Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2015; 21(1): 12-20
Published online Jan 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.12
Published online Jan 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.12
Table 1 Published articles on ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract
Ref. | No. Patients | Follow-up (wk) | Healing rate | Complications | Type of study |
Rojanasakul et al[23] | 18 | 4 | 94% | NR | Prospective observational |
Shanwani et al[26] | 45 | 7 | 82% | NR | Prospective observational |
Ellis et al[27] | 31 | 6 | 94% | NR | Retrospective |
Bleier et al[28] | 39 | 10 | 57% | 1 Anal fissure; | Retrospective |
1 Persistent pain | |||||
Ooi et al[29] | 25 | 6 | 96% | NR | Prospective observational |
Tan et al[30] | 93 | 4 | 92% | NR | Retrospective review |
Steiner et al[31] | 18 | 6 | 83% | 1 hemorrhoidal thrombosis | Retrospective |
Aboulian et al[32] | 25 | 24 | 68% | 2 Vaginal fungal infection | Retrospective review |
Mushaya et al[33] | 25 | 4 | 68% | 1 Secondary bleeding; | Prospective randomized |
2 Superficial perineal wound dehiscence | |||||
Abcarian et al[34] | 50 | 15 | 74% | NR | Retrospective |
Lo et al[35] | 25 | 2 | 98% | NR | Retrospective |
van Onkelen et al[36] | 42 | 12 | 51% | NR | Prospective |
Chen et al[37] | 10 | 6 | 100% | NR | Retrospective |
Lehmann et al[38] | 17 | 4 | 47% | 1 perianal haematoma; | Prospective |
1 wound infection | |||||
Liu et al[39] | 38 | 26 | 61% | NR | Retrospective |
Table 2 Published studies on anal fistula plug
Ref. | Type of study | No. Patients | Success rate | Follow-up (mo) |
Johnson et al[41] | Prospective | 15 | 87% | 7 |
Non-randomized | ||||
Controlled trial | ||||
Champagne et al[44] | Prospective | 46 | 83% | 12 |
O’Connor et al[45] | Prospective | 20 (Crohn’s) | 80% | 10 |
Van Koperen et al[46] | Prospective | 17 | 42% | 7 |
Ellis[47] | Retrospective | 18 (5 rectovaginal) | 88% | 6 |
Lawes et al[48] | Retrospective | 17 plug | 66% | 7.4 |
3 pug+flap | ||||
Ky et al[49] | Prospective | 44 plug+flap | 54.6% | 6.5 |
Schwandner et al[50] | Prospective | 19 (7 Crohn’s) | 61% overall | 9 |
45.5% cryptoglandular | ||||
85.7% Crohn’s | ||||
Garg[51] | Prospective | 21 | 71% | 10 |
Christoforidis et al[52] | Retrospective | 47 | 43% | 6.5 |
Thekkinkattil et al[53] | Prospective | 43 | 44% | 11 |
Safar et al[54] | Retrospective | 35 | 14% | 4 |
Ortiz et al[55] | Prospective Randomized trial | 31 cryptoglandular: -15 plug -16 endorectal-advancement flap (EAF) | 20% (plug group) 87.5% (EAF) | 12 |
El-Gazzaz et al[56] | Retrospective | 33 | 25% | 7.4 |
Chan et al[57] | Prospective | 44 | 50% | 10.5 |
Cintron et al[58] | Prospective | 73 | 42.5% | 15 |
Table 3 Published studies on GORE BioA fistula plug
Ref. | Study design | No. patients | Aetiology and classification | Healing-rate | Follow-up (mo) | Complications |
Buchberg et al[61] | Retrospective | 10 | 6 cryptoglandular | 54% | 2 | NR |
Case-series | 3 iatrogenic | |||||
1 HIV | ||||||
de la Portilla et al[62] | Prospective | 19 | 10 high- transphincteric | 16% | 12 | 1 Acute sepsis |
Case-series | 9 low transphicteric | 1 Urge incontinence | ||||
1 Plug extrusion | ||||||
Ratto et al[63] | Prospective | 11 | 11 High- | 73% | 5 | NR |
Case-series | transphincteric | |||||
Ommer et al[64] | Retrospective | 40 | 28 High-transphincteric | 57.5% | 12 | 1 Plug extrusion |
Case-series | 12 Suprasphincteric | 1 abscess | ||||
4 Crohn’s | 1 Dehiscence |
- Citation: Limura E, Giordano P. Modern management of anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(1): 12-20
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i1/12.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.12