Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5961-5971
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5961
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5961
Table 1 The list of multiple immunological and nutritional-based prognostic indices for gastric cancer
Combined marker | Score |
Prognostic Nutritional Index | |
≥ 48.2 | 1 |
< 48.2 | 2 |
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio | |
≤ 1.83 | 1 |
> 1.83 | 2 |
Platelet-lymphocyte ratio | |
≤ 140 | 1 |
> 140 | 2 |
Canton score | |
PNI ≥ 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L | 0 |
PNI ≥ 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L | 1 |
PNI ≥ 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L | 1 |
PNI < 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L | 1 |
PNI ≥ 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L | 2 |
PNI < 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L | 2 |
PNI < 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L | 2 |
PNI < 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L | 3 |
Table 2 Relationship between clinicopathological factors, postoperative complications, and prognostic nutritional index
Variable | n (%) | PNI-H | PNI-L | P value |
Age (yr) | 0.407 | |||
≤ 65 | 445 (70.4) | 235 | 210 | |
> 65 | 187 (29.6) | 92 | 95 | |
Sex | 0.958 | |||
Male | 413 (65.3) | 214 | 199 | |
Female | 219 (34.7) | 113 | 106 | |
Resectability | < 0.001 | |||
0 | 509 (80.5) | 285 | 224 | |
1, 2 | 123 (19.5) | 42 | 81 | |
Tumor depth | 0.006 | |||
T1, T2 | 126 (19.9) | 79 | 47 | |
T3, T4 | 506 (80.1) | 248 | 258 | |
Lymph node | 0.015 | |||
N0 | 193 (30.5) | 114 | 79 | |
N1-3 | 439 (69.5) | 213 | 226 | |
Distant metastasis | < 0.001 | |||
M0 | 474 (75.0) | 266 | 208 | |
M1 | 158 (25.0) | 61 | 97 | |
Pathological stage | 0.002 | |||
I, II | 207 (32.8) | 125 | 82 | |
III, IV | 425 (67.2) | 202 | 223 | |
WBC | 0.279 | |||
≤ 11 × 109/L | 597 (94.5) | 312 | 285 | |
> 11 × 109/L | 35 (5.5) | 15 | 20 | |
ALB | < 0.001 | |||
≥ 35 g/L | 507 (80.2) | 325 | 182 | |
< 35 g/L | 125 (19.8) | 2 | 123 | |
PLT | 0.072 | |||
≤ 300 × 109/L | 484 (76.6) | 260 | 224 | |
> 300 × 109/L | 148 (23.4) | 67 | 81 | |
CEA | 0.353 | |||
≤ 5 ng/mL | 547 (86.6) | 287 | 260 | |
> 5 ng/mL | 85 (13.4) | 40 | 45 | |
Histological type | 0.958 | |||
Well | 190 (30.1) | 98 | 92 | |
Poor | 442 (69.9) | 229 | 213 | |
Blood loss | 0.034 | |||
≤ 400 mL | 423 (66.9) | 233 | 190 | |
> 400 mL | 209 (33.1) | 94 | 115 | |
Operative time | 0.883 | |||
≤ 4 h | 253 (40.0) | 130 | 123 | |
> 4 h | 379 (60.0) | 197 | 182 | |
Postoperative chemotherapy | 0.666 | |||
Absent | 237 (37.5) | 120 | 117 | |
Present | 395 (62.5) | 207 | 188 | |
Postoperative complications | 0.488 | |||
Absent | 551 (87.2) | 288 | 263 | |
Present | 81 (12.8) | 39 | 42 | |
Severe complication | 0.045 | |||
Absent | 580 (91.8) | 307 | 273 | |
Present | 52 (8.2) | 20 | 32 |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients
Variable | UnivariateP value | Multivariate | ||
HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Age (yr) | 0.041 | 0.004 | ||
≤ 65 | 1 | |||
> 65 | 2.323 | 1.299-4.156 | ||
Sex | 0.299 | |||
Male | ||||
Female | ||||
Resectability | < 0.001 | 0.018 | ||
R0 | 1 | |||
R1, R2 | 2.062 | 1.133-3.759 | ||
Tumor depth | < 0.001 | |||
T1, T2 | ||||
T3, T4 | ||||
Lymph node | < 0.001 | |||
N0 | ||||
N1-3 | ||||
Distant metastasis | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
M0 | 1 | |||
M1 | 10.505 | 6.540-16.874 | ||
Pathological stage | ||||
I | 1 | |||
II | < 0.001 | 2.552 | 1.591-4.095 | < 0.001 |
III | < 0.001 | 4.695 | 3.053-7.220 | < 0.001 |
IV | < 0.001 | 10.505 | 6.540-16.874 | < 0.001 |
WBC | 0.002 | |||
≤ 11 × 109/L | ||||
> 11 × 109/L | ||||
ALB | < 0.001 | |||
≥ 35 g/L | ||||
< 35 g/L | ||||
PLT | < 0.001 | |||
≤ 300 × 109/L | ||||
> 300 × 109/L | ||||
CEA | < 0.001 | 0.004 | ||
≤ 5 ng/mL | 1 | |||
> 5 ng/mL | 1.457 | 1.126-1.883 | ||
Histological type | < 0.001 | |||
Well | ||||
Poor | ||||
Blood loss | < 0.001 | |||
≤ 400 mL | ||||
> 400 mL | ||||
Operative time | 0.067 | |||
≤ 4 h | ||||
> 4 h | ||||
Postoperative chemotherapy | 0.479 | |||
Absent | ||||
Present | ||||
Postoperative complications | < 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
Absent | 1 | |||
Present | 1.516 | 1.164-1.974 | ||
PNI | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
1 | 1 | |||
2 | 1.668 | 1.368-2.035 | ||
NLR | < 0.001 | 0.656 | ||
1 | 1 | |||
2 | 1.056 | 0.830-1.343 | ||
PLR | < 0.001 | 0.113 | ||
1 | 1 | |||
2 | 1.190 | 0.960-1.475 | ||
Propensity score | 0.398 |
Table 4 Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for survival of gastric patients based on all the derived prognostic scores at the end of follow-up, or after 12, 36, or 60 mo
Item | All survival | 12 mo | 36 mo | 60 mo | ||||
AUC | P value | AUC | P value | AUC | P value | AUC | P value | |
PNI | 0.630 | < 0.001 | 0.602 | < 0.001 | 0.621 | < 0.001 | 0.614 | < 0.001 |
NLR | 0.613 | < 0.001 | 0.593 | < 0.001 | 0.587 | < 0.001 | 0.588 | < 0.001 |
PLR | 0.611 | < 0.001 | 0.580 | 0.002 | 0.592 | < 0.001 | 0.593 | < 0.001 |
PLT | 0.573 | 0.004 | 0.564 | 0.013 | 0.562 | 0.007 | 0.566 | 0.005 |
PNI + NLR | 0.535 | 0.493 | 0.502 | 0.968 | 0.476 | 0.570 | 0.487 | 0.776 |
PNI + PLR | 0.477 | 0.656 | 0.480 | 0.644 | 0.435 | 0.123 | 0.455 | 0.309 |
PNI + PLT | 0.498 | 0.970 | 0.493 | 0.867 | 0.469 | 0.468 | 0.449 | 0.251 |
NLR + PLR | 0.477 | 0.647 | 0.447 | 0.229 | 0.459 | 0.329 | 0.472 | 0.522 |
NLR + PLT | 0.487 | 0.796 | 0.466 | 0.437 | 0.488 | 0.772 | 0.461 | 0.382 |
PLR + PLT | 0.440 | 0.240 | 0.448 | 0.237 | 0.448 | 0.219 | 0.442 | 0.190 |
PNI + NLR + PLR | 0.679 | < 0.001 | 0.638 | < 0.001 | 0.651 | < 0.001 | 0.647 | < 0.001 |
PNI + NLR + PLT | 0.684 | < 0.001 | 0.655 | < 0.001 | 0.657 | < 0.001 | 0.654 | < 0.001 |
PNI + PLR + PLT | 0.668 | < 0.001 | 0.634 | < 0.001 | 0.647 | < 0.001 | 0.646 | < 0.001 |
NLR + PLR + PLT | 0.660 | < 0.001 | 0.627 | < 0.001 | 0.629 | < 0.001 | 0.632 | < 0.001 |
PNI + NLR + PLR + PLT | 0.685 | < 0.001 | 0.647 | < 0.001 | 0.657 | < 0.001 | 0.655 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors including Canton score
Variable | Univariate P value | Multivariate | ||
HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Age (yr) | 0.041 | 0.051 | ||
≤ 65 | 1 | |||
> 65 | 1.238 | 0.999-1.536 | ||
Sex | 0.299 | |||
Male | ||||
Female | ||||
Resectability | < 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
R0 | 1 | |||
R1, R2 | 1.567 | 1.204-2.040 | ||
Tumor depth | < 0.001 | |||
T1, T2 | ||||
T3, T4 | ||||
Lymph node | < 0.001 | |||
N0 | ||||
N1-3 | ||||
Distant metastasis | < 0.001 | |||
M0 | ||||
M1 | ||||
Pathological stage | 0.234 | |||
I, II | ||||
III, IV | < 0.001 | |||
WBC | 0.002 | |||
≤ 11× 109/L | ||||
> 11× 109/L | ||||
ALB | < 0.001 | |||
≥ 35 g/L | ||||
< 35 g/L | ||||
PLT | < 0.001 | 0.795 | ||
≤ 300 × 109/L | ||||
> 300 × 109/L | ||||
CEA | < 0.001 | |||
≤ 5 ng/mL | ||||
> 5 ng/mL | ||||
Histological type | < 0.001 | |||
Well | ||||
Poor | ||||
Blood loss | < 0.001 | 0.407 | ||
≤ 400 mL | ||||
> 400 mL | ||||
Operative time | 0.067 | |||
≤ 4 h | ||||
> 4 h | ||||
Postoperative chemotherapy | 0.479 | |||
Absent | ||||
Present | ||||
Postoperative complications | < 0.001 | |||
Absent | ||||
Present | ||||
PLR | < 0.001 | 0.524 | ||
PLR-L | ||||
PLR-H | ||||
Canton score | ||||
0 | 1 | |||
1 | 0.021 | 1.076 | 0.796-1.454 | 0.633 |
2 | < 0.001 | 1.554 | 1.151-2.097 | 0.004 |
3 | < 0.001 | 1.643 | 1.142-2.364 | 0.007 |
Table 6 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors including Canton score
Variable | UnivariateP value | Multivariate | ||
HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Resectability | < 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
R0 | 1 | |||
R1, R2 | 1.567 | 1.204-2.040 | ||
Canton score | ||||
0 | 1 | |||
1 | 0.021 | 1.076 | 0.796-1.454 | 0.633 |
2 | < 0.001 | 1.554 | 1.151-2.097 | 0.004 |
3 | < 0.001 | 1.643 | 1.142-2.364 | 0.007 |
- Citation: Sun KY, Xu JB, Chen SL, Yuan YJ, Wu H, Peng JJ, Chen CQ, Guo P, Hao YT, He YL. Novel immunological and nutritional-based prognostic index for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5961-5971
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i19/5961.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5961