Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2015; 21(43): 12421-12429
Published online Nov 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12421
Published online Nov 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12421
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and virological responses at week 48 between groups A and B
All patients | Group A | Group B | P value | |
(n = 231) | (n = 112) | (n = 119) | ||
Age (yr) | 32.5 ± 10.1 | 32.6 ± 9.78 | 32.5 ± 10.4 | 0.96 |
Male (%) | 172 (74.4) | 83 (74.1) | 89 (74.8) | 0.99 |
ALT (IU/L) | 113 ± 115 | 113 ± 117 | 113 ± 116 | 0.75 |
AST (IU/L) | 64 ± 74 | 65 ± 75 | 62 ± 67 | 0.74 |
PLT (× 109/L) | 167.7 ± 57.3 | 170.0 ± 53.9 | 165.7 ± 60.5 | 0.56 |
HBeAg-positive (%) | 178 (77.0) | 89 (79.5) | 89 (74.8) | 0.43 |
HBV DNA at baseline | 7.36 ± 1.20 | 7.38 ± 1.15 | 7.35 ± 1.25 | 0.11 |
(log10 IU/mL) | ||||
HBV DNA at week | 1.81 ± 0.85 | 1.74 ± 0.83 | 1.88 ± 0.87 | 0.08 |
48 (log10 IU/mL) | ||||
HBV DNA-negative | 111 (48.1) | 54 (48.2) | 56 (47.1) | 0.86 |
(< 20 IU/mL) | ||||
HBeAg seroconversion | 19 (8.2) | 10 (8.9) | 9 (7.6) | 0.71 |
in HBeAg-positive patients | ||||
ALT normalization | 176 (76.2) | 85 (75.9) | 91 (76.5) | 0.91 |
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of all populations with respect to hepatitis B virus DNA response at week 48
Virological response at week 48 | |||
CVR | PVR | P value | |
(n = 119) | (n = 112) | ||
Age (yr) | 34.9 ± 10.9 | 30.2 ± 8.8 | < 0.0011 |
Male (%) | 78 (70.3) | 94 (80.8) | 0.16 |
ALT (IU/L) | 120 ± 130 | 108 ± 88 | 0.05 |
AST (IU/L) | 78 ± 87 | 57 ± 41 | 0.0011 |
PLT (× 109/L ) | 160 ± 55 | 175 ± 58 | 0.07 |
HBeAg-positive (%) | 71 (64) | 107 (89) | < 0.0012 |
HBV DNA | 6.88 ± 1.23 | 7.78 ± 0.92 | < 0.0012 |
(log10 IU/mL) | |||
Group A (%) | 55 (50) | 57 (47.5) | 0.75 |
Genotype | 0.77 | ||
B | 56 (51.4) | 53 (48.6) | |
C | 65 (58.5) | 57 (47.5) | |
FIB-4 index | 2.01 ± 1.43 | 1.21 ± 0.76 | 0.0031 |
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of 178 hepatitis B e antigen-positive and 53 hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients with respect to hepatitis B virus DNA response at week 48
HBeAg-positive (n = 178) | HBeAg-negative (n = 53) | |||||
CVR | PVR | P value | CVR | PVR | P value | |
(n = 71) | (n = 107) | (n = 48) | (n = 5) | |||
Age (yr) | 32.1 ± 9.9 | 29.7 ± 8.7 | 0.09 | 39.2 ± 10.3 | 35.2 ± 11.7 | 0.22 |
Male n (%) | 49 (69) | 88 (82) | 0.041 | 29 (72) | 6 (46) | 0.08 |
ALT (IU/L) | 121 ± 143 | 107 ± 90 | 0.108 | 118 ± 124 | 120 ± 74 | 0.89 |
AST (IU/L) | 82 ± 88 | 56 ± 42 | 0.0021 | 73 ± 76 | 67 ± 92 | 0.75 |
PLT (× 109/L) | 158 ± 53 | 175 ± 58 | 0.05 | 163 ± 58 | 181 ± 75 | 0.97 |
HBV DNA | 7.26 ± 1.05 | 7.92 ± 0.89 | 0.0011 | 6.32 ± 1.29 | 6.62 ± 0.87 | 0.15 |
(log10 IU/mL) | ||||||
Group A, n (%) | 39 (55) | 51 (47) | 0.34 | 19 (39) | 4 (80) | 0.08 |
FIB-4 index | 1.89 ± 1.43 | 1.18 ± 0.69 | 0.0011 | 2.17 ± 1.44 | 1.92 ± 1.67 | 0.84 |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of factors predicting maintained viral suppression in relation to virological response at week 48 using the Cox proportional hazard model in hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients
Maintained viral suppression at week 144 | |||
HR | 95%CI | P value | |
Age (yr) | 1.008 | 0.98-1.04 | 0.54 |
Sex | 0.927 | 0.694-1.325 | 0.68 |
ALT (IU/L) | 1.000 | 0.997-1.004 | 0.81 |
AST (IU/L) | 1.001 | 0.994-1.000 | 0.77 |
PLT (× 109/L ) | 0.998 | 0.994-1.000 | 0.40 |
HBeAg-positive | 1.326 | 0.918-1.916 | 0.13 |
Baseline HBV DNA | 0.781 | 0.678-0.900 | < 0.001 |
(log10 IU/mL) | |||
HBV DNA at week 48 | 0.768 | 0.694-0.993 | < 0.001 |
(log10 IU/mL) | |||
FIB-4 index | 0.737 | 0.452-1.199 | 0.22 |
Table 5 Comparison of FIB-4 index between complete virological response and partial virological response groups from baseline to 144 wk
HBeAg-positive (n = 178) | HBeAg-negative (n = 53) | |||||
CVR (n = 71) | PVR (n value = 107) | P value | CVR (n = 48) | PVR (n = 5) | P value | |
0 wk | 1.89 ± 1.43 | 1.18 ± 0.69 | < 0.001 | 2.17 ± 1.44 | 1.92 ± 1.66 | 0.71 |
48wk | 1.20 ± 0.81 | 0.94 ± 0.57 | 0.007 | 1.50 ± 0.89 | 1.52 ± 0.82 | 0.79 |
144 wk | 1.24 ± 0.87 | 1.02 ± 0.73 | 0.06 | 1.49 ± 0.90 | 1.12 ± 0.44 | 0.37 |
48-144 wk | -0.11 ± 0.47 | -0.13 ± 0.49 | 0.71 | -0.02 ± 0.34 | -0.07 ± 0.38 | 0.44 |
0-144 wk | 0.64 ± 1.25 | 0.15 ± 0.72 | 0.004 | 0.68 ± 0.95 | 0.81 ± 1.25 | 0.79 |
Table 6 Comparison of FIB-4 index between groups a and b from baseline to 144 wk
Group a (n = 120) | Group b (n = 58) | P value | |
0 wk | 1.56 ± 1.14 | 1.27 ± 0.99 | 0.11 |
144 wk | 1.12 ± 0.81 | 1.10 ± 0.78 | 0.89 |
0-144 wk | 0.44 ± 0.99 | 0.17 ± 0.98 | 0.09 |
- Citation: Li N, Xu JH, Yu M, Wang S, Si CW, Yu YY. Relationship between virological response and FIB-4 index in chronic hepatitis B patients with entecavir therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(43): 12421-12429
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i43/12421.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12421