Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2015; 21(17): 5407-5416
Published online May 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5407
Table 1 Characteristics of the selected studies in our systematic review
Ref.LocationStudy design and type of interventionDM patients,n (HP+/HP-)1Diagnosis ofH. pyloriParameter(s) measuredGlycemic control(HP+ vs HP-)Quality score2
de Luis et al[43], 2000
Spain
Observational;
13 (13/13)
UBT and serologic test
HbA1c
ND
9
before and after eradication (6-mo-follow-up)
Arslan et al[28], 2000
Turkey
Observational;
88 (49/39)
Serologic test
HbA1c
ND
8
HP+ vs HP-
Ko et al[29], 2001
Hong Kong, China
Observational;
63 (32/31)
RUT
HbA1c and FPG
ND
9
HP+ vs HP-
Jones et al[30], 2002
Australia
Observational;
63 (15/48)
Serologic test
HbA1c
ND
9
HP+ vs HP-
Ojetti et al[18], 2002
Italy
Observational;
34 (13/21)
UBT and histology
HbA1c
Worse
7
reinfected vs not reinfected (1-yr-follow-up)
Candelli et al[31], 2003
Italy
Observational;
121 (34/87)
UBT and serologic test
HbA1c
ND
8
HP+ vs HP-
Wang et al[32], 2003
China
Observational;
94 (75/19)
Serologic test
HbA1c and FPG
ND
8
HP+ vs HP-
Candelli et al[33], 2004
Italy
Observational;
58 (29/29)
UBT
HbA1c
ND
8
HP+ vs HP-
before and after eradication (6-mo-follow-up)
Agrawal et al[38], 2005
India
Observational;
80 (50/30)
RUT
FPG
Worse
8
HP+ vs HP-
Moghimi et al[41], 2007
Iran
RCT
41 (22/19)
UBT
HbA1c decrease and FPG decrease
ND
3 (Jadad score)
eradication vs non-eradication (3-mo-follow-up)
Ojetti et al[19], 2007
Italy
Observational;
40 (11/29)
UBT and histology
HbA1c
Worse
7
reinfected vs not reinfected (5-yr-follow-up)
Toporowska-Kowalska et al[34], 2007
Poland
Observational;
198 (48/150)
UBT
HbA1c
Worse
7
HP+ vs HP-
Khalil et al[44], 2007
Belgium
Observational;
100 (49/51)
UBT
HbA1C
ND
7
before and after eradication (12-mo-follow-up)
Demir et al[35], 2008
Turkey
Observational;
141 (87/54)
RUT and histology
HbA1c and FPG
ND
9
HP+ vs HP-
Lu et al[40], 2010
China
Observational;
80 (49/31)
UBT and histology
Insulin and C-peptide
Worse
8
HP+ vs HP-
Candelli et al[17], 2012
Italy
Observational;
69 (17/52)
UBT
HbA1c
ND
8
HP+ vs HP-
Wei[39], 2012
China
Observational;
68 (38/30)
RUT
FPG
Worse
7
HP+ vs HP-
Zhou et al[36], 2012
China
Observational;
180 (84/96)
Serologic test
HbA1c, insulin and C-peptide
ND
8
HP+ vs HP-
Vafaeimanesh et al[42], 2013
Iran
RCT;
93 (46/47)
UBT
HbA1c decrease and FPG decrease
ND
3 (Jadad score)
eradication vs noneradication (6-mo-follow-up)
Peng et al[37], 2013
China
Observational;
85 (43/42)
RUT and histology
HbA1c and FPG
Worse
7
HP+ vs HP-
Wada et al[45], 2013JapanObservational;
72 (72/72)UBT and histologyHbA1cND7
before and after eradication (6-mo-follow-up)
Table 2 Population information of the selected studies
Ref.DM typeAge (yr)Sex (M/F, n)DM duration (yr)Type of therapy for DMGI symptoms, n
de Luis et al[43], 2000T1DM44.9 ± 15.54/913.49 ± 7.0Insulin10 with dyspepsia
(1-33)
Arslan et al[28], 2000T1DM12.6 ± 4.236/52HP+: 3.85 ± 3.62;Insulin5 had upper GI symptoms
HP-: 2.30 ± 2.12 (P = 0.02)1
(0-13)
Ko et al[29], 2001T2DM49.9 ± 12.029/34HP+: 5.2 ± 5.7;Irrespective29 had upper GI symptoms
HP-: 7.3 ± 6.6 (NS)
(1-26; median: 3)
Jones et al[30], 2002T1DM and T2DM44.7 ± 2.9925/3816.6 ± 1.4Insulin; oral drugsGI symptoms occurred frequently
Ojetti et al[18], 2002T1DM42 ± 918/16NAInsulinNone had GI symptoms
Candelli et al[31], 2003T1DM15 ± 665/566.6 ± 4.6InsulinA proportion had GI symptoms
Wang et al[32], 2003T2DM(28-83)44/50HP+: 5.8 ± 2.2;Insulin and oral drugsA proportion had GI symptoms2
HP-: 9.3 ± 6.5 (P < 0.05)1
Candelli et al[33], 2004T1DM13.35 ± 3.6228/30NAInsulin35 had GI symptoms
Agrawal et al[38], 2005T2DM52.8 ± 11.162/18NANA36 had GI symptoms
Moghimi et al[41], 2007T2DMNANANo difference in two groupsInsulin and oral drugsNA
Ojetti et al[19], 2007T1DM48 ± 923/1727.5 ± 12.5InsulinNA
Toporowska-Kowalska et al[34], 2007T1DM14.38 ± 3.75NA(0.5-16)InsulinNA
Khalil et al[44], 2007T1DM14.2 ± 2.856/446.2 ± 2.3Insulin45 had vague abdominal pain
Demir et al[35], 2008T2DM52.0 ± 8.244/976.1 ± 5.9Insulin, oral drugs or diet aloneAll had GI symptoms
HP+: 5.9 ± 6.1;
HP-: 6.28 ± 5.9 (NS)
Lu et al[40], 2010T1DM18.6 ± 10.645/35No difference in two groupsInsulinNA
Candelli et al[17], 2012T1DM16.8 ± NA (9-21)41/28NAInsulinA proportion had GI symptoms
Wei[39], 2012T2DM50.0 ± 11.236/32NANANA
Zhou et al[36], 2012T2DM59.22 ± 2.5787/93NANANA
Vafaeimanesh et al[42], 2013T2DM55.3 ± 10.450/43NANon-insulin usersA proportion had GI symptoms
Peng et al[37], 2013T2DM50.1 ± 10.351/34No difference in two groupsNANA
Wada et al[45], 2013T2DM63.7 ± 1.155/17NANANA
Table 3 Glycosylated hemoglobin levels in Helicobacter pylori-positive diabetics before and after eradication treatment
Ref.Eradication regimenBefore treatmentAfter treatment
P value
3 mo6 mo12 mo
de Luis et al[43], 2000A: 2000 mg, C: 1000 mg, O: 40 mg; 10 d7.7 ± 1.4NA7.3 ± 1.0NA> 0.05
Candelli et al[33], 2004< 14 yr: A: 50 mg/kg, C: 30 mg/kg, R: 2 mg/kg; 7 d8.2 ± 1.0NA8.3 ± 1.0NA> 0.05
> 14 yr: A: 2000 mg, C: 750 mg, R: 20 mg; 7 d
Khalil et al[44], 2007Two antibiotics among A, C or M; O; 7 d7.4 ± 1.3NANA7.9 ± 1.1> 0.05
Wada et al[45], 2013A: 1500 mg, C: 800 mg, L: 60 mg or O: 40 mg or R: 40 mg; 7 d6.9 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.1NA> 0.05