Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6352-6360
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6352
Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis
Ref.Study typeFollow-up periodsGroupDrugDrug dosageNumber of casesAge, yrMale
Feaganet al[14], 2005RCT6 wkIntervention 1MLN-020.5 mg/kg5841.6 ± 14.756.9%
Intervention 22 mg/kg6043.8 ± 14.650.0%
ControlPlaceboNA6338.9 ± 13.455.6%
Feagan et al[15], 2013Randomized allocation6 wkInterventionVedolizumab300 mg74640.1 ± 13.258.0%
ControlPlaceboNA14941.1 ± 1.2561.7%
Parikh et al[16], 2012RCT43 dIntervention 1Vedolizumab2 mg/kg1239 (30-49)133.3%
Intervention 26 mg/kg1447 (19-61)150.0%
Intervention 310 mg/kg1141 (26-69)145.5%
ControlPlaceboNA933 (21-51)133.3%
Table 2 Clinical response and clinical remission rates of studies included in the meta-analysis
Ref.GroupDrugDefinition of clinical responseClinical response rateDefinition of clinical remissionClinical remission rate
Feagan et al[14]Intervention 1MLN-02An improvement of 3 points or more on the ulcerative colitis clinical score (modification of the Mayo Clinic Scoring system)66%59.3%1Ulcerative colitis clinical score of 0 or 1 and a modified Baron score of 0 or 1 with no evidence of rectal bleeding32.2%1
Intervention 253%
ControlPlacebo33%14.0%
Feagan et al[15]InterventionVedolizumabA reduction in the Mayo Clinic score of at least 3 points and a decrease of at least 30% from baseline, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 147.1%Mayo Clinic score of 2 or lower and no subscore higher than 1, and mucosal healing, defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 116.9%
ControlPlacebo25.5%5.4%
Parikh et al[16]Intervention 1VedolizumabA decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score (PMS) of ≥ 2 points and ≥ 25%, with an accompanying decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding of ≥ 1 point or an absolute subscore for rectal bleeding of 0 or 1.50%56.8%1PMS of ≤ 2 with no individual subscore > 158%1
Intervention 263.3%
Intervention 353.3%
ControlPlacebo33.3%50%
Table 3 Summary of most common adverse events (occurring in 10% or more of patients in any group)
Ref.GroupGeneral adverse events1
Ulcerative colitis aggravatedNausea/vomitingHeadacheFrequent bowel movementsFatigueUpper respiratory tract infectionAbdominal pain/tendernessArthralgiaDizzinessRash
Feagan et al[14]Intervention 129 (50)21 (36)12 (21)10 (17)8 (14)8 (14)10 (17)4 (7)6 (10)6 (10)
Intervention 222 (37)13 (22)11 (18)5 (8)5 (8)8 (13)6 (10)7 (12)4 (7)4 (7)
Control24 (38)15 (24)13 (21)10 (16)7 (11)5 (8)16 (25)5 (8)1 (2)4 (6)
Feagan et al[15]Intervention97 (13)38 (5)80 (11)NA33 (4)132 (18)50 (7)56 (8)NANA
Control58 (39)19 (13)28 (19)NA10 (7)47 (32)10 (7)25 (17)NANA
Parikh et al[16]Intervention 12 (17)NA2 (17)NANA4 (33)NANA1 (8)NA
Intervention 21 (7)NA3 (21)NANA3 (21)NANA0 (0)NA
Intervention 30 (0)NA2 (18)NANA1 (9)NANA0 (0)NA
Control4 (44)NA1 (11)NANA4 (44)NANA1 (11)NA
Feagan et al[14]Intervention 16 (10)NANANANANANA6 (10)18 (15)2
Intervention 23 (5)NANANANANANA12 (20)
Control8 (13)NANANANANANA6 (10)
Feagan et al[15]InterventionNA35 (5)13 (2)NANANANA77 (10)
ControlNA16 (11)36 (24)NANANANA37 (25)
Parikh et al[16]Intervention 1NANA0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (8)0 (0)1 (8)2 (5)2
Intervention 2NANA2 (14)2 (14)2 (14)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Intervention 3NANA0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (9)1 (9)
ControlNANA0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (11)1 (11)0 (0)