Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2015; 21(35): 10062-10071
Published online Sep 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10062
Published online Sep 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10062
Table 1 Weaknesses of diagnostic tests of coagulation in liver disease
| Primary haemostasis | |
| Platelet count | Detects risks of bleeding only at extreme levels |
| Bleeding time | Generally, does not predict bleeding risk |
| Platelet function analyser | Thrombopenia makes the interpretation difficult |
| Thromboelastometry | Little experience in cirrhotic patients |
| Platelet function assay Aggregometry | Thrombopenia makes the interpretation difficult |
| Membrane molecule expression | Specialized laboratory; mostly, in research setting |
| Soluble activation markers | |
| Platelet adhesion under flow conditions | |
| Molecular mechanisms | |
| Secondary haemostasis | |
| PT and APTT | Insensitive to plasma levels of the anticoagulants |
| Thrombin generation | Too complex for use in routine diagnostic laboratories |
| Thromboelastometry | No standardization of parameters in cirrhotic patients |
| Low predictive positive value | |
| Fibrinolysis | |
| Fibrinolysis markers | No clear evidence between hyperfibrinolysis and bleeding in cirrhotic patients |
| Euglobulin clot lysis time | Not widely available |
- Citation: Blasi A. Coagulopathy in liver disease: Lack of an assessment tool. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(35): 10062-10071
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i35/10062.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10062
