Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2016; 22(13): 3511-3515
Published online Apr 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3511
Published online Apr 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3511
Phase III RCT | Compared arms | Status of RCT | Results |
French FFCD 2002-02 | Surgical resection vs RFA | Closed because of non accrual | Not published |
United States Nat Surg Adj Br Bow trial | CT + HAI vs CT + Resection or RFA | Closed because of non accrual | Not published |
CLOCC (median FU 4.4 yr)[22] | CT vs CT + RFA | Downscaled to Phase II trial because of slow accrual | OS: P = 0.22 |
PFS: P = 0.025 in favour of CT + RFA | |||
CLOCC (median FU 9.7 yr)[26] | CT vs CT + RFA | FU in progress | OS: P = 0.01 in favour of CT + RFA |
- Citation: Sartori S, Tombesi P, Di Vece F. Thermal ablation in colorectal liver metastases: Lack of evidence or lack of capability to prove the evidence? World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(13): 3511-3515
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i13/3511.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3511