Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2014; 20(4): 899-907
Published online Jan 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.899
Published online Jan 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.899
Table 1 Prognostic scores/health assessments
Score | Risk category | Factors |
“Kohne” score[13] | Low risk | ECOG 0/1 and only one tumour site |
Intermediate risk | ECOG 0/1, ALP < 300 U/L and more than one tumour site or ECOG > 1 and WBC < 1 × 1010/L and only one tumour site | |
High risk | ECOG 0/1 and more than one tumour site and ALP ≥ 300 U/L or ECOG > 1 and more than one tumour site or ECOG > 1 and WBC > 1 × 1010/L | |
FOCUS 2[15] | Comprehensive health assessment at baseline limited health Assessment during course of treatment (excluding MMSE and CCI) | Weight change Timed 20 metre walk MMSE CCI Patient completed questionnaire (social activity, physical fitness, symptoms, overall quality of life and depression) |
Table 2 European Society for Medical Oncology clinical groups for first line treatment stratification[10]
ESMO group | Clinical presentation | Treatment aim | Treatment intensity |
0 | Clearly R0-resectable liver and/or lung metastases | Decrease risk of or delay relapse | FOLFOX |
1 | Liver and/or lung metastases only which:Might become resectable after induction chemotherapy | Maximum tumour shrinkage | Three or four drug combination |
2 | Multiple metastases/sites, with:Rapid progression and/orTumour-related symptoms/risk of rapid deterioration | Immediate clinically relevant response or at least tumour control | Three or four drug combination |
3 | Multiple metastases/sites without option for resection and no major symptoms or severe comorbidity | Abrogation of further progressionTumour shrinkage less relevantLow toxicity essential | Consider sequential approach: start withSingle agent, orDoublet with low toxicity |
Table 3 Available treatment regimens for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer
Treatment intensity | Molecular factor | Regimens |
Single agent | 5FU/LVCapecitabin | |
Two-drug | Capecitabin/bevacizumab | |
FOLFOX/XELOXFOLFIRI/XELIRI | ||
Three-drug | RAS wt | FOLFOX + panitumumabFOLFIRI + cetuximab |
Independent of RAS status | FOLFOX/XELOX + bevacizumabFOLFIRI/XELIRI + bevacizumabFOLFOXIRI | |
Four-drug | FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab |
Table 4 Efficacy and tolerability of three to four drug first line regimen
Regimen | Efficacy | Tolerability | |||||
PFS | OS | Grade 3/4 AE | SAE | Fatal AEs | |||
RAS wt | RAS mut | RAS wt | RAS mut | ||||
FOLFOX + panitumumab[25] | 10.1 | 7.31 | 25.8 | 15.51 | 84% | 40% | 5% |
FOLFIRI + cetuximab[4,62] | 10.59.9 (KRAS exon 2) | NR1 | 33.123.5 (KRAS exon 2) | NR1 | 71%-79% | 26% | NR |
FOLFOX/XELOX + bevacizumab[56] | 9.4 | 21.3 | 80% | NR | 2% | ||
FOLFIRI + bevacizumab[7,62] | 10.4 | NR | 25.9 | NR | NR | 20% | 3.5% |
9.7 | 25.8 | ||||||
FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab[7] | 12.1 | 31.0 | NR | 20% | 2.8% |
- Citation: Stein A, Bokemeyer C. How to select the optimal treatment for first line metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(4): 899-907
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i4/899.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.899