Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2014; 20(43): 16037-16052
Published online Nov 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16037
Published online Nov 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16037
Table 1 Risk factors and causes of reactivation of chronic hepatitis B
Causes of HBV reactivation | Risk factors |
Male sex | |
Cancer chemotherapy | Genotypes B and D |
Immunosuppressants | Pre-core and core promoter mutations |
Corticosteroid withdrawal | Elevated ALT at presentation |
Interferon therapy | |
Hepatitis A/E virus superinfection | |
Hepatitis C virus superinfection | |
Hepatitis delta virus superinfection/co-infection | |
Interaction with HIV infection | |
Effect of immune reconstitution therapy |
Table 2 Factors to differentiate severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B from acute hepatitis B
Parameters | AVH-B | HBV-R | |
IgM anti-HBc | > 600 Paul Ehrlich units/mL | Yes | Yes |
(7 s and 8 s forms) | (19 s form) | ||
> 1:1000 titer | Yes | No | |
HBV DNA | > 2.25 × 104/mL | No | Yes |
(121 000 copies/mL) | |||
Liver biopsy: evidence of chronic hepatitis such as lymphocytic portal inflammation with interface hepatitis, spotty lobular inflammation, portal expansion, periportal fibrous strands, bridging fibrosis, and/or cirrhosis | No | Yes | |
Basal core promoter mutation | No | Yes | |
Pre-core stop codon mutation | No | Yes |
Table 3 Independent prognostic factors for mortality (and liver transplantation) in severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B[22]
Parameters | Chan et al[40] 2002, J Viral Hepatol | Yuen et al[19] 2003, Clin Infect Dis | Chien et al[49] 2003, J Hepatol | Tsubota et al[45] 2005, J Gastroenterol Hepatol | Kumar et al[38] 2006, Dig Dis Sci |
Age | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Sex | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Albumin | N/A | N/A | Low | N/A | N/A |
Bilirubin | High | High | High | High | High |
Prothrombin Time | N/A | Prolonged | Prolonged | Prolonged | Prolonged |
ALT | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | High |
Platelet count | Low | Low | Low | N/A | Not studied |
HBeAg | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | High |
HBV DNA | Not studied | N/A | N/A | N/A | High |
Creatinine | N/A | N/A | N/A | Not studied | Not studied |
AFP | Not studied | N/A | N/A | N/A | Not studied |
Cirrhosis | Not studied | Present | N/A | Present | Not studied |
Ascites | Not studied | Not studied | Present | N/A | Not studied |
CTP | Not studied | Not studied | High | High | Not studied |
Table 4 Studies that have provided long-term data on lamivudine treatment for severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B
Characteristics | Chan et al[40] 2002, J Viral Heapt | Wong et al[25] 2009, J Gastroenterol Hepatol | Tsubota et al[45] 2005, J Gastroenterol Hepatol | Kumar et al[38] 2006, Dig Dis Sci |
Location | Hong Kong | Hong Kong | Japan | India |
Follow up | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 1.5 |
(median, yr) | ||||
ALT (median, IU/L) | 1758 | 1325 | 816 | 1658 |
Bilirubin (median, mg/dL) | 31.6 | 19.6 | 14.4 | 10.1 |
PT/INR (median) | 1.63 | 1.60 | 1.58 | 2.0 |
HBeAg +ve (%) | 0 | 100 | 70 | 83 |
HBV DNA (median, log copies/mL) | 6.76 | 8.08 | 8.69 | 5.135 |
SVR | 21/26 | 21/29 | 18/21 | 21/31 |
Study | Patient No. | Drug used (no. of patients treated) | Clinical implications | Salient features | Conclusion |
Chen et al[53] | 55 | Entecavir | ALT, albumin, bilirubin, PT; no significant change between groups | No difference in mortality rates below 3 mo and after 3 mo, MELD not affected between groups | Short-term suppression of HBV replication offers no benefit on survival |
Wong et al[56] | 124 | Entecavir | Treatment achieved | Tongji prognostic predictor model is better than MELD in prognostication in HBV-ACLF | Entecavir prevents disease progression and increases the |
< 3 logs HBV DNA; significantly higher survival rate; prevention of liver or renal dysfunction | survival of patients with HBV-ACLF | ||||
Shouval et al[61] | 36 vs 117 | Entecavir (36); Lamivudine (117) | Prolonged jaundice, encephalopathy, ascites in Entecavir group | More liver-related mortality in entecavir group, faster virological response | Short-term mortality high in entecavir group, but faster reduction in viral load |
Cui et al[58] | 33/34/37 | Entecavir (33); lamivudine (34); placebo (37) | Liver function and MELD scores did not improve significantly | No significant difference in 3-mo survival was observed, levels of HBV DNA and rates of recurrence of HBV-associated ACLF were lower | Nucleoside analog treatment did not improve the short-term prognosis of patients with HBV-associated ACLF although it was efficacious and safe in the management of HBV DNA levels |
Imamura et al[20] | 34 | Entecavir and lamivudine consecutively | No reduction of < 1 log IU/mL in HBV DNA after 1 or 3 mo of treatment. Initial virological response, with lamivudine and entecavir, respectively, was 83.3% and 100% | Twelve months after treatment, 41.6% of 24 lamivudine group patients switched to another drug or added adefovir to their treatment due to the emergence of lamivudine-resistant mutants | Entecavir appears to be as effective as lamivudine in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B |
Table 6 Important studies on antiviral therapy in hepatitis-B-related acute on chronic liver failure
Ref. | Country | Study design | Drugs/dose | No of patients treated | End events | Follow up | Remarks |
Yang et al[79] | China | RCT | Entecavir (0.5 mg) | 55 | Liver function, HBV DNA | 1 mo | Useful |
Sun et al[50] | China | Retrospective cohort | LAM (100 mg) | 130 | Mortality, DNA, YMDD mutation | 3 mo | Not useful |
Qiu et al[80] | China | RCT | Telbivudine (600 mg) | 30 | Liver function, HBV DNA | 1 mo | Useful |
Cui et al[58] | China | Retrospective cohort | LAM (100 mg) or EVT (0.5 mg) | 67 (LAM) vs EVT (37) | Mortality, MELD, HBV DNA, recurrence | 12 mo | Similar |
Zhang et al[72] | China | Observational study | LAM (100 mg) plus Dexamethasone (10 mg/d, 5 d) | 56 | Liver function, MELD, Survival | 1 mo | Useful |
Garg et al[62] | India | RCT | Tenofovir (300 mg) vs placebo | 14 vs 27 | Mortality, MELD, HBV DNA | 3 mo | Useful |
Chen et al[60] | China | Retrospective cohort | LAM (100 mg) or EVT (0.5 mg) | 72 (LAM) vs 34 (EVT) | Mortality, recurrence, HBV DNA, YMDD mutation | 7 mo | Similar |
Chen et al[47] | China | RCT | LAM (100 mg) or EVT (0.5 mg) | 42(EVT) vs 30(LAM) | HBV DNA, YMDD mutation, MELD Na | 7 mo | Evt more useful |
Qin et al[81] | China | RCT | Telbivudine (600 mg) | 12 | Mortality, liver function, HBV DNA | 3 mo | Useful in renal dysfunction |
Lai et al[54] | China | RCT | LAM (100 mg) or EVT (0.5 mg) | 93(EVT) vs 89(LAM) | HBV DNA, MELD, HBeAg -ve | 3 mo | Evt useful |
Chen et al[82] | China | RCT | Entecavir (0.5 mg) plus Dexamethasone (10 mg/d, 3 d) | 31 | Liver function, MELD, Mortality | 3 mo | Useful |
- Citation: Philips CA, Sarin SK. Potent antiviral therapy improves survival in acute on chronic liver failure due to hepatitis B virus reactivation. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(43): 16037-16052
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i43/16037.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16037