Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2014; 20(31): 10758-10768
Published online Aug 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10758
Published online Aug 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10758
Table 1 Main studies investigating Kras mutation assay on specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the differential diagnosis between pancreatic carcinoma and pseudo-tumorous chronic pancreatitis
| Ref. | Patient | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Overall accuracy (%) |
| PC/CP | Cytopathology alone/Kras + cytoP | Cytopathology alone/Kras + cytoP | Cytopathology alone/Kras + cytoP | |
| Tada et al[31] | 28/8 | 62/81 | 100/100 | 71/85 |
| Pellisé et al[35] | 33/24 | 97/97 | 100/100 | 84/98 |
| Takahashi et al[34] | 62/15 | 84/94 | 100/100 | CytoP alone: 58 |
| Maluf-Filho et al[33] | 57/11 | 82/90 | 97/47 | 59/89 |
| Bournet et al[28] | 129/27 | 83/88 | 100/100 | 72/90 |
| Reicher et al[30]1 | 34/16 | 88 | 94 | 90 |
| Ogura et al[29] | 307/47 | 87/93 | 100/100 | 89/94 |
| Ginestà et al[32] | 43/18 | 76/86 | 100/100 | 82/90 |
| Bournet et al[39]2 | 104/72 | 71/90 | 100/99 | 84/94 |
Table 2 Main studies with expression of miRNA in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration specimens
| Ref. | miRNA | FNA | Possible clinical implication |
| Torrisani et al[58] | Let-7a | X ↓ | Diagnosis |
| Hanoun et al[22] | miR-148b | X ↓ | Diagnosis |
| Szafranska et al[24] | |||
| Szafranska et al[24] | miR-196a | X ↑ | Diagnosis |
| Szafranska-Schwarzbach et al[66] | |||
| Szafranska et al[24] | miR-217 | X ↓ | Diagnosis |
| Szafranska-Schwarzbach et al[66] | |||
| Du Rieu et al[55] | miR-21 | X ↑ | Diagnosis, prognosis, response to treatment |
| Bloomston et al[63] | |||
| Preis et al[67] | miR-10b | X ↑ | Prognosis, response to treatment |
Table 3 Main studies investigated expression of Mucin and molecular markers for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration materials
| Molecular markers | Methods for analysis | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | Ref. |
| MUC1+/MUC2-/MUC5AC+ | IHC | 70 | 100 | 75 | 70 |
| CytoP + MUC5AC | IHC | 90 | 93 | 91 | 71 |
| CytoP + MUC1 | 85 | 100 | 89 | ||
| MSLN, UPAR | qRT-PCR | 100 | 94 | - | 77 |
| S100P | IHC | 90 | 90 | 87 | 78 |
| MSLN | 62 | 74 | 66 | ||
| S100P + KRT7 | qRT-PCR | 80 | 77 | - | 23 |
| cytoP alone | qRT-PCR | 68/88 | 100/90 | 75/89 | 73 |
| cytoP alone/cytoP + S100A6 |
- Citation: Bournet B, Gayral M, Torrisani J, Selves J, Cordelier P, Buscail L. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(31): 10758-10768
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i31/10758.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10758
