORR: 53% vs 39% (P = 0.0031)
Satoh et al[101], TyTAN (2014)SecondIII261Lapatinib + paclitaxel vs Paclitaxel aloneOS: 11.0 mo vs 8.9 mo (HR = 0.84, P = 0.1044)
PFS: 5.4 mo vs 4.4 mo (HR = 0.85, P = 0.2441)
ORR: 27% vs 9% (P < 0.001)
Pavlakis et al[103], INTEGRATE (2015)Second/thirdII147Regorafenib vs placeboOS: 5.8 mo vs 4.5 mo (HR = 0.74, P = 0.11)
PFS: 2.6 mo vs 0.9 mo (HR = 0.40, P < 0.0001)
RR (including stable disease): 44% vs 16%
Lee et al[106] (2015)FirstII66CapeOx + pazopanibPFS: 6.5 mo; OS: 10.5 mo; ORR: 57.6%
Table 2 Ongoing clinical trials of target therapy in advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma
Trial identifierLine of treatmentPhase of studyTreatment armsPrimary endpoint
Akt/mTOR inhibitors
NCT01613950[32]Second/thirdIbAUY922/BYL719MTD
Immune checkpoints inhibitors
NCT02335411 (KEYNOTE-059)[91]ThirdIICohort 1: pembrolizumab monotherapyORR
Cohort 2: pembrolizumab + 5-FU/cisplatin or capecitabine/cisplatin
NCT02370498 (KEYNOTE-061)[92]SecondIIIPembrolizumab vs paclitaxelPFS, OS
Multikinase inhibitors
NCT02015169[107]NeoadjuvantIIXELOX + lapatinibR0 resection rate
NCT01913639[108]FirstIIFOLFOX + regorafenibPFS