Kang CM, Lee JH. Pathophysiology after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5794-5804 [PMID: 26019443 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5794]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Chang Moo Kang, MD, PhD, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Sinchon-dong Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul 120-752, South Korea. cmkang@yuhs.ac
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Review
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
All control dogs showed characteristic MMC Duodenectomized dog showed non-typical, irregular and non-cyclic pattern of contraction Duodenectomized dog showed low plasma concentration of motilin without cyclical variation
Inter-digestive gastric and small intestinal MMC plasma level of motilin and Polypeptide Y
MMC was abolished in duodenectomized dogs (3 out of 4 dogs) The other dogs showed intermittent cyclic, but markedly abnormal characteristics of gastric contraction Jejunal MMC appeared with short interval Duodenectomy abolished cyclic variation of plasma motilin and polypeptide Y
Phase III contraction, plasma level of insulin, and motilin
Duodenectomy resulted in no phase III contraction in upper GI tract Duodenectomy resulted in no fluctuation of plasma motilin (low level of motilin) Exogenous administration of motilin resulted in comparable response of phased III as shown in control
Trypsin secretion was not coordinated with inter-digestive motility, motilin, and PPY Inter-digestive motility was altered Plasma level of motilin and PPY were reduced, and showed no cyclic pattern
Gastrointestinal contractile activity in the conscious dog, Digestive states: motilin had no influence upon the motor activity Inter-digestive states: had influence upon the motor activity
The effect of exogenous motilin on interdigestive migrating motor complex Plasma motilin levels is one of the factor involved in the production of the activity front of the MMC in man
Cause and effect relationship between plasma motilin levels and migrating myoelectric complexes Endogenous motilin does not initiate spontaneous mmcs MMC contractions release motilin
Table 2 Incidence of delayed gastric emptying according to different gastrointestinal reconstructive methods following pancreaticoduodenectomy
In PPPD Antecolic (n = 125) vs Retrocolic (n = 121)
DGE
No differences in DGE (45 patients (36%) vs 41 (34%), absolute risk difference: 2.1% (95%CI: -9.8-14.0) No differences in need for postoperative nutritional support, other complications, hospital mortality, and median length of hospital stay
In PPPD, antecolic (n = 36) vs retrocolic (n = 28)
DGE
No differences in DGE (17.6% vs 23.1%, P = 0.628) No differences in length of hospital stay [13.0 (10.0-17.5) vs 12.5 (11.0-17.0) days; P = 0.446], time to regular diet [5 (5-7) d vs 5 (4-6) d, P = 0.353], and NG tube requirement [4 (3-7) d vs 3 (3-5) d, P = 0.600]
In PPPD, antecolic (n = 58) vs vertical retrocolic (n = 58)
DGE
No difference in DGE (12.1% vs 20.7%, P = 0.316) At postoperative 6 mo, DGE was accelerated in antecolic group At postoperative 12 mo, better postoperative weight recovery in vertical retrocolic group (93.8% ± 1.2% vs 98.5 % ± 1.3%, P = 0.015)
In PD, Conventional (n = 76) vs Isolated Roux-en-Y (n = 77)
POPF/DGE
No differences in DGE and POPF POPF: conventional (34%) vs isolated Roux-en-Y (33%), P = 0.909 DGE: conventional (12%) vs isolated Roux-en-Y (15%), P = 0.609
In SSPPD, Billroth II (n = 52) vs Roux-en-Y (n = 49)
DGE
Lower DGE in Billroth II: (5.7% vs 30.4%, P = 0.028) Shorter hospital stay in Billroth II (31.6 ± 15.0 d vs 41.4 ± 20.5 d, P = 0.037) Significant association between POPF and DGE (P = 0.037)
In SSPPD, Antecolic (n = 24) vs retrocolic (n = 22)
DGE
Lower incidence of DGE in the antecolic group [20.8% vs 50%, P = 0.0364, especially in the incidence of DGE grade B/C (4.2% vs 27.3%, P = 0.0234)] Significantly shorter time to full resumption of diet in antecolic group No significant difference in other postoperative complications
When CTL/S was equal to or less than 0.9 HU When CTL/S was equal to or less than 0.9 HU
14 (23)
In multivariate analysis,
Pancreatic head cancer (OR = 12.0, P = 0.006)
De novo NAFLD after PD was associated with body weight loss and decreases in serum levels of albumin, cholinesterase, and total cholesterol
After administration of pancreatic enzyme, body weight and serum concentrations of albumin, cholinesterase, and total cholesterol were markedly increased
In addition, hepatic steatosis and serum AST and ALT levels were also significantly improved by treatment
De novo NAFLD after PD was primarily
caused by pancreatic exocrine insufficiency
Citation: Kang CM, Lee JH. Pathophysiology after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5794-5804