Park JH, Lee SH, Park JM, Park CS, Park KS, Kim ES, Cho KB. Prediction of the indication criteria for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(39): 11160-11167 [PMID: 26494970 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i39.11160]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Si Hyung Lee, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, 170 Hyeonchungro, Nam-gu, Daegu 705-717, South Korea. dr9696@nate.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2015; 21(39): 11160-11167 Published online Oct 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i39.11160
Table 1 Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer (n = 2270) by multivariate analysis
OR
95%CI
P value
Tumor size ≤ 30 mm vs > 30 mm
2.1
1.5-3.0
< 0.001
Depth of invasion
M vs SM1
1.6
1.0-2.4
< 0.001
M vs SM2
4.7
3.0-7.2
0.040
Lymphatic invasion
4.1
2.8-6.0
< 0.001
Vascular invasion
4.7
3.1-7.1
< 0.001
Table 2 Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in intramucosal gastric cancer (n = 1340) by univariate analysis n (%)
Negative
Positive
P value
Gender
0.217
Male/female
843/458
29/10
Age
58.5 ± 11.8
50.6 ± 14.5
< 0.001
Size of tumor (mm, mean ± SD)
23.5 ± 15.7
37.9 ± 28.6
< 0.001
Tumor size
< 0.001
≤ 30 mm
961 (81)
18 (54)
> 30 mm
224 (19)
15 (46)
Tumor location
0.052
Upper
192 (15)
14 (36)
Middle
736 (59)
19 (48)
Lower
324 (26)
6 (16)
Lauren
< 0.001
Intestine type
634 (61)
11 (38)
Diffuse type
371 (36)
16 (55)
Mix type
33 (3)
2 (7)
Histologic type
0.715
Differentiated
799 (62)
20 (53)
Undifferentiated
498 (38)
18 (47)
Ulcer finding
0.757
Absence/presence
619/550
14/14
Lymphatic invasion
< 0.001
Absence/presence
1202/93
23/15
Vascular invasion
< 0.001
Absence/presence
1272/22
22/17
Perineural invasion
< 0.001
Absence/presence
1279/13
36/3
Table 3 Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal gastric cancer (n = 930) by univariate analysis n (%)
Negative
Positive
P value
Gender
0.369
Male/female
497/254
119/60
Age
61.0 ± 11.3
60.2 ± 11.4
< 0.001
Size of tumor (mm, mean ± SD)
27.0 ± 14.8
36.1 ± 19.9
< 0.001
Tumor size
< 0.001
≤ 20 mm
512 (73)
94 (55)
> 20 mm
188 (27)
76 (45)
Tumor location
0.651
Upper
157 (21)
34 (20)
Middle
376 (50)
93 (52)
Lower
223 (29)
52 (28)
Lauren
0.514
Intestine type
343 (56)
69 (47)
Diffuse type
215 (35)
63 (43)
Mix type
52 (9)
16 (10)
Histologic type
0.884
Differentiated
489 (65)
113 (63)
Undifferentiated
258 (35)
66 (37)
Ulcer finding
0.115
Absence/presence
255/388
51/104
Lymphatic invasion
< 0.001
Absence/presence
526/222
47/130
Vascular invasion
< 0.001
Absence/presence
665/82
104/71
Perineural invasion
0.103
Absence/presence
693/56
157/22
Table 4 Lymph node metastasis according to the presence of ulcer, differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and the depth of invasion in early gastric cancer patients
Ulcer
Differentiation
VI
LI
Size
≤10 mm
> 10 mm
> 20 mm
> 30 mm
M
Ulcer negative
Differentiated
No
No
0/102
2/112
0/81
1/57
Yes
0/5
0/2
0/1
0/5
Yes
No
0
0
0
1/2
Yes
0
1/2
0/0
1/2
Undifferentiated
No
No
1/66
2/41
0/41
1/45
Yes
0/3
0/3
0/1
0/2
Yes
No
0
0
0
0
Yes
0
0
0/1
3/3
Ulcer positive
Differentiated
No
No
1/59
1/104
0/67
1/47
Yes
0/5
1/12
0/1
1/5
Yes
No
0
0
0
0
Yes
0/2
0/4
0/0
1/1
Undifferentiated
No
No
0/40
0/50
1/42
0/46
Yes
0/4
0/2
0/6
1/4
Yes
No
0
0
0
0
Yes
0/1
1/2
0/1
1/1
SM1
Ulcer negative
Differentiated
No
No
0/10
1/19
0/12
1/13
Yes
0/3
0/3
1/2
0/1
Yes
No
0
0
1/1
2/2
Yes
0
1/3
0/0
1/3
Undifferentiated
No
No
0/7
0/6
1/8
0/6
Yes
0
0/2
0/0
0/1
Yes
No
0
0
0
0
Yes
0
0/1
0/1
2/3
Ulcer positive
Differentiated
No
No
0/14
2/24
0/19
1/13
Yes
0/1
0/0
1/7
1/5
Yes
No
0
0/1
0/0
0
Yes
0
0/1
2/3
3/3
Undifferentiated
No
No
0/6
2/12
2/7
1/6
Yes
0/2
1/7
0/3
1/7
Yes
No
0
0
0
1/1
Yes
1/2
3/5
1/4
1/1
SM2
Ulcer negative
Differentiated
No
No
0/4
2/23
1/25
0/18
Yes
0
1/12
2/5
11/27
Yes
No
0/1
0/0
0/0
0
Yes
0/1
1/3
0/1
6/8
Undifferentiated
No
No
0/1
1/14
2/9
1/4
Yes
0/2
1/1
0/2
3/7
Yes
No
0/1
0/0
0/0
0
Yes
0/1
0/0
5/6
1/3
Ulcer positive
Differentiated
No
No
3/16
2/33
1/31
3/31
Yes
0/3
5/15
12/27
13/31
Yes
No
0
0
1/3
0/3
Yes
0/1
1/2
2/5
4/5
Undifferentiated
No
No
0/4
2/14
1/19
4/18
Yes
0/2
1/8
1/6
4/11
Yes
No
0
0
0/1
1/1
Yes
1/1
3/4
5/8
3/5
Citation: Park JH, Lee SH, Park JM, Park CS, Park KS, Kim ES, Cho KB. Prediction of the indication criteria for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(39): 11160-11167