Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2016; 22(14): 3793-3802
Published online Apr 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i14.3793
Table 1 Characteristics of 419 patients who underwent endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage via plastic stent and nasobiliary catheter n (%)
All patients (n = 419)PS (n = 253)NBC (n = 166)P value
Sex, male269 (64)163 (64)106 (64)0.905
Age (yr)69 (63-75)69 (62-75)70 (63-76)0.274
Performance status, 0/1/2331/81/7 (79/19/2)201/50/2 (79/20/1)130/31/5 (78/19/3)0.781
Primary cancer, pancreas/biliary tract/ampullary194/175/50 (46/42/12)133/91/29 (53/36/11)61/84/21 (37/51/13)0.003
Primary tumor size (mm)20 (15-30)20 (14-28)22 (18-30)0.008
Length of biliary stricture (mm)16 (11-22)15 (11-22)17 (12-23)0.154
Diameter of proximal bile duct (mm)15 (12-18)15 (12-18)14 (11-17)0.050
Involvement of intrapancreatic bile duct354 (84)221 (87)133 (80)0.048
Tumor invasion into duodenum213 (51)1132 (53)81 (51)0.823
Cholangitis on admission64 (15)34 (13)30 (18)0.200
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)7.8 (3.3-13.2)7.5 (3.3-12.6)8.6 (3.4-13.5)0.536
Table 2 Procedures, adverse events, and causes of dysfunction in patients who underwent preoperative plastic stent and nasobiliary catheter placement n (%)
All patients (n = 419)PS (n = 253)NBC (n = 166)P value
Procedures of the initial ERCP
EST or EPBD178 (43)101 (40)77 (46)0.202
Biopsy or brushing of the bile duct362 (86)214 (85)148 (89)0.234
Positive for cancer250 (60)150 (59)100 (60)
Biliary stents/catheters placed
Diameter 5-6/7-7.5/8.5-10 Fr98/236/85 (23/56/20)18/150/85 (7/59/34)80/86/0 (48/52/0)< 0.001
Pig-tailed tip/straight tip152/224174/177 (29/71)78/47 (62/38)< 0.001
Placement of pancreatic stent41 (10)25 (10)16 (10)0.935
Adverse events (other than cholangitis)
Pancreatitis40 (10)26 (10)14 (8)0.612
Mild/moderate/severe30/10/0
Cholecystitis4 (1)2 (1)2 (1)0.650
Others4 (1)2 (1)2 (1)0.650
Stent/catheter dysfunction118 (36)88 (35)30 (18)< 0.001
Causes of PS/NBC dysfunction
Occlusion or cholangitis8569 (27)16 (10)0.013
Insufficient drainage1914 (6)5 (3)0.330
Migration105 (2)5 (3)0.526
Inadvertent removal4NA4 (2)NA
Number of ERCPs2 (1-2)1 (1-1)2 (1-2)< 0.0001
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate competing risks regression analyses to identify risk factors for dysfunction of plastic stent or nasobiliary catheter in 419 patients who underwent endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
SHR (95%CI)P valueSHR (95%CI)P value
Sex, male0.96 (0.64-1.44)0.839
Age > 70 yr1.06 (0.72-1.56)0.773
Performance status ≥ 10.67 (0.39-1.14)0.1390.70 (0.39-1.24)0.221
Primary cancer
Biliary tractReferenceReference
Pancreas1.61 (1.06-2.44)0.0251.30 (0.84-2.03)0.240
Ampullary0.89 (0.43-1.84)0.7580.81 (0.40-1.65)0.568
Primary tumor size > 20 mm0.90 (0.61-1.33)0.603
Length of biliary stricture > 20 mm1.04 (0.71-1.53)0.854
Diameter of proximal bile duct > 15 mm0.94 (0.64-1.38)0.755
Tumor invasion into duodenum1.10 (0.75-1.63)0.621
Cholangitis on admission0.77 (0.44-1.37)0.378
Total bilirubin ≥ 8 mg/dL1.16 (0.79-1.71)0.447
Placement of PS4.76 (2.63-8.33)< 0.0014.76 (2.44-10.0)< 0.001
Diameter of biliary stent/catheter
5-6 FrReferenceReference
7-7.5 Fr1.92 (1.07-3.43)0.0290.95 (0.50-1.83)0.885
8.5-10 Fr2.44 (1.28-4.66)0.0070.93 (0.44-1.99)0.850
Pig-tailed tip1.05 (0.71-1.57)0.796
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate competing risk regression analyses to identify risk factors for plastic stent dysfunction in 253 patients who underwent endoscopic preoperative plastic stent placement
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
SHR (95%CI)P valueSHR (95%CI)P value
Sex, male1.00 (0.65-1.55)0.993
Age > 70 yr1.15 (0.76-1.74)0.509
Performance status ≥ 10.84 (0.49-1.45)0.534
Primary cancer
Biliary tractReference
Pancreas1.27 (0.81-1.99)0.303
Ampullary0.83 (0.39-1.79)0.637
Primary tumor size > 20 mm1.10 (0.72-1.69)0.657
Length of biliary stricture > 20 mm1.01 (0.66-1.54)0.957
Diameter of proximal bile duct > 15 mm0.85 (0.56-1.28)0.432
Tumor invasion into duodenum1.10 (0.72-1.67)0.659
Cholangitis on admission0.79 (0.41-1.52)0.479
Total bilirubin ≥ 8 mg/dL1.32 (0.87-2.00)0.1921.43 (0.94-2.18)0.096
Diameter of biliary stent/catheter
5-6 FrReference
7-7.5 Fr0.76 (0.37-1.56)0.446
8.5-10 Fr0.67 (0.31-1.46)0.314
Pig-tailed tip1.73 (1.14-2.63)0.0101.72 (1.13-2.64)0.012
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate competing risks regression analyses to identify prognostic factors for jaundice resolution after endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage in 325 patients
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
SHR (95%CI)P valueSHR (95%CI)P value
Sex, male0.90 (0.71-1.14)0.387
Age ≥ 69 yr1.01 (0.80-1.27)0.932
Performance status ≥ 11.00 (0.73-1.39)0.979
Primary cancer
Biliary tractReference
Pancreas1.07 (0.84-1.36)0.602
Ampullary1.19 (0.80-1.77)0.389
Primary tumor size > 20 mm0.81 (0.63-1.04)0.0940.91 (0.69-1.20)0.524
Length of biliary stricture > 20 mm0.80 (0.63-1.01)0.0590.82 (0.63-1.06)0.134
Diameter of proximal bile duct > 15 mm0.78 (0.62-0.98)0.0330.81 (0.63-1.05)0.107
Tumor invasion to duodenum0.96 (0.76-1.21)0.721
Cholangitis on admission1.11 (0.80-1.54)0.528
Total bilirubin ≥ 8 mg/dL0.41 (0.31-0.55)< 0.0010.43 (0.32-0.58)< 0.001
EST or EPBD1.02 (0.81-1.28)0.897
Diameter of biliary stent/catheter
5-6 FrReference
7-7.5 Fr0.96 (0.73-1.25)0.738
8.5-10 Fr0.97 (0.70-1.34)0.859
Pig-tailed tip1.05 (0.83-1.34)0.681
Placement of NBC0.83 (0.66-1.06)0.1290.92 (0.71-1.19)0.520

  • Citation: Sasahira N, Hamada T, Togawa O, Yamamoto R, Iwai T, Tamada K, Kawaguchi Y, Shimura K, Koike T, Yoshida Y, Sugimori K, Ryozawa S, Kakimoto T, Nishikawa K, Kitamura K, Imamura T, Mizuide M, Toda N, Maetani I, Sakai Y, Itoi T, Nagahama M, Nakai Y, Isayama H. Multicenter study of endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(14): 3793-3802
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i14/3793.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i14.3793