Brief Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2014; 20(5): 1340-1347
Published online Feb 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1340
Table 1 Characteristics of the 72 patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma of T1a or T1b stage n (%)
CharacteristicsData
Age (yr)
≤ 58136 (50)
> 5836 (50)
Sex
M47 (65.3)
F25 (34.7)
T1 stage
T1a35 (48.61)
T1b37 (51.39)
Differentiation
Carcinoma in situ26 (36.11)
Well6 (8.33)
Moderately30 (41.67)
Poorly10 (13.89)
Site of neoplasm
Upper third9 (12.50)
Mid third52 (72.22)
Lower third211 (15.28)
Table 2 Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for staging T1a or T1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
PathologyExpert 1
Expert 2
Common results
T1a (n = 36)T1b (n = 36)T1a (n = 39)T1b (n = 33)T1a (n = 36)
T1a (n = 35)2313251026
T1b (n = 37)1324142310
Group
AC65.30%66.70%70.80%
SE65.70%64.10%74.30%
FPR35.10%35.90%27.00%
FNR34.30%30.30%25.70%
SP64.90%69.70%73.00%
PPV63.90%71.40%72.20%
NPV66.70%62.20%75.00%
AUC0.6530.6680.736
P value0.0260.0140.001
Table 3 Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for staging T1a or T1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in relation to tumor location
Site of neoplasmExpert 1
Expert 2
Common results
T1aT1bT1aT1bT1aT1b
Upper thirdT1a424241
T1b121213
Mid thirdT1a14101611178
T1b919718621
Lower thirdT1a515151
T1b232323
Group
ACUpper third66.7%66.7%77.8%
Mid third63.50%65.40%73.10%
Lower third72.70%72.70%72.70%
SEUpper third66.70%66.70%80.00%
Mid third58.30%59.30%68.00%
Lower third83.30%83.30%83.30%
FPRUpper third66.70%66.70%75.00%
Mid third67.90%72.00%77.80%
Lower third60.00%60.00%60.00%
FNRUpper third80.00%80.00%80.00%
Mid third60.90%69.60%73.90%
Lower third71.40%71.40%71.40%
SPUpper third50.00%50.00%75.30%
Mid third65.50%62.10%72.40%
Lower third75.00%75.00%75.00%
Table 4 Cox multivariate analyses of factors affecting diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for staging T1a or T1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
CharacteristicsHazards ratioP value
Age ( ≤ 58 vs > 58 yr)1.2400.269
Sex (male vs female)0.9230.340
Tumor width, cm ( ≤ 2 vs > 2)1.4070.240
Tumor length, cm ( ≤ 2 vs > 2)4.9840.0291
Differentiation (well-moderate vs poor)2.8150.098