Zhao JM, Wu LY, Liu HR, Hu HY, Wang JY, Huang RJ, Shi Y, Tao SP, Gao Q, Zhou CL, Qi L, Ma XP, Wu HG. Factorial study of moxibustion in treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(37): 13563-13572 [PMID: 25309087 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13563]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Huan-Gan Wu, PhD, Key Laboratory of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Immunology, Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian, No.650 South Wanping Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China. wuhuangan@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Integrative & Complementary Medicine
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Comparisons of the degrees of improvement in symptoms and relevant scales for patients in each group at different stages of treatment
Frequency
P value
Scale
n
Cone
Three treatments/wk
Six treatments/wk
Cone
Frequency
Conefrequency
Birmingham
40
1
42.24 ± 36.12
35.20 ± 23.84
0.643
0.845
0.254
40
2
30.30 ± 77.95
40.25 ± 29.15
IBS-QOL
40
1
17.40 ± 19.04
20.25 ± 14.37
0.255
0.847
0.348
40
2
22.63 ± 15.67
20.76 ± 13.83
SDS
40
1
17.99 ± 17.02
10.49 ± 9.66
0.734
0.133
0.140
1st course
40
2
15.13 ± 19.32
15.06 ± 15.81
SAS
40
1
13.72 ± 13.53
11.96 ± 9.97
0.279
0.535
0.849
40
2
15.65 ± 13.50
14.72 ± 16.67
HAMD
40
1
27.69 ± 48.61
39.54 ± 32.69
0.347
0.071
0.987
40
2
33.78 ± 40.44
45.84 ± 42.93
HAMA
40
1
12.04 ± 65.36
46.90 ± 28.61
0.458
0.011
0.028
40
2
33.62 ± 44.65
36.19 ± 37.95
Birmingham
40
1
73.74 ± 19.43
56.19 ± 21.62
0.393
0.002
0.078
40
2
70.46 ± 27.24
65.56 ± 20.91
IBS-QOL
40
1
29.98 ± 16.59
34.26 ± 13.63
0.247
0.208
0.562
40
2
34.02 ± 15.29
35.60 ± 12.88
SDS
40
1
26.12 ± 16.15
21.65 ± 14.35
0.149
0.373
0.373
2nd course
40
2
27.51 ± 17.52
27.51 ± 15.12
SAS
40
1
23.68 ± 12.83
22.54 ± 12.14
0.871
0.604
0.996
40
2
24.02 ± 15.77
22.90 ± 13.81
HAMD
40
1
63.06 ± 36.74
68.88 ± 32.05
0.139
0.182
0.845
40
2
69.63 ± 30.35
77.45 ± 29.05
HAMA
40
1
49.62 ± 46.44
62.61 ± 38.66
0.502
0.238
0.450
40
2
59.19 ± 49.29
62.04 ± 32.62
Table 4 Correlation analysis of the degrees of improvements in relevant scales and the degrees of symptom improvement
Group
n
Degrees of symptom improvement(Birmingham)
Degrees of improvements inrelevant scales
r
P value
Aconite cake-separated moxibustion groups
160
66.49 ± 23.25
IBS-QOL
33.46 ± 14.68
0.080
0.317
SDS
25.70 ± 15.87
0.165
0.037
SAS
23.28 ± 13.59
0.161
0.042
HAMD
69.75 ± 32.28
0.088
0.276
HAMA
58.36 ± 42.19
0.331
0.077
Citation: Zhao JM, Wu LY, Liu HR, Hu HY, Wang JY, Huang RJ, Shi Y, Tao SP, Gao Q, Zhou CL, Qi L, Ma XP, Wu HG. Factorial study of moxibustion in treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(37): 13563-13572