Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6261-6270
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6261
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6261
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of enrolled patients n (%)
Characteristics | Total | CAC | SC | P value |
Patients | 1023 | 515 | 508 | |
mean age ± SD | 54.75 ± 10.52 | 55.06 ± 10.29 | 54.44 ± 10.74 | 0.342 |
Gender | 0.650 | |||
Male | 549 (53.7) | 280 (54.4) | 269 (53.0) | |
Female | 474 (46.3) | 235 (45.6) | 239 (47.0) | |
Withdrawal time of total colonoscopies (min) | 13.83 ± 7.50 | 14.67 ± 7.70 | 12.97 ± 7.20 | < 0.001 |
No. of patients of non therapeutic colonoscopies | 566 | 265 | 301 | |
Withdrawal time of non therapeutic colonoscopies (min) | 10.50 ± 3.75 | 10.68 ± 3.09 | 10.33 ± 4.24 | 0.272 |
Bowel preparation(Aronchick scale) | 0.244 | |||
Excellent | 38 (3.7) | 19 (3.7) | 19 (3.7) | |
Good | 646 (63.1) | 316 (61.4) | 330 (65.0) | |
Fair | 339 (33.1) | 180 (35.0) | 159 (31.3) |
Table 2 Polyp detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy on the all ages and both genders n (%)
Whole colon | Total (n = 1023) | CAC (n = 515) | SC (n = 508) | P value |
Total polyps | 967 | 549 | 418 | 0.008 |
Polyps per patient | 0.95 ± 1.46 | 1.07 ± 1.59 | 0.82 ± 1.31 | 0.008 |
PDR | 457 (44.7) | 250 (48.5) | 207 (40.7) | 0.012 |
Right-side colon | Total (n = 1023) | CAC (n = 515) | SC (n = 508) | P value |
Total polyps | 547 | 339 | 208 | < 0.001 |
Polyps per patient | 0.53 ± 1.03 | 0.66 ± 1.18 | 0.41 ± 0.83 | < 0.001 |
PDR | 317 (31.0) | 182 (35.3) | 135 (26.6) | 0.002 |
Polyps of segment | Total (n = 1023) | CAC (n = 515) | SC (n = 508) | P value |
Cecum | 85 | 42 | 43 | 0.888 |
Ascending colon | 266 | 179 | 87 | < 0.001 |
Hepatic flexure | 80 | 56 | 24 | 0.001 |
Transverse colon | 116 | 62 | 54 | 0.560 |
Splenic flexure | 30 | 24 | 6 | 0.001 |
Descending colon | 65 | 31 | 34 | 0.683 |
Sigmoid colon | 223 | 105 | 118 | 0.406 |
Rectum | 102 | 50 | 52 | 0.804 |
Table 3 Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy on the all ages and both genders n (%)
Whole colon | Total (n = 1023) | CAC (n = 515) | SC (n = 508) | P value |
Total adenomas | 623 | 370 | 253 | 0.003 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.61 ± 1.18 | 0.72 ± 1.32 | 0.50 ± 1.01 | 0.003 |
ADR | 328 (32.1) | 184 (35.7) | 144 (28.3) | 0.011 |
Right-side colon | Total (n = 1023) | CAC (n = 515) | SC (n = 508) | P value |
Total adenomas | 365 | 236 | 129 | < 0.001 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.36 ± 0.84 | 0.46 ± 0.97 | 0.25 ± 0.67 | < 0.001 |
ADR | 225 (22.0) | 139 (27.0) | 86 (16.9) | < 0.001 |
Adenomas of segment | Total (n = 1023) | CAC (n = 515) | SC (n = 508) | P value |
Cecum | 45 | 20 | 25 | 0.490 |
Ascending colon | 179 | 129 | 50 | < 0.001 |
Hepatic flexure | 62 | 44 | 18 | 0.002 |
Transverse colon | 79 | 43 | 36 | 0.529 |
Splenic flexure | 28 | 22 | 6 | 0.003 |
Descending colon | 46 | 23 | 23 | 0.966 |
Sigmoid colon | 130 | 61 | 69 | 0.490 |
Rectum | 54 | 28 | 26 | 0.829 |
Table 4 Total number of polyps and adenomas according to size
Total number | Total (n = 1023) | CAC (n = 515) | SC (n = 508) | P value |
Polyps < 5 mm, n | 698 | 398 | 300 | 0.011 |
Per patient | 0.68 ± 1.15 | 0.77 ± 1.27 | 0.59 ± 1.00 | 0.011 |
Adenomas < 5 mm, n | 418 | 253 | 165 | 0.003 |
per Patient | 0.41 ± 0.89 | 0.49 ± 1.03 | 0.32 ± 0.71 | 0.003 |
Polyps ≥ 5 mm, n | 269 | 151 | 118 | 0.168 |
per Patient | 0.26 ± 0.70 | 0.29 ± 0.76 | 0.23 ± 0.63 | 0.168 |
Adenomas ≥ 5 mm, n | 205 | 117 | 88 | 0.178 |
Per patient | 0.20 ± 0.64 | 0.23 ± 0.70 | 0.17 ± 0.56 | 0.178 |
Table 5 Polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and the number of polyps and adenomas of whole colon based on age n (%)
Whole colon | ||||
Age (yr) | Total | CAC | SC | P value |
20-49 | 308 | 147 | 161 | |
Polyps per patient | 0.51 ± 1.07 | 0.63 ± 1.32 | 0.41 ± 0.77 | 0.078 |
PDR | 94 (30.5) | 51 (34.7) | 43 (26.7) | 0.128 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.26 ± 0.77 | 0.37 ± 1.02 | 0.16 ± 0.41 | 0.013 |
ADR, | 57 (18.5) | 35 (23.8) | 22 (13.7) | 0.022 |
50-65 | 544 | 293 | 251 | |
Polyps per patient | 1.01 ± 1.47 | 1.09 ± 1.57 | 0.92 ± 1.34 | 0.194 |
PDR | 260 (47.8) | 146 (49.8) | 114 (45.4) | 0.305 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.67 ± 1.22 | 0.76 ± 1.34 | 0.57 ± 1.04 | 0.068 |
ADR | 190 (34.9) | 107 (36.5) | 83 (33.1) | 0.400 |
66-75 | 154 | 68 | 86 | |
Polyps per patient | 1.55 ± 1.84 | 1.93 ± 1.91 | 1.26 ± 1.74 | 0.024 |
PDR | 91 (59.1) | 47 (69.1) | 44 (51.2) | 0.024 |
Adenomas per patient | 1.04 ± 1.53 | 1.28 ± 1.62 | 0.85 ± 1.43 | 0.084 |
ADR | 71 (46.1) | 38 (55.9) | 33 (38.4) | 0.030 |
≥ 76 | 17 | 7 | 10 | |
Polyps per patient | 1.24 ± 1.20 | 1.14 ± 0.90 | 1.30 ± 1.41 | 0.959 |
PDR | 12 (70.6) | 6 (85.7) | 6 (60.0) | 0.338 |
Adenomas per patient | 1.00 ± 1.11 | 0.71 ± 0.75 | 1.20 ± 1.31 | 0.502 |
ADR | 10 (58.8) | 4 (57.1) | 6 (60.0) | 1.000 |
Table 6 Polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and the number of polyps and adenomas of right-side colon based on age n (%)
Right-side colon | ||||
Age (yr) | Total | CAC | SC | P value |
20-49 | 308 | 147 | 161 | |
Polyps per patient | 0.25 ± 0.82 | 0.35 ± 1.09 | 0.15 ± 0.45 | 0.030 |
PDR | 49 (15.9) | 30 (20.4) | 19 (11.8) | 0.039 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.13 ± 0.61 | 0.20 ± 0.83 | 0.06 ± 0.25 | 0.033 |
ADR | 28 (9.1) | 20 (13.6) | 8 (5.0) | 0.008 |
50-65 | 544 | 293 | 251 | |
Polyps per patient | 0.59 ± 1.00 | 0.68 ± 1.13 | 0.49 ± 0.82 | 0.025 |
PDR | 194 (35.7) | 110 (37.5) | 84 (33.5) | 0.322 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.41 ± 0.86 | 0.50 ± 1.00 | 0.31 ± 0.66 | 0.009 |
ADR | 138 (25.4) | 82 (28.0) | 56 (22.3) | 0.129 |
66-75 | 154 | 68 | 86 | |
Polyps per patient | 0.91 ± 1.31 | 1.21 ± 1.38 | 0.67 ± 1.21 | 0.012 |
PDR | 86 (55.8) | 38 (55.9) | 30 (34.9) | 0.009 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.62 ± 1.04 | 0.81 ± 0.99 | 0.47 ± 1.07 | 0.043 |
ADR | 54 (35.1) | 34 (50.0) | 20 (23.3) | 0.001 |
≥ 76 | 17 | 7 | 10 | |
Polyps per patient | 0.59 ± 1.00 | 0.86 ± 1.06 | 0.40 ± 0.96 | 0.167 |
PDR | 6 (35.3) | 4 (57.1) | 2 (20.0) | 0.162 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.41 ± 0.71 | 0.57 ± 0.78 | 0.30 ± 0.67 | 0.362 |
ADR | 5 (29.4) | 3 (42.9) | 2 (20.0) | 0.593 |
Table 7 Polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and the number of polyps and adenomas based on gender n (%)
Gender | Total | CAC | SC | P value |
Whole colon | ||||
Male, n | 549 | 280 | 269 | |
Polyps per patient | 1.25 ± 1.67 | 1.37 ± 1.84 | 1.12 ± 1.47 | 0.082 |
PDR | 300 (54.6) | 158 (56.4) | 142 (52.8) | 0.392 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.81 ± 1.38 | 0.90 ± 1.53 | 0.71 ± 1.20 | 0.109 |
ADR | 219 (39.9) | 114 (40.7) | 105 (39.0) | 0.688 |
Female | 474 | 235 | 239 | |
Polyps per patient | 0.60 ± 1.08 | 0.71 ± 1.14 | 0.49 ± 1.00 | 0.029 |
PDR | 157 (33.1) | 92 (39.1) | 65 (27.2) | 0.006 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.38 ± 0.84 | 0.50 ± 0.98 | 0.26 ± 0.67 | 0.002 |
ADR | 109 (23.0) | 70 (29.8) | 39 (16.3) | < 0.001 |
Right-side colon | ||||
Male | 549 | 280 | 269 | |
Polyps per patient | 0.70 ± 1.20 | 0.87 ± 1.39 | 0.52 ± 0.94 | 0.001 |
PDR | 205 (37.3) | 118 (42.1) | 87 (32.3) | 0.018 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.49 ± 1.00 | 0.60 ± 1.14 | 0.37 ± 0.82 | 0.007 |
ADR | 153 (27.9) | 90 (32.1) | 63 (23.4) | 0.023 |
Female | 474 | 235 | 239 | |
Polyps per patient | 0.35 ± 0.73 | 0.41 ± 0.78 | 0.28 ± 0.67 | 0.066 |
PDR | 112 (23.6) | 64 (27.2) | 48 (20.1) | 0.067 |
Adenomas per patient | 0.21 ± 0.56 | 0.29 ± 0.67 | 0.13 ± 0.42 | 0.002 |
ADR | 72 (15.2) | 49 (20.9) | 23 (9.6) | 0.001 |
Table 8 Polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate of trainees n (%)
Trainees | Total (n = 847) | CAC (n = 439) | SC (n = 408) | P value |
Whole colon | ||||
PDR | 367 (43.3) | 205 (46.7) | 162 (39.7) | 0.040 |
ADR | 255 (30.1) | 149 (33.9) | 106 (26.0) | 0.012 |
Right-side colon | ||||
PDR | 258 (30.5) | 150 (34.2) | 108 (26.5) | 0.015 |
ADR | 176 (20.8) | 111 (25.3) | 65 (15.9) | 0.001 |
Table 9 Polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate of experts n (%)
Experts | Total (n = 176) | CAC (n = 76) | SC (n = 100) | P value |
Whole colon | ||||
PDR | 90 (51.1) | 45 (59.2) | 45 (45.0) | 0.062 |
ADR | 73 (41.5) | 35 (46.1) | 38 (38.0) | 0.283 |
Right-side colon | ||||
PDR | 59 (33.5) | 32 (42.1) | 27 (27.0) | 0.035 |
ADR | 49 (27.8) | 28 (36.8) | 21 (21.0) | 0.020 |
- Citation: Kim DJ, Kim HW, Park SB, Kang DH, Choi CW, Hong JB, Ji BH, Lee CS. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(20): 6261-6270
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i20/6261.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6261