Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2015; 21(34): 9999-10007
Published online Sep 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9999
Published online Sep 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9999
Table 1 Pathological characteristics of the antrum-preserving double-tract reconstruction group and the Roux-en-Y reconstruction group
Pathologic characteristic | ADTR (n = 18) | RY (n = 37) | P value |
Sex ratio (Male:Female) | 17:1 | 31:6 | 0.406 |
Age (yr) | 61.94 ± 6.41 | 62.08 ± 7.98 | 0.950 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 21.50 ± 2.61 | 20.98 ± 2.66 | 0.683 |
Siewert type | 0.497 | ||
II | 7 | 11 | |
III | 11 | 26 | |
pT status | 0.744 | ||
T1a | 0 | 0 | |
T1b | 3 | 3 | |
T2 | 1 | 4 | |
T3 | 2 | 5 | |
T4a | 12 | 25 | |
Lymph node metastasis | 0.709 | ||
pN0 | 6 | 8 | |
pN1 | 4 | 9 | |
pN2 | 7 | 15 | |
pN3a | 1 | 5 | |
pN3b | 0 | 0 | |
Tumor TNM stage | 0.002 | ||
Ia | 3 | 0 | |
Ib | 2 | 0 | |
IIa | 1 | 4 | |
IIb | 1 | 6 | |
IIIa | 3 | 3 | |
IIIb | 7 | 7 | |
IIIc | 1 | 17 | |
Histological type | 0.002 | ||
Well differentiated | 3 | 16 | |
Moderately differentiated | 11 | 13 | |
Poorly differentiated | 4 | 8 |
Table 2 Comparison of perioperative outcomes between the antrum-preserving double-tract reconstruction group and the Roux-en-Y reconstruction group
Clinical feature | ADTR (n = 18) | RY (n = 37) | P value |
Postoperative hospital stay (d) | 12.88 ± 5.81 | 14.08 ± 5.85 | 0.495 |
Operating time (min) | 282.22 ± 77.93 | 274.86 ± 63.23 | 0.709 |
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | 362.77 ± 294.15 | 270.81 ± 148.22 | 0.601 |
First flatus time (d) | 2.94 ± 0.83 | 3.97 ± 1.11 | 0.002 |
Time to resume liquid diet (d) | 4.47 ± 1.28 | 6.11 ± 1.82 | 0.001 |
Table 3 Postoperative complications in the antrum-preserving double-tract reconstruction group and Roux-en-Y reconstruction groups
Complication | ADTR (n = 18) | RY (n = 37) | P value |
Anastomosis-related complications | |||
Anastomotic leakage | 1 | 0 | 0.148 |
Anastomotic stenosis | 0 | 1 | 0.481 |
Anastomotic hemorrhage | 0 | 0 | - |
Early complications | |||
Wound infection | 2 | 3 | 0.716 |
Respiratory infection | 1 | 4 | 0.525 |
Pleural effusion | 2 | 3 | 0.716 |
Lymphorrhagia | 1 | 3 | 0.732 |
Long-term complications | |||
Reflux esophagitis | 0 | 6 | 0.048 |
Cholelithiasis | 1 | 3 | 0.732 |
Tumor recurrence | 1 | 6 | 0.266 |
Tumor metastasis | 1 | 5 | 0.374 |
Overall postoperative complication | 3 | 7 | 0.839 |
Table 4 Univariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival among patients with gastrectomy
Characteristic | HR | 95%CI | P value |
Age | 1.110 | 1.04-1.19 | 0.003 |
Gender | 9.160 | 1.47-56.93 | 0.018 |
BMI | 0.821 | 0.68-0.99 | 0.039 |
Surgical method | 0.573 | 0.16-2.13 | 0.406 |
Intraoperative blood loss | 1.000 | 0.99-1.01 | 0.496 |
Length of postoperative hospital stay | 1.030 | 0.92-1.14 | 0.628 |
Pleural effusion | 24.280 | 5.53-106.50 | < 0.001 |
Time to first flatus | 0.685 | 0.49-0.96 | 0.448 |
Time to resuming a liquid diet | 0.685 | 0.49-0.96 | 0.026 |
Lymphorrhagia | 9.620 | 1.48-62.54 | 0.018 |
TNM stage | 2.310 | 1.59-3.35 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival among patients with gastrectomy
Characteristic | HR | 95%CI | P value |
Age | 1.13 | 1.06-1.22 | 0.001 |
Gender | 6.29 | 1.01-39.17 | 0.049 |
Pleural effusion | 22.77 | 4.35-119.124 | < 0.001 |
Time to resuming a liquid diet | 0.65 | 0.45-0.93 | 0.020 |
Lymphorrhagia | 15.14 | 1.84-124.47 | 0.011 |
TNM stage | |||
1 | 0 | 0 | 0.982 |
2 | 0.02 | 0.01-0.350 | 0.003 |
3 | 0.19 | 0.01-0.651 | 0.146 |
4 | 0.05 | 0.01-0.484 | 0.007 |
5 | 0.03 | 0.01-0.446 | 0.009 |
6 | 0.43 | 0.16-1.13 | 0.087 |
-
Citation: Xiao JW, Liu ZL, Ye PC, Luo YJ, Fu ZM, Zou Q, Wei SJ. Clinical comparison of antrum-preserving double tract reconstruction
vs roux-en-Y reconstruction after gastrectomy for Siewert types II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(34): 9999-10007 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i34/9999.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9999