Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2014; 20(37): 13563-13572
Published online Oct 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13563
Table 1 An analysis of the general baseline conditions of the patients in each group
Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4P value
n40404040
Age (yr)5546.551.5520.196
Gender0.330
Male42.5%45%42.5%45%
Female57.5%55%57.5%55%
Disease duration (yr)35450.300
Disease severity scores231.7 ± 68.0221.5 ± 79.2233.3 ± 73.9241.5 ± 79.30.698
Table 2 Comparisons of the symptom scores for patients in each group at different stages of treatment
GroupnBirminghamIBS-QOLSDSSASHAMDHAMA
Group 140Before21.10 ± 8.6275.75 ± 21.7245.33 ± 11.0442.83 ± 9.626.13 ± 5.435.90 ± 5.22
1st course11.60 ± 7.53a60.20 ± 14.82a36.20 ± 8.37a36.65 ± 9.37a3.75 ± 3.40a4.05 ± 3.57a
2nd course5.55 ± 5.05abc50.65 ± 10.86ab32.43 ± 6.94ab32.08 ± 6.95ab1.75 ± 2.31ab2.23 ± 2.90ab
Group 240Before23.45 ± 8.2575.38 ± 21.0243.45 ± 13.9343.10 ± 12.867.25 ± 7.066.68 ± 4.74
1st course15.58 ± 9.15a59.40 ± 18.02a38.13 ± 10.54a37.35 ± 10.03a4.03 ± 3.28a3.28 ± 3.03a
2nd course10.45 ± 6.61ab47.90 ± 10.49ab32.53 ± 7.26ab32.25 ± 7.14ab1.98 ± 2.38ab1.93 ± 2.14ab
Group 340Before21.50 ± 8.8278.53 ± 24.2246.80 ± 13.5346.15 ± 12.749.05 ± 6.547.53 ± 5.37
1st course13.03 ± 8.23a58.28 ± 13.39a38.40 ± 10.41a37.95 ± 8.65a4.60 ± 2.77a3.98 ± 2.30a
2nd course5.65 ± 4.00abc48.83 ± 9.38ab32.50 ± 7.95ab33.70 ± 7.00ab2.10 ± 1.95ab2.20 ± 1.60ab
Group 440Before23.65 ± 7.6276.88 ± 19.9046.00 ± 12.5944.38 ± 12.027.50 ± 7.666.63 ± 4.78
1st course13.95 ± 7.69a60.00 ± 16.09a38.15 ± 9.76a37.23 ± 10.50a4.10 ± 4.89a3.68 ± 2.67a
2nd course8.38 ± 6.17ab48.48 ± 13.87ab32.38 ± 9.15ab33.45 ± 8.73ab1.90 ± 3.04ab2.20 ± 2.39ab
Table 3 Comparisons of the degrees of improvement in symptoms and relevant scales for patients in each group at different stages of treatment
Frequency
P value
ScalenConeThree treatments/wkSix treatments/wkConeFrequencyConefrequency
Birmingham40142.24 ± 36.1235.20 ± 23.840.6430.8450.254
40230.30 ± 77.9540.25 ± 29.15
IBS-QOL40117.40 ± 19.0420.25 ± 14.370.2550.8470.348
40222.63 ± 15.6720.76 ± 13.83
SDS40117.99 ± 17.0210.49 ± 9.660.7340.1330.140
1st course40215.13 ± 19.3215.06 ± 15.81
SAS40113.72 ± 13.5311.96 ± 9.970.2790.5350.849
40215.65 ± 13.5014.72 ± 16.67
HAMD40127.69 ± 48.6139.54 ± 32.690.3470.0710.987
40233.78 ± 40.4445.84 ± 42.93
HAMA40112.04 ± 65.3646.90 ± 28.610.4580.0110.028
40233.62 ± 44.6536.19 ± 37.95
Birmingham40173.74 ± 19.4356.19 ± 21.620.3930.0020.078
40270.46 ± 27.2465.56 ± 20.91
IBS-QOL40129.98 ± 16.5934.26 ± 13.630.2470.2080.562
40234.02 ± 15.2935.60 ± 12.88
SDS40126.12 ± 16.1521.65 ± 14.350.1490.3730.373
2nd course40227.51 ± 17.5227.51 ± 15.12
SAS40123.68 ± 12.8322.54 ± 12.140.8710.6040.996
40224.02 ± 15.7722.90 ± 13.81
HAMD40163.06 ± 36.7468.88 ± 32.050.1390.1820.845
40269.63 ± 30.3577.45 ± 29.05
HAMA40149.62 ± 46.4462.61 ± 38.660.5020.2380.450
40259.19 ± 49.2962.04 ± 32.62
Table 4 Correlation analysis of the degrees of improvements in relevant scales and the degrees of symptom improvement
GroupnDegrees of symptom improvement(Birmingham)Degrees of improvements inrelevant scalesrP value
Aconite cake-separated moxibustion groups16066.49 ± 23.25IBS-QOL33.46 ± 14.680.0800.317
SDS25.70 ± 15.870.1650.037
SAS23.28 ± 13.590.1610.042
HAMD69.75 ± 32.280.0880.276
HAMA58.36 ± 42.190.3310.077