Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2015; 21(36): 10336-10347
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10336
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10336
Authors | Treatment | Findings supportive of | |||
Predictive markers | Prognostic markers | Others | |||
VEGF-A | Llovet et al[11] | Sorafenib vs placebo | No predictive values | Low VEGF-A → longer OS | - |
Shao et al[12] | Sorafenib plus UFT | No predictive values | Low VEGF-A → longer OS | - | |
Miyahara et al[13] | Sorafenib | High VEGF → PD | No prognostic values | Not associated with PFS | |
IL-6 & 8 | Shao et al[12] | Sorafenib plus UFT | - | High IL-6 and IL-8 → shorter OS | High IL-6 and IL-8 → shorter PFS |
Ang-2 | Llovet et al[11] | Sorafenib vs placebo | No predictive values | High Ang-2 → shorter OS | - |
Miyahara et al[13] | Sorafenib | High Ang-2 → PD | No associations | High Ang-2 → shorter PFS | |
IGF-1 | Shao et al[20] | Sorafenib plus UFT or bevacizumab plus capecitabine | High IGF-1 → better DCR | High IGF-1 → longer OS | High IGF-1 → longer PFS |
TGF-β1 | Lin et al[23] | Sorafenib with or without UFT | - | High TGF-β1 → shorter OS | High TGF-β1 → shorter PFS |
HGF | Llovet et al[11] | Sorafenib vs placebo | Low HGF → better efficacy1 | - | - |
Miyahara et al[13] | Sorafenib | High HGF → PD | No associations | High HGF → shorter PFS | |
G-CSF | Miyahara et al[13] | Sorafenib | High G-CSF → PD | No associations | High G-CSF → shorter PFS |
AFP response | Shao et al[31] | Sorafenib or thalidomide with tegafur/uracilBevacizumab with capecitabine | AFP response → longer DCR | AFP response → longer OS | AFP response → longer PFS |
Personeni et al[32], Yau et al[33], and Kuzuya et al[34] | Sorafenib | AFP response → longer DCR | AFP response → longer OS | AFP response → longer PFS | |
Nakazawa et al[35] | Sorafenib | AFP elevation → PD | AFP elevation → shorter OS | AFP elevation → shorter PFS | |
Circulating endothelial cells or progenitors | Shao et al[46] | Sorafenib plus UFT | Increase in post-treatment total CEC or viable CEC → PD1 | High CEP → shorter OS | High CEP → shorter PFS |
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio | Zheng et al[52] | Sorafenib | High ratio → shorter TTP | High ratio → shorter OS | - |
ERK activity changes | Caraglia et al[55] | Sorafenib + octreotide | Post-treatment increase → PD | - | - |
Soluble c-Kit | Llovet et al[11] | Sorafenib vs placebo | High c-Kit → better efficacy1 | - | - |
Leptin | Miyahara et al[13] | Sorafenib | High leptin → PD | No associations | High leptin → shorter PFS |
LDH | Faloppi et al[56] | Sorafenib | - | LDH decrease → longer OS | LDH decrease → longer PFS |
Markers | Authors | Treatment | Findings supportive of | ||
Predictive markers | Prognostic markers | Others | |||
Tissue biomarkers | |||||
p-ERK expression | Abou-Alfa et al[57] | Sorafenib | High p-ERK → longer TTP | - | - |
Ozenne et al[58] | Sorafenib | No predictive values | - | - | |
Chen et al[59] | Sorafenib | High p-ERK → longer TTP | - | - | |
p-c-Jun expression | Hagiwara et al[61] | Sorafenib | High p-c-Jun expression → poor response, shorter TTP | p-c-Jun expression → shorter OS | - |
Clinical parameter | |||||
DCE-MRI | Hsu et al[63] | Sorafenib plus UFT | High baseline Ktrans or decreased Ktrans after treatment→ higher DCR | Vascular response1→ longer OS | Vascular response1→ longer PFS |
Positron emission tomography | Lee et al[68] | Sorafenib | - | Low SUV → longer OS | Low SUV → longer PFS |
Hypertension | Estfan et al[71] | Sorafenib | Hypertension → longer TTP (?)2 | Hypertension → longer OS | - |
Otsuka et al[72] | Sorafenib | No predictive values | No prognostic values | - | |
Skin toxicity | Otsuka et al[72] | Sorafenib | No predictive values | Skin toxicities → longer OS | - |
Lee et al[73] | Sorafenib | - | ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities → longer OS | ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities → longer PFS | |
Vincenzi et al[74] | Sorafenib | Early4≥ grade 1 skin toxicities → longer DCR and TTP | Early ≥ grade 1 skin toxicities → longer OS3 | - | |
Hepatitis etiology | Shao et al[78] | Sorafenib vs other treatments | Synthesized hazard ratio for overall mortality: 0.65 in patients with HCV etiology and 0.87 in patients with non-HCV etiology | ||
Novel approaches | |||||
FGF3/FGF4 amplification | Arao et al[79] | Sorafenib | FGF3/FGF4 amplification → higher tumor response | - | - |
VEGFA amplification | Horwitz et al[85] | Sorafenib | - | VEGFA amplification → longer OS | - |
p-Mapk14, p-Atf2 expression | Rudalska et al[86] | Sorafenib | - | High p-Mapk14 or p-Atf2 expression → shorter OS | - |
- Citation: Shao YY, Hsu CH, Cheng AL. Predictive biomarkers of sorafenib efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Are we getting there? World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(36): 10336-10347
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i36/10336.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10336