Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5794-5804
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5794
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5794
Table 1 Experimental study showing the relationship between motilin and duodenectomy
Ref. | Year | Study design and model | Primary end point | Observations |
Tanaka et al[74] | 1987 | Normal dog vs Duodenectomized dog | Phase III contraction, plasma level of motilin | All control dogs showed characteristic MMC Duodenectomized dog showed non-typical, irregular and non-cyclic pattern of contraction Duodenectomized dog showed low plasma concentration of motilin without cyclical variation |
Tanaka et al[75] | 1988 | Normal dog vs Duodenectomized dog | Inter-digestive gastric and small intestinal MMC plasma level of motilin and Polypeptide Y | MMC was abolished in duodenectomized dogs (3 out of 4 dogs) The other dogs showed intermittent cyclic, but markedly abnormal characteristics of gastric contraction Jejunal MMC appeared with short interval Duodenectomy abolished cyclic variation of plasma motilin and polypeptide Y |
Suzuki et al[76] | 2001 | Conscious dog vs Duodenectomized dog | Phase III contraction, plasma level of insulin, and motilin | Duodenectomy resulted in no phase III contraction in upper GI tract Duodenectomy resulted in no fluctuation of plasma motilin (low level of motilin) Exogenous administration of motilin resulted in comparable response of phased III as shown in control |
Malfertheiner et al[77] | 1989 | Normal dog vs | Pancreatic trypsin | In duodenectomized dog |
Duodenectomized dog | GI motility plasma motilin, PPY | Trypsin secretion was not coordinated with inter-digestive motility, motilin, and PPY Inter-digestive motility was altered Plasma level of motilin and PPY were reduced, and showed no cyclic pattern | ||
Itoh et al[78] | 1976 | Normal dog | GI motility plasma motilin | Gastrointestinal contractile activity in the conscious dog, Digestive states: motilin had no influence upon the motor activity Inter-digestive states: had influence upon the motor activity |
Vantrappen et al[79] | 1979 | Human | GI motility plasma motilin level | The effect of exogenous motilin on interdigestive migrating motor complex Plasma motilin levels is one of the factor involved in the production of the activity front of the MMC in man |
Sarna et al[80] | 1983 | Normal dog | Plasma motilin levels Migrating myoelectric complexes (MMCs) | Cause and effect relationship between plasma motilin levels and migrating myoelectric complexes Endogenous motilin does not initiate spontaneous mmcs MMC contractions release motilin |
Table 2 Incidence of delayed gastric emptying according to different gastrointestinal reconstructive methods following pancreaticoduodenectomy
Ref. | Year | Study design | Primary end point | Observations |
Eshuis et al[81] | 2014 | In PPPD Antecolic (n = 125) vs Retrocolic (n = 121) | DGE | No differences in DGE (45 patients (36%) vs 41 (34%), absolute risk difference: 2.1% (95%CI: -9.8-14.0) No differences in need for postoperative nutritional support, other complications, hospital mortality, and median length of hospital stay |
Tamandl et al[82] | 2014 | In PPPD, antecolic (n = 36) vs retrocolic (n = 28) | DGE | No differences in DGE (17.6% vs 23.1%, P = 0.628) No differences in length of hospital stay [13.0 (10.0-17.5) vs 12.5 (11.0-17.0) days; P = 0.446], time to regular diet [5 (5-7) d vs 5 (4-6) d, P = 0.353], and NG tube requirement [4 (3-7) d vs 3 (3-5) d, P = 0.600] |
Imamura et al[83] | 2014 | In PPPD, antecolic (n = 58) vs vertical retrocolic (n = 58) | DGE | No difference in DGE (12.1% vs 20.7%, P = 0.316) At postoperative 6 mo, DGE was accelerated in antecolic group At postoperative 12 mo, better postoperative weight recovery in vertical retrocolic group (93.8% ± 1.2% vs 98.5 % ± 1.3%, P = 0.015) |
Tani et al[84] | 2014 | In PD, Conventional (n = 76) vs Isolated Roux-en-Y (n = 77) | POPF/DGE | No differences in DGE and POPF POPF: conventional (34%) vs isolated Roux-en-Y (33%), P = 0.909 DGE: conventional (12%) vs isolated Roux-en-Y (15%), P = 0.609 |
Shimoda et al[85] | 2013 | In SSPPD, Billroth II (n = 52) vs Roux-en-Y (n = 49) | DGE | Lower DGE in Billroth II: (5.7% vs 30.4%, P = 0.028) Shorter hospital stay in Billroth II (31.6 ± 15.0 d vs 41.4 ± 20.5 d, P = 0.037) Significant association between POPF and DGE (P = 0.037) |
Ke et al[86] | 2013 | In PD | DGE/POPF | No differences in DGE and POPF |
Continuous loop (n = 109) vs Roux-en-Y (n = 107) | POPF: continuous loop (17.6%) vs Roux-en-Y (15.7%), P > 0.05 DGE: continuous loop (25%) vs Roux-en-Y (23%), P > 0.05 | |||
Gangavatiker et al[87] | 2011 | In conventional PD and PPPD Antecolic (n = 32) vs Retrocolic (n = 36) | DGE | No difference in DGE (34.4% vs 27.8%, P = 0.6) |
Kurahara et al[88] | 2011 | In SSPPD, Antecolic (n = 24) vs retrocolic (n = 22) | DGE | Lower incidence of DGE in the antecolic group [20.8% vs 50%, P = 0.0364, especially in the incidence of DGE grade B/C (4.2% vs 27.3%, P = 0.0234)] Significantly shorter time to full resumption of diet in antecolic group No significant difference in other postoperative complications |
Chijiiwa et al[89] | 2009 | In PPPD, Antecolic (n = 17) vs retrocolic (n = 18) | DGE | No difference in DGE DGE: 6% vs 22%, P = 0.34 |
Table 3 Definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula
Postoperative pancreatic fistula | |||
Grade | A | B | C |
General appearance (clinical condition) | Well | Often Well | Ill appearing, Bad |
Medical or interventional approach | No | Yes or No | Yes |
Postoperative radiologic finding (US/CT) | Negative | Negative or Positive | Positive |
Long-time drainage (≥ 21 d) | No | Usually Yes | Yes |
Reoperation | No | No | Yes |
Mortality related to POPF | No | No | Possibly yes |
Sign of infection | No | Yes | Yes |
Sepsis | No | No | Yes |
Readmission | No | Yes or No | Yes or No |
Table 4 Recent clinical studies about fatty liver after pancreaticoduodenectomy
Ref. | Year | Patient number | Follow-up period | Definitions of NAFLD | Incidence of fatty liver, n (%) | Risk factors/observation |
(mo) | ||||||
Song et al[90] | 2011 | 228 | 16 | When CTS-L was equal to or less than 10 HU When CTL/S was equal to or less than 0.9 HU | 15 (7.8) | In multivariate analysis, Pancreatic fistula (HR = 3.332, P = 0.037) External pancreatic duct stent (HR = 4.530, P = 0.017) |
Sato et al[91] | 2014 | 110 | 6 | Hepatic CT value of less than 40 HU | 44 (40) | In multivariate analysis, |
Younger age (OR = 1.079, P = 0.002), Female (OR = 6.102, P < 0.001) | ||||||
Small remnant pancreatic volume (< 10 mL), OR = 4.109, P = 0.009 | ||||||
Suspicion infection on POD7-28 (OR = 3.109, P = 0.027) | ||||||
Kato et al[92] | 2010 | 54 | 7.7 ± 2.1 | Hepatic CT value of less than 40 HU a | 20 (37.0) | In multivariate analysis, |
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05) | ||||||
Pancreatic resection line (left side of SMA, SMA/PV) (P < 0.01) | ||||||
Diarrhea (P < 0.05) | ||||||
Nagai et al[71] | 2014 | 361 | 6 | When CTL/S was equal to or less than 0.9 HU | 30 (8.3) | In patients with NAFLD, CTL/S ratio was significantly improved by pancrelipase treatment |
Nutritional status by total protein, albumin, and cholesterol was significantly improved by pancrelipase treatment | ||||||
Severe diarrhea was improved | ||||||
Malnutrition after PD might be cause for postoperative NAFLD | ||||||
Ito et al[93] | 2014 | 100 | NA | When CTL/S was equal to or less than 0.9 HU | 12 (12) | In multivariate analysis, Blood loss (HR = 1.001, P = 0.016) |
Nakagawa et al[94] | 2014 | 104 | Median 7.7 (2.5-23.6) | When CTS-L was equal to or less than 10 HU | 26 (25) | In multivariate analysis, Postoperative pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (HR = 4.16, P = 0.02) |
Tanaka et al[72] | 2011 | 60 | 12 | When CTL/S was equal to or less than 0.9 HU When CTL/S was equal to or less than 0.9 HU | 14 (23) | In multivariate analysis, |
Pancreatic head cancer (OR = 12.0, P = 0.006) | ||||||
De novo NAFLD after PD was associated with body weight loss and decreases in serum levels of albumin, cholinesterase, and total cholesterol | ||||||
After administration of pancreatic enzyme, body weight and serum concentrations of albumin, cholinesterase, and total cholesterol were markedly increased | ||||||
In addition, hepatic steatosis and serum AST and ALT levels were also significantly improved by treatment | ||||||
De novo NAFLD after PD was primarily | ||||||
caused by pancreatic exocrine insufficiency |
- Citation: Kang CM, Lee JH. Pathophysiology after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5794-5804
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i19/5794.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5794