Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2015; 21(10): 2982-2987
Published online Mar 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.2982
Published online Mar 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.2982
Table 1 Summary of clinicopathologic features and treatment outcome in 15 patients underwent endoscopic resection using band ligation for esophageal submucosal layer tumor
No. | Gender | Age (yr) | Pathology | Symptoms | Location | Procedure time (min) | Complication | Minor complication | Size (mm) | En bloc resection | Margin status | Follow-up (mo) | Outcomes |
1 | M | 54 | GCP | None | Middle | 10 | No | Chest pain | 8 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (+) | 64 | No recur |
2 | F | 52 | GCP | None | Upper | 4 | No | No | 7 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 46 | No recur |
3 | M | 44 | GCP | Reflux | Lower | 7 | No | No | 8 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 41 | No recur |
4 | M | 52 | Lipoma | None | Lower | 17 | No | No | 7 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 41 | No recur |
5 | F | 31 | Leiomyoma | None | Upper | 7 | No | Hot burn | 13 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 25 | No recur |
6 | M | 46 | GCP | Heartburn | Middle | 10 | No | Chest pain | 7 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 20 | No recur |
7 | M | 57 | GCP | None | Lower | 8 | No | Chest pain | 7 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 17 | No recur |
8 | F | 42 | GCP | Epigastric pain | Upper | 8 | No | No | 2 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 17 | No recur |
9 | F | 46 | GCP | None | Upper | 10 | No | No | 9 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 12 | No recur |
10 | M | 58 | GCP | Epigastric pain | Middle | 15 | No | No | 4 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 5 | No recur |
11 | F | 48 | GCP | Globus | Lower | 9 | No | No | 12 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 43 | No recur |
12 | F | 44 | Leiomyoma | None | Middle | 5 | No | No | 6 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 43 | No recur |
13 | F | 70 | Leiomyoma | None | Middle | 5 | No | No | 7 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 45 | No recur |
14 | F | 46 | GCP | None | Lower | 12 | No | No | 1 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 12 | No recur |
15 | F | 65 | Leiomyoma | None | Upper | 6 | No | Hot burn | 6 | Yes | LM (-)/VM (-) | 45 | No recur |
Table 2 Characteristics of patients and tumors n (%)
Characteristics | Values |
Age, yr (mean ± SD) | 50.3 ± 9.67 |
Sex, male | 6 (40) |
Tumor location | |
Upper esophagus | 5 (33.3) |
Middle esophagus | 5 (33.3) |
Lower esophagus | 5 (33.3) |
Tumor size, mm (mean ± SD) | 6.93 ± 3.15 |
Tumor size, mm | |
> 10 | 2 (13.3) |
5-10 | 10 (66.6) |
< 5 | 3 (20.0) |
Table 3 Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection using band ligation n (%)
Characteristics | Values |
Endoscopic complete resection | 15 (100) |
pathologic complete resection | 14 (93.3) |
Lateral margin | 15 (100) |
Vertical margin | 14 (93.3) |
Procedure time, min (mean ± SD) | 8.86 ± 3.66 |
Major complication | |
bleeding | 0 (0) |
perforation | 0 (0) |
Minor complication | |
Hot burn | 2 (13.3) |
Chest pain | 3 (20.0) |
Recurrence on follow up | 0 (0) |
Pathologic outcomes | |
Granular cell tumor | 10 (66.6) |
Leiomyoma | 4 (16.6) |
Lipoma | 1 (6.6) |
- Citation: Hong JB, Choi CW, Kim HW, Kang DH, Park SB, Kim SJ, Kim DJ. Endoscopic resection using band ligation for esophageal SMT in less than 10 mm. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(10): 2982-2987
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i10/2982.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.2982