Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2015.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2015; 21(48): 13490-13499
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13490
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13490
            Table 1 Patient characteristics
        
    | Variable | RFA (n = 38) | CyberKnief® (n = 35) | P value | 
| Observation period | 561 (range 222-1223) | 379 (range 203-1065) | 0.15 | 
| Age (yr), mean ± SD | 68.7 ± 10.5 (range 42-86) | 75.1.7 ± 8.1 (range 55-89) | 0.005 | 
| Gender | 0.82 | ||
| Male/female | 27/11 | 24/11 | |
| Etiology | 0.32 | ||
| HBV/HCV/alchol/other | 9/18/3/8 | 4/23/1/7 | |
| Child-Push classification, A/B | 31/7 | 28/7 | 0.86 | 
| Tumor size | 17.5 ± 6.1 (range 7-29) | 28.6 ± 11.5 (range 12-50) | 0.001 | 
            Table 2 Risk factor of intrahepatic distant recurrence in the radiofrequency ablation group
        
    | RFA | |||
| Distant recurrence (-) | Distant recurrence (+) | P value | |
| n | 29 | 9 | |
| Tumor size (mm) | 17.4 ± 6.2 | 17.8 ± 6.0 | 0.87 | 
            Table 3 Risk factor of intrahepatic distant recurrence in the CyberKnife® group
        
    | CyberKnife® | |||
| Distant recurrence (-) | Distant recurrence (+) | P value | |
| n | 28 | 7 | |
| Tumor size (mm) | 26.6 ± 11.1 | 36.3 ± 10.6 | 0.045 | 
| Total dose (Gy) | 50.6 ± 7.8 | 43.6 ± 6.7 | 0.036 | 
- Citation: Shiozawa K, Watanabe M, Ikehara T, Matsukiyo Y, Kogame M, Kishimoto Y, Okubo Y, Makino H, Tsukamoto N, Igarashi Y, Sumino Y. Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and CyberKnife® for initial solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: A pilot study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(48): 13490-13499
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i48/13490.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13490

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        