Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2015; 21(22): 6769-6784
Published online Jun 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6769
Published online Jun 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6769
Table 1 Key studies of portal vein thrombosis and liver transplantation
Number of patients | Prevalence PVT, n (%) | PVT characteristics | Outcomes | |
Englesbe et al[65] | 22291 (2001-2007) | 897 (4.02) | Not described | PVT was not predictive of waiting list mortality (HR = 0.90, P = 0.23) |
PVT was predictive of post-transplant mortality (HR = 1.32, P = 0.02) | ||||
Sringeri et al[61] | 1491 (2000-Aug 2012) | 119 (8.0) | Not described | Prolonged theatre timea, increased blood transfusion rates1. No difference mortality up-to 140 mo |
Ravaioli et al[13] | 889 (1998-2008) | 91 (10.2) | Partial 51 (56%) | No difference 1 yr (85% vs 86%) and 5 yr (68% vs 73%) survival between PVT and non-PVT subjects |
Complete 40 (44%) | Survival improved significantly for patients with complete PVT in the second era (2003-2008) (57% vs 89% at 1 yr1) | |||
Yerdel et al[15] | 779 (1987-1996) | 63 (8.1) | Grade 1: 24, | Reduced 5 yr survival between PVT and non-PVT subjects (65.3% vs 76.3%1) |
Grade 2: 23, | ||||
Grade 3: 6, | But improved 5 yr survival from 1st to 2nd era in all patients (from 72% to 83%1) | |||
Grade 4: 10 |
Table 2 Summary of studies reporting the use of anticoagulation for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis
Study type | n (controls) | Baseline severity liver disease | Duration and type of anticoagulation | PVT characteristics(none/partial/complete occlusion) | Recanalisation | Partial recanalisation/ stabilisation | Progression | Bleeding complicaitons | |
Francoz et al[7] | Prospective case control | 19 (10) | mean MELD 12.8 | Warfarin (INR 2-3) | 0/18/1 | 8/19 (42%) vs 0/10 non-anti-coagulated (P = 0.002) | 0 | 1 | 1 bleeding episode following endoscopic variceal band ligation |
Mean 8.1 mo | |||||||||
Amitrano et al[83] | Prospective | 28 | ? | Enoxaparin 200 IU/kg per day: 6 mo for responders and non-responders. Partial responders continue until end of follow up. | 0/23/5 | 21 (75%) at median 11 mo | 5 (17.9%) | 2 | Mild anaemia in patient with portal hypertensive gastropathy |
Delgado et al[84] | Retrospective | 55 | mean MELD 12.8 +/- 3.8 | Warfarin (INR 2-3) or enoxaparin mean 6.8 mo | 0/41/14 | 25 (45.5%) | 30 (54.5%) | 0 | 6 variceal bleeds, 1 lower GI bleed, 1 obscure GI bleed, 1 oral bleed post-dental extraction, 1 severe vaginal bleed |
Senzolo et al[85] | Prospective case control | 33 (21) | MELD 12.6 (controls MELD 13.7) | Nadraparin low molecular weight heparin until end of follow up, or until 6 mo following complete recanalisation. | 0/24/11 | 12/33 (36%) active arm vs 1/21 (5%) controls | Partial: 9/33 active arm. Stabilisation: 7/33 active arm. Partial recanalisation or stabilisation in 5/21 controls. | 5/33 (14.3%) active arm vs 15/21 (71.4%) control arm (P < 0.001) | Active arm: 1 cerebral haemorrhage, 1 epistaxis, 1 haematuria, 1 variceal bleed |
Control arm: 5 variceal bleeds | |||||||||
Werner et al[86] | Retrospective | 28 | MELD 7-29 | Warfarin | not described | 11 (39.3%) | 17 (60.7%) | 0 | 1 significant vaginal bleed |
Mean 302 d | |||||||||
Villa et al[55] | Prospective randomised controlled trial | 34 (36) | Child’s 7-10 | Enoxaparin 4000 IU/d | Primary prevention study: No PVTs at baseline | N/A | N/A | Treatment arm: No PVT at 2 yr. Control arm: PVT in 10/36 (27.8%) at 2 yr (P = 0.001) | Active arm: 2 variceal bleeds, 2 epistaxis |
48 wk treatment. Follow up to 2 yr | Control arm: 1 variceal bleed, 1 epistaxis |
Table 3 Summary of new oral anti-coagulants
Name | Dabigatran | Apixaban | Edoxaban | Rivaroxaban |
Action | Direct thrombin inhibitor | Activated factor Xa inhibitor | Activated factor Xa inhibitor | Activated factor Xa inhibitor |
Clearance | 80% renal clearance | 73% hepatic | 50% hepatic | 65% hepatic |
27% renal clearance | 50% renal clearance | 35% renal clearance | ||
CYP3A4 interaction? | No | Yes (minor) | Minimal | Yes |
Absorption with food? | No effect | No effect | Up to 20% more | 40% more therefore intake with food |
Elimination half life | 12-17 h | 12 h | 9-11 h | 8-9 h young |
11-13 h elderly |
Table 4 Summary of retrospective case series reporting the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis
Study type and stent characteristics | n | Baseline severity liver disease: Child’s A/B/C (%) | TIPSS indication (%) | PVT characteristics: Complete/ partial/ cavernoma (%) | Successful cannulation (%) | Outcome | Significant complications/ notes | |
Luca et al[102] | Series 2003-2010 | 70 | A: 17 (24) | Bleeding: 48 | Complete: 24 | 70/70 (100) cannulation. | Complete recanalisation in 40 (57%): 38 maintained patency at mean follow up 20.7 mo. | |
13 bare Wallstent, 57 covered Viatorr ePTFE covered (WL Gore and Associates) | B: 42 (60) | Ascites/ hydrothorax: 18 | Cavernoma: 2 | Complete recanalisation or significant reduction in thrombosis: 61 (87) | ||||
C: 11 (16) | Specific treatment of PVT: 4 | |||||||
Perarnau et al[100] | Series 1990-2004 | 34 | A: 3 (14) | Bleeding: 27 (79) | Complete acute: 15 | No cavernoma: 15/15 (100) | Mean F/U 30 mo. | Failed cannulation in presence of thrombosed intrahepatic PV branches or peri-hilar cavernoma |
Palmaz (Cordis) or Wallstent (Boston Scientific) bare stents | B: 11 (52) | Ascites: 5 (15) | Complete + cavernoma: 19 | Cavernoma: 12/19 (63) | 26/34 (72%) long-term patency | |||
C: 7 (33) | Other: 2 | |||||||
(incomplete details) | ||||||||
Senzolo et al[104] | Series 1994-2005 | 28 (15 non-cirrhotic) | Not stated | Bleeding: 15 | Complete: 8 (3 with, 5 without cavernoma) | 19/28 (73%) | Primary patency mean 18 mo in 14/19. | |
26 Memotherms (Angiomed) bare stents, 3 Viatorr covered stents | Ascites: 5 | Partial: 5 | Stent thrombosis in 2 non-cirrhotic subjects (Budd-Chiari syndrome) | |||||
Portal biliopathy: 3 | ||||||||
Specific treatment PVT: 1 | ||||||||
Han et al[99] | Series 2001-2008 | 57 | A: 25 (44) | Bleeding: 56 | Complete: 14 | Overall: 43/57 (75) | Primary patency maintained in 26/43 (17 required shunt revisions to maintain patency) | Failure related to presence of cavernoma. |
Uncovered stents in all patients | B: 26 (46) | Ascites: 1 | Cavernoma: 30 | Complete PVT: 8/14 (57) | 1 case of delayed severe intra-abdominal haemorrhage following percutaneous trans-hepatic approach. | |||
C: 6 (30) | Partial: 35 | Partial PVT: 35/35 (100) | ||||||
Cavernoma: 16/30 (53%) | ||||||||
Van Ha et al[106] | Series 1995-2003 | 15 | B: 11 (73) | Bleeding: 10 | Complete: 4/partial: 7/complete with cavernoma: 4 | Overall: 13/15 (87) | Mean F/U 17 mo. | |
12 bare Wallstent (Boston Scientific), 1 bare Zilver stent (Cook) | C: 4 (27) | Ascites: 5 | Cavernoma: 3/4 | 1 stent occlusion | ||||
No cavernoma: 10/11 (91) | ||||||||
D’Avola et al[101] | Series 1995-2009 | 15 (+ 8 controls with PVT) | Mean Child’s 8 | Prevention of complete PVT pre-liver transplant: 8 | All partial PVT | Series describes only patients who successfully underwent TIPSS | 3/15 TIPSS thrombosis: all successfully treated. | |
Bare and covered stents | Bleeding: 6 | Median time TIPSS to transplant: 185 d. | ||||||
Ascites: 1 | 100% portal vein patency at time of transplant vs 50% patency at transplant in controls (P = 0.008) | |||||||
Bauer et al[103] | Series 1999-2005 | 9 | Cirrhosis: disease severity not stated | Primary indication: maintain PV patency for future liver transplantation | Complete: 7 | Series describing only patients who successfully underwent TIPSS | 1/9 re-thrombosed. | |
3 covered stents: others bare stent | Partial: 2 | 2 patients transplanted with no PVT present | ||||||
Cavernoma: 4 | ||||||||
Blum et al[114] | Case series | 7 | Cirrhosis: disease severity not stated | Bleeding: 7 | PVT severity not stated. | Series of successful cases | ||
All bare stents | No cavernoma. |
- Citation: Harding DJ, Perera MTP, Chen F, Olliff S, Tripathi D. Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: Controversies and latest developments. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(22): 6769-6784
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i22/6769.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6769