Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6352-6360
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6352
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6352
Ref. | Study type | Follow-up periods | Group | Drug | Drug dosage | Number of cases | Age, yr | Male |
Feaganet al[14], 2005 | RCT | 6 wk | Intervention 1 | MLN-02 | 0.5 mg/kg | 58 | 41.6 ± 14.7 | 56.9% |
Intervention 2 | 2 mg/kg | 60 | 43.8 ± 14.6 | 50.0% | ||||
Control | Placebo | NA | 63 | 38.9 ± 13.4 | 55.6% | |||
Feagan et al[15], 2013 | Randomized allocation | 6 wk | Intervention | Vedolizumab | 300 mg | 746 | 40.1 ± 13.2 | 58.0% |
Control | Placebo | NA | 149 | 41.1 ± 1.25 | 61.7% | |||
Parikh et al[16], 2012 | RCT | 43 d | Intervention 1 | Vedolizumab | 2 mg/kg | 12 | 39 (30-49)1 | 33.3% |
Intervention 2 | 6 mg/kg | 14 | 47 (19-61)1 | 50.0% | ||||
Intervention 3 | 10 mg/kg | 11 | 41 (26-69)1 | 45.5% | ||||
Control | Placebo | NA | 9 | 33 (21-51)1 | 33.3% |
Ref. | Group | Drug | Definition of clinical response | Clinical response rate | Definition of clinical remission | Clinical remission rate | |
Feagan et al[14] | Intervention 1 | MLN-02 | An improvement of 3 points or more on the ulcerative colitis clinical score (modification of the Mayo Clinic Scoring system) | 66% | 59.3%1 | Ulcerative colitis clinical score of 0 or 1 and a modified Baron score of 0 or 1 with no evidence of rectal bleeding | 32.2%1 |
Intervention 2 | 53% | ||||||
Control | Placebo | 33% | 14.0% | ||||
Feagan et al[15] | Intervention | Vedolizumab | A reduction in the Mayo Clinic score of at least 3 points and a decrease of at least 30% from baseline, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1 | 47.1% | Mayo Clinic score of 2 or lower and no subscore higher than 1, and mucosal healing, defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 | 16.9% | |
Control | Placebo | 25.5% | 5.4% | ||||
Parikh et al[16] | Intervention 1 | Vedolizumab | A decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score (PMS) of ≥ 2 points and ≥ 25%, with an accompanying decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding of ≥ 1 point or an absolute subscore for rectal bleeding of 0 or 1. | 50% | 56.8%1 | PMS of ≤ 2 with no individual subscore > 1 | 58%1 |
Intervention 2 | 63.3% | ||||||
Intervention 3 | 53.3% | ||||||
Control | Placebo | 33.3% | 50% |
Ref. | Group | General adverse events1 | |||||||||
Ulcerative colitis aggravated | Nausea/vomiting | Headache | Frequent bowel movements | Fatigue | Upper respiratory tract infection | Abdominal pain/tenderness | Arthralgia | Dizziness | Rash | ||
Feagan et al[14] | Intervention 1 | 29 (50) | 21 (36) | 12 (21) | 10 (17) | 8 (14) | 8 (14) | 10 (17) | 4 (7) | 6 (10) | 6 (10) |
Intervention 2 | 22 (37) | 13 (22) | 11 (18) | 5 (8) | 5 (8) | 8 (13) | 6 (10) | 7 (12) | 4 (7) | 4 (7) | |
Control | 24 (38) | 15 (24) | 13 (21) | 10 (16) | 7 (11) | 5 (8) | 16 (25) | 5 (8) | 1 (2) | 4 (6) | |
Feagan et al[15] | Intervention | 97 (13) | 38 (5) | 80 (11) | NA | 33 (4) | 132 (18) | 50 (7) | 56 (8) | NA | NA |
Control | 58 (39) | 19 (13) | 28 (19) | NA | 10 (7) | 47 (32) | 10 (7) | 25 (17) | NA | NA | |
Parikh et al[16] | Intervention 1 | 2 (17) | NA | 2 (17) | NA | NA | 4 (33) | NA | NA | 1 (8) | NA |
Intervention 2 | 1 (7) | NA | 3 (21) | NA | NA | 3 (21) | NA | NA | 0 (0) | NA | |
Intervention 3 | 0 (0) | NA | 2 (18) | NA | NA | 1 (9) | NA | NA | 0 (0) | NA | |
Control | 4 (44) | NA | 1 (11) | NA | NA | 4 (44) | NA | NA | 1 (11) | NA | |
Feagan et al[14] | Intervention 1 | 6 (10) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 6 (10) | 18 (15)2 | |
Intervention 2 | 3 (5) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 (20) | |||
Control | 8 (13) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 6 (10) | |||
Feagan et al[15] | Intervention | NA | 35 (5) | 13 (2) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 77 (10) | ||
Control | NA | 16 (11) | 36 (24) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 37 (25) | |||
Parikh et al[16] | Intervention 1 | NA | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (8) | 0 (0) | 1 (8) | 2 (5)2 | |
Intervention 2 | NA | NA | 2 (14) | 2 (14) | 2 (14) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |||
Intervention 3 | NA | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (9) | 1 (9) | |||
Control | NA | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (11) | 1 (11) | 0 (0) |
- Citation: Jin Y, Lin Y, Lin LJ, Zheng CQ. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(20): 6352-6360
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i20/6352.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6352