Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2016; 22(18): 4559-4566
Published online May 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4559
Published online May 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4559
Table 1 Characteristics and outcomes of left ventricular assist device recipients undergoing video capsule endoscopy n (%)
Total, n = 30 | Positive study, n = 12 | Negative study, n = 18 | P value | |
Age (yr) | 60.1 ± 10.2 | 62.6 ± 8.8 | 58.4 ± 10.9 | 0.27 |
Female | 6 (20.0) | 4 (33.3) | 2 (11.1) | 0.18 |
Charlson comorbidity index | 4.7 | 5 | 4.6 | 0.70 |
History of GIB prior to LVAD | 3 (10.0) | 2 (16.7) | 1 (5.6) | 0.55 |
LVAD implant to GIB (mo) | 4.8 ± 6.0 | 5.5 ± 7.0 | 4.4 ± 5.3 | 0.65 |
Overt GIB | 23 (76.7) | 8 (66.7) | 15 (83.3) | 0.39 |
Antiplatelet agents | 26 (86.7) | 10 (83.3) | 16 (88.9) | 1.00 |
Anticoagulants | 28 (93.3) | 11 (91.7) | 17 (94.4) | 1.00 |
Endoscopies prior to VCE (number) | 3.2 ± 1.7 | 3.5 ± 1.9 | 3.0 ± 1.7 | 0.46 |
Length of stay (d) | 13.1 ± 12.5 | 20.3 ± 17.6 | 8.3 ± 2.3 | 0.04 |
Follow-up (mo) | 11.6 ± 9.6 | 9.2 ± 9.3 | 13.2 ± 9.7 | 0.28 |
Recurrent GIB rate | 16 (53.3) | 6 (50) | 10 (55.6) | 1.00 |
Endoscopies after VCE (number) | 1.7 ± 2.2 | 1.8 ± 1.8 | 1.7 ± 2.5 | 0.97 |
Mortality rate | 10 (33.3) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (33.3) | 0.90 |
Table 2 Locations and findings of positive video capsule endoscopy studies n (%)
Patients (n = 12) | |
Locations of positive VCE findings | |
Stomach and duodenum | 2 (16.7) |
Small intestine | 9 (75.0) |
Colon | 1 (8.3) |
Findings of positive VCE studies | |
Small intestinal bleeding with no source or lesion identified (2 in the duodenum, 4 in the jejunum) | 6 (50.0) |
Angiodysplasia (1 in the duodenum, 3 in the small bowel) | 4 (33.3) |
Colonic bleeding with no source or lesion identified | 1 (8.3) |
Gastric ulcer | 1 (8.3) |
Table 3 Clinical course and management of left ventricular assist device recipients with positive video capsule endoscopy studies
No. | Age (yr) and Sex | Presentation | Endoscopic findings and interval prior to VCE (d) | VCE findings | Endoscopic findings and interval after VCE (d) | Recurrent bleeding and interval after VCE (mo) | Management for recurrent bleeding |
1 | 62 M | Anemia | Rectal polyp (2) | Gastric ulcer | N/A | Melena (21) | EGD: GU with visible vessel s/p hemoclip |
2 | 57 M | Anemia | Gastritis, colonic polyp (24) | Duodenal angiodysplasia | PE: Gastritis (2) | No | N/A |
3 | 73 M | Melena | Gastric and jejunal angiodysplasia (4) | Small bowel angiodysplasia | N/A | Melena (1.7) | PE: Bleeding jejunal angiodysplasia s/p APC |
4 | 53 F | Melena | Blood in the terminal ileum (0) | Small bowel angiodysplasia | PE: Bleeding jejunal angiodysplasia s/p APC + hemoclip (2) | No | N/A |
5 | 61 M | Anemia | Colonic diverticulosis, hemorrhoids (3) | Small bowel angiodysplasia | N/A | No | N/A |
6 | 53 M | Anemia | Duodenitis (4) | Stomach and small bowel bleeding | PE: Clean base GU (2) | Melena (0.5) | PE: Gastritis and fresh blood in duodenum without lesions identified |
7 | 70 F | Melena | Gastric angiodysplasia s/p APC (3) | Small bowel bleeding | N/A | Melena (11.4) | PE: DLBCL of stomach |
8 | 61 F | Hematochezia | Sigmoid angiodysplasia s/p APC (2) | Small bowel bleeding | PE: Normal; SBE: Bleeding jejunal angiodysplasia s/p APC+ hemoclip (2) | Hematochezia (11.2) | PE: Gastritis; C-scope: Bleeding sigmoid angiodysplasia s/p APC + hemoclip |
9 | 52 M | Melena | Colonic diverticulosis, hemorrhoids (1) | Small bowel bleeding | N/A | No | N/A |
10 | 59 M | Melena | Duodenal angiodysplasia s/p APC and hemoclip (5) | Small bowel bleeding | PE: Bleeding jejunal angiodysplasia s/p heater probe + APC; SBE: Nonbleeding jejunal angiodysplasia s/p APC (6) | Anemia requiring transfusion (0.7) | C-scope: Bleeding Cecal angiodysplasia s/p hemoclip |
11 | 75 M | Melena | Colonic angiodysplasia s/p hemoclip (6) | Small bowel bleeding | PE: Gastric Dieulafoy’s lesion s/p hemoclip; SBE: Bleeding jejunal angiodysplasia s/p APC + hemoclip (2) | No | N/A |
12 | 76 F | Melena | Normal (4) | Colonic bleeding | N/A | No | N/A |
Table 4 Previous studies of video capsule endoscopy in left ventricular assist device recipients
Study and the year published | No. of VCE | Diagnostic yield (%) | Findings | Remarks |
Girelli et al[18], 2006 | 1 | N/A | No bleeding identified | No follow up reported |
Garatti et al[15], 2006 | 1 | N/A | No bleeding identified | No recurrent GIB; received heart transplantation |
Seow et al[17], 2006 | 1 | N/A | Duodenal and jejunal angiodysplasia | Push enteroscopy + Octreotide + Sucralfate; no follow up reported |
Fenkel et al[16], 2007 | 1 | N/A | Small bowel angiodysplasia | No intervention; no follow up reported |
Daas et al[14], 2008 | 1 | N/A | Mid-small bowel active bleeding | Intraoperative enteroscopy;no follow up reported |
Bechtel et al[19], 2010 | 1 | N/A | Bleeding in cecum | Colonoscopy; no follow up reported |
Elmunzer et al[6], 2011 | 13 | 4 (30.8) | 3 jejunal angiodysplasias, 1 duodenal Dieulafoy’s lesion | 1 recurrent bleeding from the same lesion |
Meyer et al[22], 2012 | 5 | 4 (80.0) | 2 jejunal angiodysplasia, 1 cecal ulcer, 1 jejunal mass | 1 colonoscopy; 2 SBE; 1 angiography; no follow up reported |
Tarzia et al[13], 2013 | 1 | N/A | Small bowel angiodysplasia and small bowel Dieulafoy’s lesion | DBE; no follow up reported |
- Citation: Amornsawadwattana S, Nassif M, Raymer D, LaRue S, Chen CH. Video capsule endoscopy in left ventricular assist device recipients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(18): 4559-4566
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i18/4559.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4559