Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2015.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2015; 21(28): 8678-8686
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8678
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8678
            Table 1 Analytical studies on pancreatic cancer screening
        
    | Study | Type of study (number of subjects) | Country | Duration of follow-up | Measured outcome | 
| Canto et al[12], 2006 | Prospective controlled study | About 3 yr | Different diagnostic rate of PC, tumor type and screening complications | |
| (n = 227) | United States | |||
| Kim et al[13], 2011 | Retrospective | Different tumor type, curative resection, median survival, 3-yr survival rate | ||
| controlled study | Korea | - | ||
| (n = 60) | ||||
| Potjer et al[14], 2013 | Prospective controlled study | A minimum of 1 yr | Different tumor type, frequency and behavior of precursor lesions | |
| (n = 241) | Netherland | |||
| Lachter et al[15], 2007 | Retrospective | Different diagnostic rate of PC, the number of operations | ||
| controlled study | Israel | - | ||
| (n = 134) | ||||
| Zubarik et al[16], 2011 | Prospective controlled study | Different diagnostic rate of PC, tumor type, screening complications and cost of detection | ||
| (n = 670) | United States | 1 yr | 
            Table 2 Non-controlled studies on pancreatic cancer screening
        
    | Study (author/year) | Country | Study population n (HRIs%) | Period of time | Pancreatic tumor, n (%) | PC/death, n (%) | 
| Langer et al[17], 2009 | Germany | 76 (100) | 5 yr | 6 (7.9) | 0 (0)/0 (0) | 
| Rulyak et al[18], 2001 | United States | 35 (100) | 2 yr | 12 (34.3) | 0 (0)/0 (0) | 
| Sud et al[19], 2014 | United States | 30 (63.3) | 3 yr | 3 (10) | 2 (6.7)/0 (0) | 
| Al-Sukhni et al[20], 2012 | Canada | 262 (60.9) | 8 yr | 84 (32.1) | 3 (1.1)/2 (0.8%) | 
| Verna et al[21], 2010 | United States | 51 (100) | 3 yr | 20 (39.2) | 2 (3.9)/0 (0) | 
| Poley et al[22], 2009 | Netherland | 44 (47.7) | 2 yr | 10 (22.7) | 3 (6.8)/2 (4.5) | 
| Ludwig et al[23], 2011 | United States | 109 (100) | 7 yr | 9 (8.3) | 1 (0.9)/0 (0) | 
| Brentnall et al[24], 1999 | United States | 14 (100) | 15 mo | 7 (50) | 0 (0)/0 (0) | 
| Canto et al[25], 2012 | United States | 216 (90) | 28.8 mo | 92 (45.6) | 0 (0)/0 (0) | 
            Table 3 Studies on precursor lesions
        
    | Category | Surgery, n | Follow-up, n | Complications and prognosis | 
| PanIN | 17 | 0 | Just one patient had a fistula after surgery | 
| IPMN | 11 | 97 | No relapse or canceration after surgery or follow-up | 
| IPMN + PanIN | 6 | 0 | No relapse or canceration after surgery | 
| Mass lesions | 3 | 0 | One patient died after surgery; two patients relapsed then treated with chemotherapy | 
| Cytological HGD | 7 | 0 | No relapse or canceration after surgery; one patient had hemorrhage 13 mo later | 
            Table 4 Prospective studies on psychological function
        
    | Study | Country | Type of study (number of subjects) | Result | 
| Maheu et al[29], 2010 | Canada | Prospective controlled study (n = 198) | Non-significant increase in risk perception, cancer worry, or general distress | 
| Breitkopf et al[30], 2012 | United States | Prospective controlled study (n = 1406) | HRIs had a greater perceived risk of PC and higher levels of PC worry than controls | 
- Citation: Lu C, Xu CF, Wan XY, Zhu HT, Yu CH, Li YM. Screening for pancreatic cancer in familial high-risk individuals: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(28): 8678-8686
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i28/8678.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8678

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        