Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5941-5949
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5941
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5941
Table 1 Demographic characteristic of patients in the study n (%)
| Group | CT-guided ablation(n = 24) | Laparoscopic ablation(n = 27) | P value |
| Age (yr), mean (SD) | 50.0 (14.5) | 49.5 (8.27) | 0.748 |
| Gender (male: female) | 10:14 | 11:16 | 0.947 |
| Co-morbidities | |||
| Gallbladder stones | 0 (0) | 3 (11.1) | 0.238 |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | 2 (8.3) | 3 (10.3) | 1.000 |
| History of open cholecystectomy | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 0.471 |
| Chronic hepatitis B | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 0.471 |
| History of previous liver surgery | 0 (0) | 1 (3.7) | 1.000 |
| Hepatic cysts | 0 (0) | 1 (3.7) | 1.000 |
| Reasons for radiofrequency ablation | |||
| Abdominal discomfort only | 3 (12.5) | 3 (11.1) | 1.000 |
| Enlargement of hemangioma only | 9 (37.5) | 11 (40.7) | 0.813 |
| Abdominal discomfort and enlargement | 12 (50.0) | 13 (48.2) | 0.895 |
| Maximal size of hemangioma, (cm), mean (SD) | 9.6 (2.5) | 9.4 (1.8) | 0.686 |
| Min | 6.0 | 6.5 | |
| Max | 11.5 | 12.0 |
Table 2 Outcome of radiofrequency ablation for hepatic hemangiomas n (%)
| Group | CT-guided ablation(n = 24) | Laparoscopic ablation(n = 27) | P value |
| Technical success rate | 24 (100) | 27 (100) | |
| Complete ablation | 22 (91.7) | 26 (96.3) | 0.595 |
| Time of ablation per lesion (min), mean (SD) | 94.2 (20.4) | 95.4 (18.3) | 0.875 |
| Diameter of ablated zone 1 mo after ablation (cm), mean (SD) | 6.4 (1.3) | 4.4 (1.4) | 0.457 |
| Diameter of ablated zone 6 mo after ablation (cm), mean (SD) | 5.5 (1.4) | 3.7 (1.5) | 0.387 |
Table 3 Thoracic complications of radiofrequency ablation n (%)
| Group | CT-guided ablation(n = 24) | Laparoscopic ablation(n = 27) | P value |
| Total No. of patients with complication | 15 (62.5) | 2 (7.4) | 0.000 |
| Incidence of complication | |||
| Right shoulder pain | 11 (45.8) | 2 (7.4) | 0.003 |
| Transient lung injury | 3 (12.5) | 0 (0) | 0.097 |
| Plural effusion | 5 (20.8) | 0 (0) | 0.018 |
| Diaphragmatic perforation | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 0.471 |
| Hemothorax | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 0.471 |
| Hospital stay, mean (SD) | 9.3 (6.5) | 3.7 (0.9) | 0.032 |
-
Citation: Gao J, Kong J, Ding XM, Ke S, Niu HG, Xin ZH, Ning CM, Guo SG, Li XL, Zhang L, Dong YH, Sun WB. Laparoscopic
vs computerized tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation for large hepatic hemangiomas abutting the diaphragm. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5941-5949 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i19/5941.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5941
