Topic Highlight
Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2014; 20(28): 9270-9280
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9270
Table 1 Seroprevalence of antibodies against hepatitis C virus in community-based studies
Study site Study period Study population Population size % with HCV antibody % with positive HCV RNA among anti-HCV seropositives America United States[7 ] 1988-1994 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, subjects aged ≥ 6 yr 21241 1.8 73.9 Puerto Rico[15 ] 2001-2002 Individuals aged 21-64 yr residing in the municipality of San Juan 964 6.3 Not done Europe Greece[11 ] 1997-1998 Individuals over 15 yr in south western Greece 1500 0.5 Not done Norway[9 ] 2000-2001 A subset of Oslo Health Study, subjects older than 30 yr 11456 0.7 79.5 France[10 ] 1994 Individuals aged 20-59 undergoing routine medical checkup in social security medical centers 6283 1.2 81.0 Spain[16 ] 1997-1998 Random sample of all ages in northern Spain 1170 1.6 63.0 Italy[12 ] 1996 Individuals of all ages which representative to southern Italy 1352 12.6 84.7 Asia India[8 ] 1999 Individuals of all ages living in rural area and engaged in agriculture-related occupations 2973 0.9 80.8 China[18 ] 1992 Individuals aged 1-59 yr in 30 provinces 68000 3.2 Not done Taiwan[17 ] 1991-1992 Males aged 30-65 yr participated a cancer screening project 11904 4.9 Not done Japan[14 ] 1984-1995 Residents aged 20-89 yr in southern Miyazaki Prefecture 973 23 Not done Africa Egypt[13 ] 1997 Adults and children aged older than 10 yr residing in Nile Delta 3999 24.3 Non done
Table 2 Follow-up studies to evaluate liver-related morbidities and mortality associated with hepatitis C virus infection
Ref. Study population Mean follow-up (yr) Identification of infection Liver-related disease Mortality Comments LC HCC All-cause Liver-related Tong et al [42 ], 1995United States 213 patients 3.9 Patients recalled the time of transfusion 51.1% 5.3% 15.3% 14.5% Most participants had symptoms Patients from tertiary care center with a history of transfusion Recall bias Seeff et al [38 ], 2001United States 222 patients 25 Time of transfusion 67.1% 4.1% 70% were males Wiese et al [44 ], 2005Germany 683 CHC women 25 Vaccinated in 1978-1979 1.3% 0.1% Relatively young and healthy CHC defined as HCV RNA (+) Kenny-Walsh[37 ], 1999Ireland 376 CHC women 17 Vaccinated in 1977-1978 2% Relatively young and healthy CHC defined as HCV RNA (+) Thomas et al [41 ], 2000United States 1667 drug abusers 8.8 First injection use ESLD incidence:3101 1/3 with HIV (+) Recall bias Tanaka et al [40 ], 2004Japan 1927 blood donors 8.3 Unknown 3341 Participants from Osaka Red Cross Blood Center relatively healthy Suruki et al [39 ], 2006Japan 667 CHC adults 7.9 Unknown 9831 Community-based CHC defined by at least 1 HCV RNA/core antigen result 70% participants of age older than 60 yr Serial tests for serum ALT Uto et al [43 ], 2009Japan 1125 adults 8.2 Unknown 25001 Community-based Tested for HCV RNA/core antigen
Table 3 Serum levels of hepatitis C virus RNA and liver-related diseases
Ref. Study population Study design Serum RNA measurements Findings Comments Naito et al [50 ] 22 HCV carriers with detectable RNA and persistently normal serum ALT levels in Japan Cross-sectional Competitive RT-PCR Serum viral load were correlated with HAI score (r = 0.68, P < 0.01) Limited number of study participants Temporality No control for confounders De Moliner et al [45 ] 96 patients without antiviral treatments in Italy Cross-sectional First-generation bDNA assay (QuantiplexTM HCV RNA 1.0) Serum viral load was not correlated with liver histological diagnosis (r = 0.58) Temporality No control for confounders Fanning et al [47 ] 77 women infected HCV genotype 1b through vaccination in Ireland Cross-sectional RT-PCR Serum viral load was weakly (r = 0.26, P < 0.05) correlated with HAI score Temporality Not correlated with the degree of fibrosis (r = 0.22, P > 0.05) Homogeneous participants with defined source of infection and the same duration of infection Lagging et al [48 ] 98 patients without antiviral treatments in Sweden Cross-sectional RT-PCR with Cobas Amplicor HCV monitor test Serum viral load was not associated with the degree of inflammation or fibrosis Temporality Hisada et al [51 ] 385 drug users with detectable HCV RNA in United States Case-cohort Third-generation of bDNA assay (QuantiplexTM HCV RNA 3.0) Elevated serum levels of HCV RNA increased the risk of ESLD death (relative hazard = 2.3 per log10 IU/mL, 95%CI: 1.5-5.9) Coinfected with HIV or HTLV-II Large population with eight yr of follow-up
Table 4 Hepatitis C virus genotypes and liver-related diseases
Ref. Study population Study design HCV genotypes determination Findings Comments Martinot-Peignoux et al [53 ] 1872 HCV infected patients from 14 tertiary referral centers in France Cross-sectional Reverse hybridization with line probe assay (LiPA) LC in genotype 1b and 4 (13% and 13%) were found more frequently than in genotype 1a, 2, or 3 (8%, 9%, and 7%), P = 0.03 Clinical patients temporality Only proportions provided, not control for other confounders Silini et al [57 ] 162 LC and 162 HCC cases in Italy Case-control Polymerase chain reaction Genotype 1b vs others: OR = 1.7 (1.1-2.9) Clinical patients Temporality Matched with age, gender, child’s class Kobayashi et al [56 ] 140 untreated CHC patients in Japan Retrospective follow-up Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Deterioration of the stage of liver histology:Genotype 1, 63%Genotype 2, 39%P < 0.05 Clinical patients Only proportions calculated and time not taken into analytical consideration Fattovich et al [55 ] 292 biopsy-proven LC patients form 7 referral centers in Europe Prospective follow-up Nested polymerase chain reaction HCC risk Clinical patients and more than 1/2 were treated with interferon Genotype 1b vs others HR = 1.0 (0.5-2.3) Bruno et al [54 ] 163 liver cirrhosis patients in Italy Prospective follow-up INNO-LiPA HCV II (Bayer Corp., Tarrytown, NY) HCC risk Interferon treated patients Genotype 1b vs 2a/c Incidence of HCC calculated HR = 3.0 (1.4-6.5)